Literature DB >> 24395030

The price of performance: a cost and performance analysis of the implementation of cell-free fetal DNA testing for Down syndrome in Ontario, Canada.

N Okun1, M Teitelbaum, T Huang, C S Dewa, J S Hoch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the cost and performance implications of introducing cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) testing within modeled scenarios in a publicly funded Canadian provincial Down syndrome (DS) prenatal screening program.
METHOD: Two clinical algorithms were created: the first to represent the current screening program and the second to represent one that incorporates cffDNA testing. From these algorithms, eight distinct scenarios were modeled to examine: (1) the current program (no cffDNA), (2) the current program with first trimester screening (FTS) as the nuchal translucency-based primary screen (no cffDNA), (3) a program substituting current screening with primary cffDNA, (4) contingent cffDNA with current FTS performance, (5) contingent cffDNA at a fixed price to result in overall cost neutrality,(6) contingent cffDNA with an improved detection rate (DR) of FTS, (7) contingent cffDNA with higher uptake of FTS, and (8) contingent cffDNA with optimized FTS (higher uptake and improved DR).
RESULTS: This modeling study demonstrates that introducing contingent cffDNA testing improves performance by increasing the number of cases of DS detected prenatally, and reducing the number of amniocenteses performed and concomitant iatrogenic pregnancy loss of pregnancies not affected by DS. Costs are modestly increased, although the cost per case of DS detected is decreased with contingent cffDNA testing.
CONCLUSION: Contingent models of cffDNA testing can improve overall screening performance while maintaining the provision of an 11- to 13-week scan. Costs are modestly increased, but cost per prenatally detected case of DS is decreased.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24395030     DOI: 10.1002/pd.4311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  16 in total

Review 1.  Cost-effectiveness of cell-free DNA in maternal blood testing for prenatal detection of trisomy 21, 18 and 13: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lidia García-Pérez; Renata Linertová; Margarita Álvarez-de-la-Rosa; Juan Carlos Bayón; Iñaki Imaz-Iglesia; Jorge Ferrer-Rodríguez; Pedro Serrano-Aguilar
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-12-16

2.  Trends in the use of prenatal testing services for fetal aneuploidy in Ontario: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Tianhua Huang; Shelley Dougan; Mark Walker; Christine M Armour; Nan Okun
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-10-05

3.  Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Trisomies 21, 18, and 13, Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies, and Microdeletions: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19

4.  Allocating healthcare resources to genomic testing in Canada: latest evidence and current challenges.

Authors:  Deirdre Weymann; Nick Dragojlovic; Samantha Pollard; Dean A Regier
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-07-05

5.  Incorporation of dried blood alpha fetoprotein into traditional first trimester Down syndrome screening service.

Authors:  Jonathan Carmichael; David Krantz; Hsiao-Pin Liu; David Janik; Terrence Hallahan
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Introducing the non-invasive prenatal test for trisomy 21 in Belgium: a cost-consequences analysis.

Authors:  Mattias Neyt; Frank Hulstaert; Wilfried Gyselaers
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening.

Authors:  Wybo Dondorp; Guido de Wert; Yvonne Bombard; Diana W Bianchi; Carsten Bergmann; Pascal Borry; Lyn S Chitty; Florence Fellmann; Francesca Forzano; Alison Hall; Lidewij Henneman; Heidi C Howard; Anneke Lucassen; Kelly Ormond; Borut Peterlin; Dragica Radojkovic; Wolf Rogowski; Maria Soller; Aad Tibben; Lisbeth Tranebjærg; Carla G van El; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 8.  Non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal chromosome abnormalities: review of clinical and ethical issues.

Authors:  Jean Gekas; Sylvie Langlois; Vardit Ravitsky; François Audibert; David Gradus van den Berg; Hazar Haidar; François Rousseau
Journal:  Appl Clin Genet       Date:  2016-02-04

9.  An Economic Analysis of Cell-Free DNA Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in the US General Pregnancy Population.

Authors:  Peter Benn; Kirsten J Curnow; Steven Chapman; Steven N Michalopoulos; John Hornberger; Matthew Rabinowitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Uptake, outcomes, and costs of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome into NHS maternity care: prospective cohort study in eight diverse maternity units.

Authors:  Lyn S Chitty; David Wright; Melissa Hill; Talitha I Verhoef; Rebecca Daley; Celine Lewis; Sarah Mason; Fiona McKay; Lucy Jenkins; Abigail Howarth; Louise Cameron; Alec McEwan; Jane Fisher; Mark Kroese; Stephen Morris
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-07-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.