Literature DB >> 30291333

Genome-wide association study identifies an acute myeloid leukemia susceptibility locus near BICRA.

Christopher J Walker1, Christopher C Oakes1, Luke K Genutis1, Brian Giacopelli1, Sandya Liyanarachchi1, Deedra Nicolet1,2, Ann-Kathrin Eisfeld1, Markus Scholz3,4, Pamela Brock1, Jessica Kohlschmidt1,2, Krzysztof Mrózek1, Marius Bill1, Andrew J Carroll5, Jonathan E Kolitz6, Bayard L Powell7, Eunice S Wang8, Dietger W Niederwieser9, Richard M Stone10, John C Byrd1, Sebastian Schwind9, Albert de la Chapelle1, Clara D Bloomfield11.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30291333      PMCID: PMC6405293          DOI: 10.1038/s41375-018-0281-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


× No keyword cloud information.
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common form of acute leukemia in adults, but hereditary predisposition to AML has been insufficiently studied. Previous investigations of AML heritability have focused on families with a clear clustering of AML, and have identified highly penetrant germline mutations that segregate with disease[1-2]. The importance of these findings has been highlighted by the addition of “myeloid neoplasm with germline predisposition” to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms, and the recommendation for “germline testing for predisposing variants in appropriate cases of AML” in the 2017 European LeukemiaNet guidelines. However, these AML risk variants are exceedingly rare in the general population, and in some cases have only been observed in the families in which they were first discovered. The role of more common polymorphisms in AML susceptibility is not clear. Despite evidence for an elevated risk of AML in first-degree relatives of AML patients[3,4], low-penetrance common predisposition to AML remains understudied. Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) for AML risk variants have been limited to studies with small sample sizes (fewer than 200 cases), or investigations testing only small numbers of candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)[5,6]. In contrast, large-scale GWASs have identified risk alleles associated with other leukemias and uncovered numerous associations between SNPs and various benign hematologic traits[7-9]. We therefore conducted a GWAS for AML risk using three separate patient cohorts comprising 1533 adults of European ancestry with de novo AML compared to 3969 controls. The discovery phase of the GWAS was performed using two independent American case-control sets. After filtering samples for quality control and ancestry, 1183 AML cases and 2369 controls of European ancestry (USA1: 894 cases, 1714 controls; USA2: 289 cases, 655 controls) were tested for 16,058,266 autosomal variants. Standard quality control measurements showed there was no systematic bias in the association testing, as evidenced by a genomic inflation factor λ<1 and a quantile-quantile plot in which the observed P-values only deviated from the expected P-values at the tail end (Supplementary Figure S1). The association test results from the combined USA1 and USA2 sample sets meta-analysis showed five independent loci with 11 polymorphisms that were suggestively associated with AML (P<10−6) (Supplementary Table S2). We validated the SNPs with the lowest P-values using an independent set of German AML cases and controls by MassARRAY multiplexed genotyping. We validated SNPs from 19q13, 19p13 and 13q22 since these three loci contained SNPs with the lowest overall P-values and also contained two or more SNPs with P<10-6. Six SNPs were genotyped in 350 German AML patient samples and compared with 1600 previously genotyped population-matched controls from the German LIFE-Adult study[10]. For the 19q13 locus rs75797233 was genotyped, for the 13q22 locus four SNPs were genotyped (rs6562807, rs139878336, rs2039647, and rs4356363), and for the 19p13 locus rs57706619 was genotyped because primers could not be designed for genotyping rs11670628 and rs2240811, and the genotype of rs57706619 is concordant with the genotypes of rs11670628 and rs2240811 in 99% of genomes from the study population. The 19p13 SNP rs57706619 and the 19q13 SNP rs75797233 showed support for association with AML (P<0.05) when tested individually in the German sample set (Supplementary Table S3). We performed a fixed-effects meta-analysis to combine the German sample set with the two American sample sets and calculate overall P-values for rs57706619, rs75797233 and the 13q22 SNP rs2039647 (Table 1). The combined meta-analysis P-value for rs75797233 was 4.15×10−8 (odds ratio=2.28), which meets the commonly accepted threshold of P<5×10−8 to be considered significant in a GWAS, making this the first reported SNP associated with AML risk in a GWAS. Figure 1a shows overall P-values from all tested polymorphisms in the genome.
Table 1.

Association test results combining USA1, USA2 and German sample sets, for the most significant SNPs associated with AML on 19q13, 19p13 and 13q22

SNP (cytoband)
Study population (cases / controls)Nearest genePosition[a]RAOARAFcaseRAFconOR (95% CI)P-value[b]
rs75797233 (19q13)BICRA19:48099347TA
combined analysis(I2=0)0.0310.0182.28 (1.70–3.06)4.15×10−8
USA1 (832/1653)0.0250.0132.28 (1.54–3.36)3.78×10−5
USA2 (277/611)0.0400.0202.58 (1.40–4.74)0.0039
Germany (346/1565)0.0360.0231.97 (1.01–3.83)0.046
rs57706619 (19p13)B3GNT319:17915881TC
combined analysis (I2=0.70)0.420.351.31 (1.18–1.45)2.47×10−7
USA1 (718/1394)0.400.361.21 (1.07–1.37)0.003
USA2 (270/615)0.450.351.51 (1.24–1.87)5.26×10−5
Germany (336/991)0.430.351.44 (1.02–1.70)0.038
rs2039647 (13q22)KLF1213:74763378GA
combined analysis (I2=0)0.250.211.34 (1.21–1.51)2.08×10−7
USA1 (882/1714)0.260.211.41 (1.23–1.62)9.92×10−7
USA2 (279/615)0.240.201.23 (0.98–1.65)0.077
Germany (350/1600)0.240.221.18 (0.90–1.56)0.23

Abbreviations: SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; RA, risk allele; OA, other allele; RAFcase, risk allele frequency in the cases; RAFcon, risk allele frequency in the controls; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; T, thymine; A, adenine; C, cytosine; G, guanine; I2, heterogeneity statistic representing the fraction of variability due to heterogeneity between study groups.

Position is given according to GRCh37 human genome build.

Association testing between variants and disease was performed using logistic regression assuming an additive genetic model. Combined analyses were performed using fixed-effects.

Figure 1.

Genome-wide association test from combined analysis of USA1, USA2 and German sample sets reveals the rs75797233 polymorphism near BICRA is associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) risk. a Manhattan plot shows -log10 P-values (Y-axis) for all analyzed polymorphisms in the genome. The threshold for significance in a genome-wide association study (5×10−8) is represented by the red dotted line. b Regional association and linkage disequilibrium plot of the AML risk locus at 19q13. Top, significance of association with AML (-log10 P-values) for all tested polymorphisms is shown on the Y-axis, and the threshold for genome-wide significance (5×10−8) is represented by the red dotted line. Polymorphisms are colored according to their linkage disequilibrium (R2) with rs75797233 (colored in green). The unbroken blue line behind the circles representing the polymorphisms is the recombination rate. The arrows under gene names show direction of transcription. Bottom, linkage disequilibrium plot shows the pairwise linkage disequilibrium between all polymorphisms in the region. The red triangles indicate the locations of polymorphisms that are likely to be co-inherited. Linkage disequilibrium is plotted according to 1000 Genomes European population (November 2014 release), and genome is plotted according to human genome build GRCh37. c Blood expression levels of BICRA stratified by rs75797233 genotype (AA is homozygous for the non-risk allele and AT is heterozygous). d Layered plot for monomethylation of histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4me1) shows a peak encompassing rs75797233, which implies an open chromatin state. e Transcription factor chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) for GATA2 shows a clear peak that encompasses rs75797233, which indicates GATA2 binds to this region. f Position weight matrix shows that the location of rs75797233 (indicated by the red boxes) is within a consensus GATA2 binding motif. The height of different letters at the same position is proportional to their importance for transcription factor binding in the motif.

To better characterize the rs75797233 AML risk SNP we examined its genomic context. rs75797233 is located 13kb 5′ of BRD4 Interacting Chromatin Remodeling Complex Associated Protein (BICRA also called GLTSCR1) in a 9kb haplotype block of variants often inherited together (Figure 1b). BICRA was first identified nearly two decades ago as a candidate tumor suppressor gene for glioma[11]. More recent studies have shown that BICRA directly interacts with the scaffold protein BRD4 to regulate transcriptional profiles[12], and notably, BRD4 plays a critical role in AML disease maintenance[13]. BICRA was also recently identified as a key component in a novel SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, and was shown to impact on cancer cell proliferation[14]. We first used the GTEx project database to determine if rs75797233 genotype correlates with BICRA expression. Indeed, individuals who have the rs75797233 AML risk allele (thymine, [T]) have significantly lower expression of BICRA in blood compared to individuals who are homozygous for the non-risk rs75797233 allele (adenine, [A]) (Figure 1c). We hypothesized that this correlation is because rs75797233 influences transcription factor binding in a BICRA promoter or enhancer region. We examined the ENCODE database and found that rs75797233 is marked by histone H3 lysine 4 mono-methylation (H3K4me1), indicating open chromatin and accessible DNA (Figure 1d). Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) sequencing data confirmed that the GATA2 transcription factor binds to DNA in this region (Figure 1e). Using motifbreakR we determined that the non-risk allele of rs75797233 (A) is a critical residue in a GATA2 binding site, and that GATA2 is not predicted to bind this site when the rs75797233 risk allele (T) is present (Figure 1f). To validate these data, lymphoblastoid cell lines generated from eight non-leukemic donors (four heterozygous for rs75797233 and four homozygous for the non-risk allele rs75797233 [A]) were assessed for BICRA expression using quantitative reverse transcription PCR, and assessed for GATA2 binding to rs75797233 via ChIP quantitative PCR and Sanger sequencing. Cell lines heterozygous for rs75797233 had significantly reduced BICRA expression compared to homozygous cell lines (Supplementary Figure S2a), and showed reduced binding of GATA2 to the rs75797233 locus (Supplementary Figure S2b). Preferential binding of GATA2 to the (A) allele of rs75797233 was confirmed by Sanger sequencing of amplified immunoprecipitated chromatin from heterozygous cell lines. The sequenced PCR product had a higher peak height of rs75797233 (A) compared to (T), and individually sequenced PCR amplicons from DNA topoisomeriase I (TOPO) cloning contained more (A) alleles than (T) alleles (Supplementary Figure S2c, d). Together, these data suggest that rs75797233 might associate with AML risk through mechanisms involving regulation of BICRA by GATA2. We also examined the genomic context of the suggestive association loci at 13q22 and 19p13. The suggestive association polymorphisms at 13q22 are located in a 28kb haplotype block that overlaps with the long non-coding RNA LINC00402, and is immediately 5′ of Krüppel Like Factor 12 (KLF12) (Supplementary Figure S3a). The locus at 19p13 comprises a 14kb haplotype block that includes polymorphisms both immediately 5′ and within the first intron of UDP-GlcNAc:βGal β−1,3-N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferase 3 (B3GNT3), which encodes a type II transmembrane protein involved in poly-N-acetyllactosamine synthesis (Supplementary Figure S3b). Interestingly, one of the suggestive AML risk SNPs in the 19p13 locus, rs2240811, is within a region of open chromatin marked by H3K4me1 near the transcription start site of B3GNT3 (Supplementary Figure S4a), and ENCODE ChIP sequencing data indicate that multiple transcription factors likely occupy this region (Supplementary Figure S4b). In this work we sought to expand the investigation of AML heritability to common (i.e. minor allele frequencies [MAF] > 1%) polymorphisms in the general population. We identified rs75797233 as the first common risk allele for AML, with a MAF of 1.8% in the controls and 3.1% in the cases. The overall per-allele odds ratio was >2, and notably, the individual odds ratios and MAFs were similar between the USA1, USA2 and German sample sets, indicating that the AML risk locus is not specific to a single population (Table 1). Because our study was performed using pretreatment bone marrow and blood samples from AML patients it is important to note the loci significantly or suggestively associated with AML risk are not within regions that are often somatically deleted or amplified in AML patients. Although our sample sets comprised a substantial collection of AML cases, additional association testing on more patients will be necessary to validate the significance of the 13q22 and 19p13 loci, and could also be used to explore the significance of the suggestive association loci at 1q41 and 18q22.3. The expression of BICRA is significantly lower in blood and lymphoblastoid cell lines from individuals with an rs75797233 risk allele, and the presence of the risk allele results in loss of a GATA2 binding site. However, the mechanistic link between BICRA expression and development of AML is not yet clear. BICRA is not somatically mutated in AML, and the relationship between rs75797233 and BICRA expression within the bone marrow cells that contribute to leukemic transformation needs to be assessed. Future characterization of rs75797233 and the 19q13 locus might yield novel insights into the role of BICRA in AML biology, similar to how other factors important for leukemia biology were discovered through their associations with expression quantitative trait locus SNPs[15]. In summary, our study sheds light on the role of common polymorphisms in low-penetrance heritability of AML and identifies rs75797233 as the first common low-penetrance AML risk allele.
  15 in total

1.  Familial myeloid leukemias from the Swedish Family-Cancer Database.

Authors:  Kari Hemminki; Yongwen Jiang
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.156

2.  A transcript map of the chromosome 19q-arm glioma tumor suppressor region.

Authors:  J S Smith; I Tachibana; U Pohl; H K Lee; U Thanarajasingam; B P Portier; K Ueki; S Ramaswamy; S J Billings; H W Mohrenweiser; D N Louis; R B Jenkins
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 5.736

3.  Dissection of the Major Hematopoietic Quantitative Trait Locus in Chromosome 6q23.3 Identifies miR-3662 as a Player in Hematopoiesis and Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Sophia E Maharry; Christopher J Walker; Sandya Liyanarachchi; Sujay Mehta; Mitra Patel; Maryam A Bainazar; Xiaomeng Huang; Malori A Lankenau; Kevin W Hoag; Parvathi Ranganathan; Ramiro Garzon; James S Blachly; Denis C Guttridge; Clara D Bloomfield; Albert de la Chapelle; Ann-Kathrin Eisfeld
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 39.397

4.  A genome-wide association study identifies six susceptibility loci for chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Di Bernardo; Dalemari Crowther-Swanepoel; Peter Broderick; Emily Webb; Gabrielle Sellick; Ruth Wild; Kate Sullivan; Jayaram Vijayakrishnan; Yufei Wang; Alan M Pittman; Nicola J Sunter; Andrew G Hall; Martin J S Dyer; Estella Matutes; Claire Dearden; Tryfonia Mainou-Fowler; Graham H Jackson; Geoffrey Summerfield; Robert J Harris; Andrew R Pettitt; Peter Hillmen; David J Allsup; James R Bailey; Guy Pratt; Chris Pepper; Chris Fegan; James M Allan; Daniel Catovsky; Richard S Houlston
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-08-31       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 5.  The Essential Transcriptional Function of BRD4 in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Jae-Seok Roe; Christopher R Vakoc
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2017-02-07

6.  Mutation of CEBPA in familial acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Matthew L Smith; Jamie D Cavenagh; T Andrew Lister; Jude Fitzgibbon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Genome-wide association study to identify novel loci associated with therapy-related myeloid leukemia susceptibility.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Knight; Andrew D Skol; Abhijit Shinde; Darcie Hastings; Richard A Walgren; Jin Shao; Thelma R Tennant; Mekhala Banerjee; James M Allan; Michelle M Le Beau; Richard A Larson; Timothy A Graubert; Nancy J Cox; Kenan Onel
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Glioma tumor suppressor candidate region gene 1 (GLTSCR1) and its paralog GLTSCR1-like form SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling subcomplexes.

Authors:  Aktan Alpsoy; Emily C Dykhuizen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Heritable GATA2 mutations associated with familial myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Christopher N Hahn; Chan-Eng Chong; Catherine L Carmichael; Ella J Wilkins; Peter J Brautigan; Xiao-Chun Li; Milena Babic; Ming Lin; Amandine Carmagnac; Young K Lee; Chung H Kok; Lucia Gagliardi; Kathryn L Friend; Paul G Ekert; Carolyn M Butcher; Anna L Brown; Ian D Lewis; L Bik To; Andrew E Timms; Jan Storek; Sarah Moore; Meryl Altree; Robert Escher; Peter G Bardy; Graeme K Suthers; Richard J D'Andrea; Marshall S Horwitz; Hamish S Scott
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Loci on 7p12.2, 10q21.2 and 14q11.2 are associated with risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Elli Papaemmanuil; Fay J Hosking; Jayaram Vijayakrishnan; Amy Price; Bianca Olver; Eammon Sheridan; Sally E Kinsey; Tracy Lightfoot; Eve Roman; Julie A E Irving; James M Allan; Ian P Tomlinson; Malcolm Taylor; Mel Greaves; Richard S Houlston
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-08-16       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  8 in total

1.  Gene expression signature predicts relapse in adult patients with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Christopher J Walker; Krzysztof Mrózek; Hatice Gulcin Ozer; Deedra Nicolet; Jessica Kohlschmidt; Dimitrios Papaioannou; Luke K Genutis; Marius Bill; Bayard L Powell; Geoffrey L Uy; Jonathan E Kolitz; Andrew J Carroll; Richard M Stone; Ramiro Garzon; John C Byrd; Ann-Kathrin Eisfeld; Albert de la Chapelle; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-03-09

2.  BICRA, a SWI/SNF Complex Member, Is Associated with BAF-Disorder Related Phenotypes in Humans and Model Organisms.

Authors:  Scott Barish; Tahsin Stefan Barakat; Brittany C Michel; Nazar Mashtalir; Jennifer B Phillips; Alfredo M Valencia; Berrak Ugur; Jeremy Wegner; Tiana M Scott; Brett Bostwick; David R Murdock; Hongzheng Dai; Elena Perenthaler; Anita Nikoncuk; Marjon van Slegtenhorst; Alice S Brooks; Boris Keren; Caroline Nava; Cyril Mignot; Jessica Douglas; Lance Rodan; Catherine Nowak; Sian Ellard; Karen Stals; Sally Ann Lynch; Marie Faoucher; Gaetan Lesca; Patrick Edery; Kendra L Engleman; Dihong Zhou; Isabelle Thiffault; John Herriges; Jennifer Gass; Raymond J Louie; Elliot Stolerman; Camerun Washington; Francesco Vetrini; Aiko Otsubo; Victoria M Pratt; Erin Conboy; Kayla Treat; Nora Shannon; Jose Camacho; Emma Wakeling; Bo Yuan; Chun-An Chen; Jill A Rosenfeld; Monte Westerfield; Michael Wangler; Shinya Yamamoto; Cigall Kadoch; Daryl A Scott; Hugo J Bellen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Genetic Characterization and Prognostic Relevance of Acquired Uniparental Disomies in Cytogenetically Normal Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Christopher J Walker; Jessica Kohlschmidt; Ann-Kathrin Eisfeld; Krzysztof Mrózek; Sandya Liyanarachchi; Chi Song; Deedra Nicolet; James S Blachly; Marius Bill; Dimitrios Papaioannou; Christopher C Oakes; Brian Giacopelli; Luke K Genutis; Sophia E Maharry; Shelley Orwick; Kellie J Archer; Bayard L Powell; Jonathan E Kolitz; Geoffrey L Uy; Eunice S Wang; Andrew J Carroll; Richard M Stone; John C Byrd; Albert de la Chapelle; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Spliceosomal disruption of the non-canonical BAF complex in cancer.

Authors:  Daichi Inoue; Guo-Liang Chew; Bo Liu; Brittany C Michel; Joseph Pangallo; Andrew R D'Avino; Tyler Hitchman; Khrystyna North; Stanley Chun-Wei Lee; Lillian Bitner; Ariele Block; Amanda R Moore; Akihide Yoshimi; Luisa Escobar-Hoyos; Hana Cho; Alex Penson; Sydney X Lu; Justin Taylor; Yu Chen; Cigall Kadoch; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Robert K Bradley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 69.504

5.  Genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Wei-Yu Lin; Sarah E Fordham; Eric Hungate; Nicola J Sunter; Claire Elstob; Yaobo Xu; Catherine Park; Anne Quante; Konstantin Strauch; Christian Gieger; Andrew Skol; Thahira Rahman; Lara Sucheston-Campbell; Junke Wang; Theresa Hahn; Alyssa I Clay-Gilmour; Gail L Jones; Helen J Marr; Graham H Jackson; Tobias Menne; Mathew Collin; Adam Ivey; Robert K Hills; Alan K Burnett; Nigel H Russell; Jude Fitzgibbon; Richard A Larson; Michelle M Le Beau; Wendy Stock; Olaf Heidenreich; Abrar Alharbi; David J Allsup; Richard S Houlston; Jean Norden; Anne M Dickinson; Elisabeth Douglas; Clare Lendrem; Ann K Daly; Louise Palm; Kim Piechocki; Sally Jeffries; Martin Bornhäuser; Christoph Röllig; Heidi Altmann; Leo Ruhnke; Desiree Kunadt; Lisa Wagenführ; Heather J Cordell; Rebecca Darlay; Mette K Andersen; Maria C Fontana; Giovanni Martinelli; Giovanni Marconi; Miguel A Sanz; José Cervera; Inés Gómez-Seguí; Thomas Cluzeau; Chimène Moreilhon; Sophie Raynaud; Heinz Sill; Maria Teresa Voso; Francesco Lo-Coco; Hervé Dombret; Meyling Cheok; Claude Preudhomme; Rosemary E Gale; David Linch; Julia Gaal-Wesinger; Andras Masszi; Daniel Nowak; Wolf-Karsten Hofmann; Amanda Gilkes; Kimmo Porkka; Jelena D Milosevic Feenstra; Robert Kralovics; David Grimwade; Manja Meggendorfer; Torsten Haferlach; Szilvia Krizsán; Csaba Bödör; Friedrich Stölzel; Kenan Onel; James M Allan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Genome-Wide Association Analyses Identify Variants in IRF4 Associated With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome Susceptibility.

Authors:  Junke Wang; Alyssa I Clay-Gilmour; Ezgi Karaesmen; Abbas Rizvi; Qianqian Zhu; Li Yan; Leah Preus; Song Liu; Yiwen Wang; Elizabeth Griffiths; Daniel O Stram; Loreall Pooler; Xin Sheng; Christopher Haiman; David Van Den Berg; Amy Webb; Guy Brock; Stephen Spellman; Marcelo Pasquini; Philip McCarthy; James Allan; Friedrich Stölzel; Kenan Onel; Theresa Hahn; Lara E Sucheston-Campbell
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  GBAF, a small BAF sub-complex with big implications: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah M Innis; Birgit Cabot
Journal:  Epigenetics Chromatin       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 4.954

8.  Inherited myeloproliferative neoplasm risk affects haematopoietic stem cells.

Authors:  Erik L Bao; Satish K Nandakumar; Xiaotian Liao; Alexander G Bick; Juha Karjalainen; Marcin Tabaka; Olga I Gan; Aki S Havulinna; Tuomo T J Kiiskinen; Caleb A Lareau; Aitzkoa L de Lapuente Portilla; Bo Li; Connor Emdin; Veryan Codd; Christopher P Nelson; Christopher J Walker; Claire Churchhouse; Albert de la Chapelle; Daryl E Klein; Björn Nilsson; Peter W F Wilson; Kelly Cho; Saiju Pyarajan; J Michael Gaziano; Nilesh J Samani; Aviv Regev; Aarno Palotie; Benjamin M Neale; John E Dick; Pradeep Natarajan; Christopher J O'Donnell; Mark J Daly; Michael Milyavsky; Sekar Kathiresan; Vijay G Sankaran
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 69.504

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.