2-Azaadamantan-6-one and its Boc and ethylene ketal derivatives were synthesized from 9-oxo endo-bicyclo[3.3.1]non-6-ene-3-carboxylic acid. Similarly, the Cbz, Boc, and ethylene ketal derivatives of 2-azaadamantan-4-one were synthesized from endo-bicyclo[3.3.1]non-6-ene-3-carboxylic acid. Key steps were Curtius rearrangements to form benzyl carbamates, followed by spontaneous intramolecular attack of the carbamate nitrogen on transient bromonium ion or epoxide intermediates to effect ring closure to azaadamantane intermediates. The reaction sequence leading to 2-azaadamantan-6-one is consistent with the formation of a transient tetracyclic keto aziridine intermediate.
2-Azaadamantan-6-one and its Boc and ethylene ketal derivatives were synthesized from 9-oxo endo-bicyclo[3.3.1]non-6-ene-3-carboxylic acid. Similarly, the Cbz, Boc, and ethylene ketal derivatives of 2-azaadamantan-4-one were synthesized from endo-bicyclo[3.3.1]non-6-ene-3-carboxylic acid. Key steps were Curtius rearrangements to form benzyl carbamates, followed by spontaneous intramolecular attack of the carbamatenitrogen on transient bromonium ion or epoxide intermediates to effect ring closure to azaadamantane intermediates. The reaction sequence leading to 2-azaadamantan-6-one is consistent with the formation of a transient tetracyclic keto aziridine intermediate.
Aza and n class="Chemical">polyazaadamantanes
continue to play important roles in
organic and medicinal chemistry.[1−13] Among the most useful members of the azaadamantane family are the
azaadamantanones 1–4 (Figure ). 1-Azaadamantane-4-one (2),
the first azaadamantanone isomer to be described,[14] was synthesized from amino ketal 5 in a double
intramolecular Mannich reaction[15,16] (Scheme ) and has figured prominently in diastereofacial
selection studies.[17,18] More recently, the highly pyramidalized
reactive lactam 1-azaadamantan-2-one (1) was obtained
by the pyrolysis of N-Boc amino acid 6.[19] Compound 7, the benzamide
derivative of 2-azaadamantan-4-one (3), the third isomer
of this family, was synthesized from unsaturated bicyclic carboxylic
acid 8 in seven steps in 31% overall yield.[20] Key steps in this synthesis were a Curtius rearrangement,
leading to 9, followed by epoxidation and spontaneous
intramolecular attack of the amidenitrogen on the transient epoxide
intermediate to form the alcohol precursor of 7. As described
in a 2018 patent,[21] compound 10, the N-benzyl derivative of 2-azaadamantan-6-one
(4) and fourth isomer of this family, was synthesized
from bicyclo[3.3.1]nonane-3,7,9-trione mono ethylene ketal (11)[22] in four steps in 15% overall
yield. The key step in this synthesis was a reductive amination to
form azaadamantane 12. In this work,[21] compounds were characterized only by low-resolution mass
spectrometry data.
Figure 1
1-Azaadamantan-2-one (1), 1-azaadamantan-4-one
(2), 2-azaadamantan-4-one (3), and 2-azaadamantan-6-one
(4).
Scheme 1
Synthesis of 1, 2, the Benzamide (7) Derivative
of 3, and the N-Benzyl (10) Derivative of 4
1-Azaadamantan-2-one (1), 1-azaadamantan-4-one
(2), 2-azaadamantan-4-one (3), and 2-azaadamantan-6-one
(4).We envisioned that a similar reaction sequence to that
executed
by Staas and Spurlock[20] in the synthesis
of 7 (Scheme ) with 9-oxo endo-bicyclo[3.3.1]non-6-ene-3-carboxylic
acid (13) (vide infra) rather than 8 could
provide an avenue to obtain 4. Such an approach was recently
exemplifed by Kozawa and Endo[23] and Shibuya
et al.[24] who converted 8 to
n class="Chemical">carbamate 14(24) via a Curtius
rearrangement, followed by bromine-mediated cyclization to 15 (Scheme ). Hydrogenolysis
of 15 yielded the desired 2-azaadamantane 16. Although the presumed β-bromo azaadamantane reaction intermediate 17 was not isolated, the authors were able to characterize
its tetracyclic aziridine cyclization product 18 which
underwent hydrogenolysis to 16.[23] More directly, Shibuya et al.[24] converted 14 to 16 in one step by intramolecular hydroamination
with four equivalents of triflic acid.
Scheme 2
Synthesis of 2-Azaadamantane
(16) by Two Different Reaction
Pathways
Results and Discussion
Accordingly, we prepared starting material 13 in three
steps from bicyclo[3.3.1]nonane-2,6-dione[25] in 55% overall yield according to a modified method of Stetter and
Dorsch.[26] Conversion of 13 to n class="Chemical">carbamate 19 (83% yield) was readily achieved by
a Curtius rearrangement, followed by reaction with benzyl alcohol
using the reaction protocol described by Shibuya et al[24] (Scheme ). Several attempts using hydroamination reactions with triflic
acid[20] or other conditions[27,28] failed to effect ring closure of 19 to the desired
azaadamantane. However, exposure of 19 to either bromine
at 0 °C or N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) at room
temperature (rt) effected cyclization to bromo azaadamantane carbamate 20 in 97–99% yield. Treatment of 20 with
H2, Pd/C, and K2CO3 in MeOH (or EtOH)
effected a one-pot Cbz deprotection and debromination to afford the
desired 4, which due to its high water solubility was
converted to Boc derivative 21 in an overall yield of
77%. Deprotection of 21 with ethereal hydrogen chloride
afforded 4 as the hydrochloride salt in 94% yield (Scheme ). In addition, 23, the ethylene ketal derivative of 4, was obtained
from 21 in a two-step sequence with an overall yield
of 77%.
Scheme 3
Synthesis of 21, the Boc Derivative of 4
Scheme 4
Synthesis of 2-Azaadamantan-6-one
(4) and Its Ethylene
Ketal Derivative 23
Next, in an attempt to convert 20 to key
intermediate 21 in a one-pot reaction, we exposed 20 to H2, n class="Chemical">Pd/C, Boc2O, and Et3N in dioxane (Scheme ). Unexpectedly,
this reaction formed 24, the transcarbamylation product,
not the desired 21. Product 24 was also
formed when using tetrahydrofuran (THF) as the solvent or K2CO3 as the base. As we had not observed 26 in the conversion of 20 to 4 via 21, we recognized that 24 afforded another opportunity
to synthesize 26. Thus, deprotection of 24 with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) afforded 25 as the
trifluoroacetate salt in 92% yield. Treatment of 25 with
K2CO3 in MeOH effected cyclization to 26. Hydrogenation of the crude reaction product afforded 4. However, the instability of 26 precluded its
isolation, and we could only characterize it by extraction with CDCl3, followed by NMR and high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS)
analysis.
Scheme 5
Synthesis of Tetracyclic Keto Aziridine 26
The structure of 26 was strongly suggested by 10 signals
in the 13C{n class="Chemical">1H} NMR spectrum including a downfield
signal at 212.8 ppm, three methylenecarbons in the APT spectrum,
and a molecular formula of C9H11NO determined
by HRMS. This structural assignment was consistent with key COSY correlations,
which identified H-9 as the only methine hydrogen with vicinal coupling
to its hydrogen partners on the adjacent methine carbons C-3 and C-7.
Further, a 15N–1H heteronuclear multiple bond correlation experiment
showed that 2-N is a tertiary amine by the chemical shift and absence
of a directly bonded hydrogen; these data also revealed two-bond correlations
between 2-N and the hydrogen atoms on methine carbons C-1 and C-9
and three-bond correlations between 2-N and the hydrogen atoms on
methylenecarbons C-4, C-8, and C-10.
The debromination of both 16 and 20 in
MeOH and n class="Chemical">EtOH solvents during hydrogenolysis presumably occurs via
SN2 cyclization to form an aziridinium bromide intermediate,
which after formation of the free base undergoes further hydrogenolysis
opening the aziridine ring. Because loss of bromide was not observed
in aprotic dioxane and THF solvents, we modeled the intramolecular
SN2 reaction to better understand the effects of solvent
and the carbonyl substituent. Figure shows the potential energy diagram for the intramolecular
conversion of 17 and 25 to their respective
aziridinium salts 18H+ and 26H+. Using the M06-2x functional of Zhao and Truhlar,[29] transition-state structures were located and
used as inputs for intrinsic reaction coordinate calculations. The
following results are of interest: (1) both the free energy of activation
and the free energy of the reaction are lower for 17 versus 25; (2) the less than ideal angle of SN2 attack
of 152.8° is the same for both nonketone and ketoneazaadamantane
transition states; (3) base neutralization of 26H+ is more exergonic compared to that of 18H+ (modeled with sodium carbonate base); and (4) changing to
a less polar THF solvent increases both the free energy of activation
and endergonic value of the reaction.
Figure 2
Potential energy diagram for the intramolecular
conversion of 17 and 25 to their respective
aziridinium salts 18H+ and 26H+.
Potential energy diagram for the intramolecular
conversion of 17 and 25 to their respective
aziridinium salts 18H+ and 26H+.From these data, we surmise
that decrease in stability of the aziridinium
product by the presence of an electron-withdrawing n class="Chemical">ketone or a decrease
in solvent polarity makes aziridinium ion formation less favorable.
These results also imply that the initial basicity of the azaadamantane
is the key factor in the formation of the aziridine intermediate;
the more basic the azadamantane, the more favorable the SN2 cyclization. Isodesmic modeling of proton affinity differences
between 17 and 25 indicates that 17 is approximately four pKa units more
basic than 25 (Supporting Information). The substantial decrease in basicity afforded by a carbonyl group
three bonds from the aza group is consistent with the withdrawal of
electron density by both inductive and field effects.[30]
Encouraged by the successful conversion of 13 to 4, we then sought to use a similar approach
to convert 8 to 3 (Scheme ). The starting material bicyclic carbamate 14 was obtained from 8 according to the method
of Shibuya
et al.[24] Treatment of 14 with n class="Chemical">meta-chloroperoxybenzoic acid (m-CPBA)
effected cyclization to hydroxy azaadamantane carbamate 27 in 81% yield; 27 was presumably formed as the anti
epimer[20] assuming back-side attack of the
epoxide by the carbamate. Oxidation of 27 furnished 28, the Cbz derivative of 3 in 93% yield. Transcarbamylation
of 28 afforded the corresponding Boc derivative 29 in 98% yield. However, all attempts to synthesize 3 by hydrogenolysis of 28 or acid-promoted deprotection
of 29 failed. Nevertheless, we were able to convert 28 to 31, the ethylene ketal derivative of 3, in a three-step two-pot sequence with an overall yield
of 96%. Thus, 3, unlike 4, is stable only
when one of its two functional groups is in a protected form.
Scheme 6
Synthesis of the Cbz (28), Boc (29), and
Ethylene Ketal (31) Derivatives of 2-Azaadamantan-4-one
(3)
In summary, we synthesized 2-azaadamantan-6-one (4) and its Boc (21) and ethylene ketal (26) derivatives. We also describe syntheses of the Cbz (28), Boc (29), and ethylene ketal (31) derivatives
of 2-azaadamantan-4-one (3). We anticipate that these
azaadamantanes will be useful starting points for further exploration
because of the rich chemistry available for their ketone and secondary
aliphatic amine functional groups.
Experimental Section
General
Melting points are uncorrected. 1D 1H and n class="Chemical">13C NMR spectra were generated with a 500 MHz spectrometer
using CDCl3 and DMSO-d6 as
solvents. Chemical shifts are reported in parts per million (ppm)
and are relative to internal (CH3)4Si (0 ppm)
for 1H and CDCl3 (77.0 ppm) or DMSO-d6 (39.7 ppm) for 13C NMR. Electron
ionization gas chromatography–MS (EI GC–MS) data were
obtained using a quadrapole mass spectrometer with 30 m DB-5 type
columns and a He flow rate of 1 mL/min. We used a silica gel (sg)
particle size of 40–63 μm for all flash column chromatography.
Reported reaction temperatures are those of the oil bath.
2-Azaadamantan-6-one
Hydrochloride (4)
A mixture of 21 (200 mg, 0.80 mmol) and a 1 M HCl solution
indiethyl ether (5 mL) was stirred at rt for 12 h. The resulting
solid was filtered and washed with diethyl ether to afford 4 (141 mg, 94%) as a white solid. mp > 350 °C (dec.). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 2.03–2.14
(m, 4H), 2.38–2.47 (m, 4H), 2.55 (d, J = 3.9
Hz, 2H), 3.69 (s, 2H), 9.69 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 34.3, 43.2, 46.0, 212.6. Anal. Calcd
for C9H13NO·HCl: C, 57.60; H, 7.52; N,
7.46. Found: C, 58.00; H, 7.50; N, 7.46.
To a mixture of 9-oxobicyclo[3.3.1]non-6-ene-3-carboxylic
acid (13)[26] (8.00 g, 44.4
mmol), n class="Chemical">toluene (75 mL), and THF (15 mL), Et3N (11.23 g,
111.0 mmol) and diphenylphosphoryl azide (12.83 g, 46.6 mmol) were
added at rt. The resulting mixture was stirred at rt for 3 h before
addition of BnOH (19.20 g, 173.2 mmol); stirring continued under reflux
for another 2 h. The solvents were removed in vacuo to give a colorless
oil which was partitioned between EtOAc (200 mL) and H2O (100 mL). The organic layer was separated and washed with brine
(100 mL), dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated.
The crude was purified by column chromatography (sg, hexanes/EtOAc,
5:1–2:1) to give 19 (10.47 g, 83%) as a colorless
oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 2.13–2.43
(m, 4H), 2.60–2.75 (m, 2H), 2.76–2.91 (m, 2H), 4.04–4.11
(m, 1H), 5.02–5.10 (m, 2H), 5.81–6.03 (m, 3H), 7.29–7.44
(m, 5H); 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 37.1, 38.5,
40.9, 43.7, 43.8, 45.6, 66.7, 128.2, 128.6, 128.9, 131.2, 136.5, 155.4,
215.0. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M]+ calcd for C17H19NO3, 285.1365;
found, 285.1354.
To a mixture of 19 (5.71 g, 20.0
mmol) and K2CO3 (5.53 g, 40.0 mmol) inn class="Chemical">CH3CN (20 mL) at 0 °C was added dropwise a solution of bromine
(4.79 g, 30.0 mmol) in CH3CN (6 mL). The resulting mixture
was stirred for 30 min at 0 °C and then partitioned between EtOAc
(100 mL) and H2O (50 mL). The organic layer was separated
and washed with 1 N NaOH (30 mL) and brine (30 mL), dried over anhydrous
MgSO4, and concentrated to afford 20 (7.21
g, 99%) as a white solid. mp 96–97 °C. 1H NMR
(CDCl3): δ 2.03 (t, J = 15.0 Hz,
1H), 2.07–2.17 (m, 2H), 2.22 (t, J = 12.9
Hz, 1H), 2.35 (dd, J = 25.9, 13.4 Hz, 1H), 2.72 (d, J = 3.3 Hz, 1H), 2.80 (t, J = 15.4 Hz,
1H), 2.99 (s, 1H), 4.48 (s, 0.5H), 4.55 (s, 1H), 4.57 (s, 0.5H), 4.60
(s, 0.5H), 4.65 (s, 0.5H), 5.14–5.26 (m, 2H), 7.27–7.41
(m, 5H); 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 31.7, 31.9,
37.5, 37.7, 39.8, 40.2, 44.1, 44.8, 45.5, 50.5, 51.2, 53.2, 53.7,
54.1, 67.7, 128.1, 128.4, 128.7, 136.2, 154.2, 154.3, 210.8. HRMS
(ESI-TOF) m/z: [M]+ calcd
for C17H1879BrNO3, 363.0470;
found, 363.0483.
Method 2
To a solution of 19 (285 mg,
1.0 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was added n class="Chemical">NBS (214
mg, 1.2 mmol) in one portion at rt. The resulting mixture was stirred
at rt for 12 h and then quenched with H2O (5 mL). The organic
layer was separated and washed with 1 N NaOH (5 mL) and brine (5 mL),
dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated to afford 20 (353 mg, 97%) as a white solid.
A mixture of 20 (1.21 g, 3.32 mmol),
K2CO3 (2.29 g, 16.6 mmol), and Pd–C (10
wt %) (0.12 g) in MeOH (50 mL) was stirred under H2 at
rt. The reaction was traced by GC and NMR until peaks for 20, and the intermediate keto aziridine 24 disappeared.
After 16 h, the reaction mixture was filtered through Celite and washed
with MeOH (20 mL). The filtrate was concentrated to afford an off-white
residue composed of crude 2-azaadamantan-6-one (4) and
inorganic salts, which was used as the starting material for the next
step without further purification. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 2.05 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 4H), 2.28 (d, J = 11.3 Hz, 4H), 2.71 (s, 2H), 3.26 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 39.5, 45.9, 46.4, 217.4.
Step
2
To a mixture of the crude 4, NaHCO3 (418 mg, 4.98 mmol), n class="Chemical">dioxane (30 mL), and H2O
(10 mL) was added dropwise a solution of (Boc)2O (869 mg,
3.98 mmol) in dioxane (10 mL) at rt. The resulting mixture was stirred
at rt overnight and concentrated. The resultant residue was partitioned
between EtOAc (30 mL) and H2O (20 mL). The organic layer
was separated and washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated. The crude was purified by column chromatography
(sg, hexane/EtOAc, 5:1–2:1) to give 21 (640 mg,
77%) as a white solid. mp 126–127 °C. 1H NMR
(CDCl3): δ 1.50 (s, 9H), 2.01 (t, J = 10.1 Hz, 4H), 2.18 (t, J = 13.2 Hz, 4H), 2.69
(s, 2H), 4.34 (s, 1H), 4.47 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 28.4, 37.5, 37.8, 45.0, 46.4, 79.8, 154.1, 215.9.
HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M]+ calcd for C14H21NO3, 251.1521;
found, 251.1525. Anal. Calcd for C14H21NO3: C, 66.91; H, 8.42; N, 5.57. Found: C, 67.08; H, 8.43; N,
5.67.
A mixture of 21 (251 mg, 1 mmol),
ethylene glycol (124 mg, 2 mmol) p-n class="Chemical">toluenesulfonic
acid (20 mg), and toluene (10 mL) was heated under reflux for 12 h
in a Dean–Stark apparatus. After cooling, the reaction mixture
was washed with saturated NaHCO3 (10 mL) and brine (10
mL), dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated. The
crude product was purified by column chromatography (sg, hexane/EtOAc,
5:1) to afford tert-butyl 6-azaspiro[adamantane-2,2′-[1,3]dioxolane]-6-carboxylate
(22) (131 mg, 100%) as a white solid. mp 92–93
°C 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.45 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 9H), 1.71–1.82 (m, 4H), 1.92 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 6H), 3.96 (s, 4H), 4.10 (s, 1H), 4.23 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 28.5, 33.3, 33.6, 35.1,
44.8, 46.3, 64.41, 64.43, 79.1, 110.1, 154.3.
Step 2
A mixture of 22 (100 mg, 0.34 mmol)
and 1 M ethereal HCl (3 mL) was stirred at rt for 12 h. The resulting
solid was filtered and washed with diethyl ether to afford 23 (56 mg, 77%) as a white solid. mp 337–338 °C. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 1.92 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 6H), 2.02–2.15 (m, 4H), 3.47 (s, 2H),
3.92 (s, 4H), 9.28 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 30.8, 33.5, 45.8, 64.7, 108.4. Anal. Calcd
for C11H17NO2·HCl: C, 57.02;
H, 7.83; N, 6.04. Found: C, 57.42; H, 7.66; N, 6.04.
A mixture of 25 (50 mg, 0.15
mmol) and K2CO3 (60 mg, 0.44 mmol) inMeOH (5
mL) was stirred at rt for 2 h and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated
in vacuo at rt to remove most of the solvent. The residue was then
extracted with chloroform. The extract was concentrated in vacuo at
rt and redissolved in CDCl3. The concentration–redissolution
step was repeated three times to remove the residual MeOH. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.80 (ddt, J =
13.3, 4.3, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 2.01 (dtd, J = 13.1, 3.7,
1.5 Hz, 1H), 2.18 (dd, J = 11.3, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 2.43
(dtt, J = 4.7, 3.1, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 2.51 (dq, J = 14.7, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 2.55–2.63 (m, 2H), 2.84 (td, J = 4.6, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 2.90–3.05 (m, 2H), 3.78 (t, J = 4.6 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3):
δ 32.3, 36.0, 41.9, 42.3, 47.7, 48.5, 52.0, 54.1, 212.7. HRMS
(ESI-TOF) m/z: [M]+ calcd
for C9H11NO, 149.0841; found, 149.0841.
To a mixture of m-CPBA (2.54 g, 14.74
mmol) and CH2Cl2 (25 mL) was added dropwise
a solution of benzyl(bicyclo[3.3.1]non-6-en-3-yl)carbamate (14)[24] (2.00 g, 7.37 mmol). The
resulting mixture was stirred at rt for 12 h, washed with 1 N NaOH
(20 mL) and brine (20 mL), dried over anhydrous MgSO4,
and then concentrated. The crude product was purified by column chromatography
(sg, CH2Cl2/CH3OH, 5:1) to afford 27 (1.72 g, 81%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.50–1.74 (m, 3H), 1.82 (dt, J = 19.4, 3.3 Hz, 3H), 1.90–1.98 (m, 1H), 1.98–2.05
(m, 1H), 2.05–2.23 (m, 3H), 3.86 (dt, J =
7.4, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 4.20 (s, 0.5H), 4.25 (s, 0.5H), 4.26 (s, 0.5H),
4.32 (s, 0.5H), 5.13 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 2H), 7.27–7.43
(m, 5H); 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 25.8, 28.7,
29.0, 29.31, 29.34, 32.8, 33.1, 34.8, 35.3, 35.5, 45.8, 46.4, 51.0,
51.3, 66.9, 67.0, 70.2, 70.6, 127.7, 127.8, 127.9, 128.5, 136.9, 154.7,
154.9. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M]+ calcd for C17H21NO3, 287.1521;
found, 287.1519.
Benzyl 4-Oxo-2-azaadamantane-2-carboxylate
(28)
To a mixture of pyridinium chlorochromate
(2.51 g, 11.62 mmol)
and n class="Chemical">CH2Cl2 (20 mL) was added dropwise a solution
of 24 (1.67 g, 5.81 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (10 mL). The resulting mixture was stirred at rt for 2 h and filtered.
The filter cake was washed with CH2Cl2 (10 mL).
The combined filtrate was washed with 1 N HCl (20 mL) and brine (20
mL), dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated. The
crude product was purified by column chromatography (sg, hexane/EtOAc,
4:1) to afford 28 (1.56 g, 93%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.81–1.95 (m, 2H),
1.95–2.12 (m, 3H), 2.12–2.28 (m, 4H), 2.68 (s, 1H),
4.44 (s, 0.5H), 4.49 (s, 0.5H), 4.55 (s, 0.5H), 4.62 (s, 0.5H), 5.04–5.20
(m, 2H), 7.23–7.39 (m, 5H); 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 26.1, 34.1, 34.3, 37.4, 37.6, 38.1, 45.5, 46.0, 46.6,
60.4, 67.3, 127.8, 128.0, 128.5, 136.5, 154.3, 209.9, 210.2. HRMS
(ESI-TOF) m/z: [M]+ calcd
for C17H19NO3, 285.1365; found, 285.1360.
Authors: Etzer Darout; Ralph P Robinson; Kim F McClure; Matthew Corbett; Bryan Li; Andrei Shavnya; Melissa P Andrews; Christopher S Jones; Qifang Li; Martha L Minich; Vincent Mascitti; Cristiano R W Guimarães; Michael J Munchhof; Kevin B Bahnck; Cuiman Cai; David A Price; Spiros Liras; Paul D Bonin; Peter Cornelius; Ruduan Wang; Victoria Bagdasarian; Colleen P Sobota; Sam Hornby; Victoria M Masterson; Reena M Joseph; Amit S Kalgutkar; Yue Chen Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2012-12-31 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Marie-Céline Frantz; Erin M Skoda; Joshua R Sacher; Michael W Epperly; Julie P Goff; Joel S Greenberger; Peter Wipf Journal: Org Biomol Chem Date: 2013-07-07 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: Martin Morgenthaler; Eliane Schweizer; Anja Hoffmann-Röder; Fausta Benini; Rainer E Martin; Georg Jaeschke; Björn Wagner; Holger Fischer; Stefanie Bendels; Daniel Zimmerli; Josef Schneider; François Diederich; Manfred Kansy; Klaus Müller Journal: ChemMedChem Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Evgeniy Suslov; Vladimir V Zarubaev; Alexander V Slita; Konstantin Ponomarev; Dina Korchagina; Daniel M Ayine-Tora; Jóhannes Reynisson; Konstantin Volcho; Nariman Salakhutdinov Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Jianbo Wu; Xiaofang Wang; Francis C K Chiu; Cécile Häberli; David M Shackleford; Eileen Ryan; Sriraghavan Kamaraj; Vivek J Bulbule; Alexander I Wallick; Yuxiang Dong; Karen L White; Paul H Davis; Susan A Charman; Jennifer Keiser; Jonathan L Vennerstrom Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2020-03-19 Impact factor: 7.446