| Literature DB >> 30287900 |
Xiao-Yu Liu1, Xin Li1, Ming-Ru Bai1, Xia Chen1, Cheng-Lin Wang1, Jing Xie2, Ling Ye3.
Abstract
It is well recognized that osteocytes communicate with each other via gap junctions and that connxin43 (Cx43) shows its great potential in gap junction for the contribution enabling transmission of small molecules and operating in an autocrine/a paracrine manner. Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) play significant roles in new bone formation and adult bone remodeling, and FGF signaling is regulated by the precise spatiotemporal approaches. However, the influence of FGF7 on osteocyte cell processes is not well elucidated. In this study, we aimed to examine the impact of FGF7 on osteocyte cell processes by characterizing the expression of Cx43 and to reveal the underlying mechanism regulating this cell process. We first found that the mRNA level of FGF7 was higher relative to other FGF family members both in osteocytes cell line (MLO-Y4) and bone tissue. We then demonstrated that FGF7 could increase the expression of Cx43 in osteocytes and promote the cell processes in the form of gap junctions between osteocytes. This modulation was due to the FGF7-induced cytoplasmic accumulation and resultant nuclear translocation of β-catenin. Our results could help us to further understand the importance of FGF7 on bone cell behavior and bone physiology and even pathology.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30287900 PMCID: PMC6172271 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-33247-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Primer pairs of all FGFs in mice.
| mRNA | Primer pairs |
|---|---|
| GAPDH | Forward: AGGTTGTCTCCTGCGACTTCA |
| Reverse: CCAGGAAATGAGCTTGACAAA | |
| FGF1 (110 bp) | Forward: GCTCGCAGACACCAAATGAG |
| Reverse: GAGGCCCACAAACCAGTTCT | |
| FGF2 (162 bp) | Forward: GGCTGCTGGCTTCTAAGTGT |
| Reverse: TCTGTCCAGGTCCCGTTTTG | |
| FGF3 (169 bp) | Forward: GACGGCTGTATGCTTCGGAT |
| Reverse: CCATTCACCGACACGTACCA | |
| FGF4 (148 bp) | Forward: AAGCTCTTCGGTGTGCCTTT |
| Reverse: CTCGGTTCCCCTTCTTGGTC | |
| FGF5 (194 bp) | Forward: GCTGTGTCTCAGGGGATTGT |
| Reverse: TACCACTCTCGGCCTGTCTT | |
| FGF6 (152 bp) | Forward: ACACGAGGAGAACCCCTACA |
| Reverse: GGAACTTGCATTCGTCGTGG | |
| FGF7 (194 bp) | Forward: CGTGGCAGTTGGAATTGTGG |
| Reverse: AGGCAACGAACATTTCCCCT | |
| FGF8 (117 bp) | Forward: GTTGCACTTGCTGGTTCTCTG |
| Reverse: AAGGGTCGGTCCTCGTGT | |
| FGF9 (147 bp) | Forward: ACGGTCGGATGGGATGAAGA |
| Reverse: TGGCACAGGTTCAAGGTCAA | |
| FGF10 (169 bp) | Forward: GTGCGGAGCTACAATCACCT |
| Reverse: CGGCAACAACTCCGATTTCC | |
| FGF11 (142 bp) | Forward: CCAGCTCCTTCACCCACTTC |
| Reverse: AAGCGACACTCTGCTGTGAA | |
| FGF12 (95 bp) | Forward: CTCCCACTTCTCGCCTCTTG |
| Reverse: AGCTGGGTGAGGTCTACGAA | |
| FGF13 (108 bp) | Forward: GCTAGTCTCGCCTGCCATC |
| Reverse: CATGCCTTCTGAGCTCCTCC | |
| FGF14 (127 bp) | Forward:AGCGGCTTGATCCGTCAGAAA |
| Reverse: AGAAGATATCCACCAGGTTGCC | |
| FGF15 (132 bp) | Forward: GACTGCGAGGAGGACCAAAA |
| Reverse: CAGCCCGTATATCTTGCCGT | |
| FGF16 (166 bp) | Forward: GATCAGCATCAGGGGAGTGG |
| Reverse: CTCCGAGTCCGAGTGTTTGT | |
| FGF17 (180 bp) | Forward: CAGTAGCCCAAGAGAGCGAG |
| Reverse: TCTCGGAGCCACAGGTTTTC | |
| FGF18 (171 bp) | Forward: GGACCAGTGGGAAGCACATT |
| Reverse: CGAGCTTGCCTTTTCGGTTC | |
| FGF20 (179 bp) | Forward: GAGATGGTGCCAGGTCCAAA |
| Reverse: TCCTGAACGTCTTCTTCGGTG | |
| FGF21 (148 bp) | Forward: TCTGAACCTGACCCATCCCT |
| Reverse: GTCCCAGGGTCCCAACTCTA | |
| FGF22 (128 bp) | Forward: GAGATCCGTTCTGTCCGTGT |
| Reverse: TCCCGGAACCTACAGTCCA | |
| FGF23 (144 bp) | Forward: GCAAACGCTCGAACTCTCTC |
| Reverse: ACAATCCGAGGTCTCAAGGA |
Figure 1Differential mRNA levels of FGF family in osteocytes and bone tissues. (A) The mRNA level of FGFs in MLOY4 cell line. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis was performed on RNA extracted from MLOY4 to determine transcript copy numbers of FGFs relative to the reference gene GAPDH. The indicated values are ratios of copy numbers of each gene. Data were means of three independent experiments (n = 3); bars ± SD. (B) The mRNA level of FGFs in bone tissues. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis was performed on RNA extracted from femur and tibia of C57BL/6J mice to determine transcript copy numbers of FGFs relative to the reference gene GAPDH. The indicated values are ratios of copy numbers of each gene. The data were means of three independent experiments (n = 3); bars ± SD.
Figure 2The relative expressions of FGF family showing the mRNA changes in osteocytes in comparison to long bone tissues. (A) The comparative expressions of canonical FGFs in both osteocyte cell line and bone tissue. (B) The comparative expressions of endocrine FGFs in both osteocyte cell line and bone tissue. (C) The comparative expressions of intracellular FGFs in both osteocyte cell line and bone tissue. The results shown were performed by reversed transcript PCR and revealed by relevant regions of ethidium bromide (EB) - stained agarose gels (2%). O+ and T+ represent reverse transcribed RNA; O− and T− represent mock reversed transcribed RNA. Size (in bp) of PCR products are indicated to the right of each panel. The data indicated were means of three independent experiments (n = 3).
Figure 3FGF7 induced the morphology of the osteocytes to a more stellate shape, increased the expression of connexin43 in a concentration-dose dependent manner. (A) Cell morphologies after FGF7 induction at the concentration of 0.5, 5, 20 ng/ml for 24 h and the red arrows showed the increased osteocyte cell processes in the higher magnification of the boxed area. (B) Quantitative analysis of the number of osteocyte processes of (A) with Image-J software 6.0. Data were means of three independent experiments (n = 3); Significant difference with respect to control, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.025, ***P < 0.001. (C) Western blots showed connexin43 expressions after FGF7 induction increased in a concentration-dose (0.5, 5, 20 ng/ml) dependent manner. The cell lysates were collected at 48 h following FGF7 treatments for connexin43 and beta-actin; the images were collected from two gels with the same loading amounts. The blot gels shown are representatives of three independent experiments (n = 3). (D) Quantitative analysis of western blots of (C) with Image-J software 6.0. Data were means of three independent experiments (n = 3); Significant difference with respect to control. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.025.
Figure 4Expression of connexin43 increased after the treatment of FGF7. (A) Immunofluorescent stain showed the increased expression of connexin43 in osteocytes at 24 h after the treatment with FGF7 (20 ng/ml). The middle lane with FGF induction indicated the elongation of osteocyte cell processes and the bottom lane with FGF induction indicated the width of osteocyte cell processes. Images shown were representative of three independent experiments (n = 3). (B) Different lengths of the osteocyte cell processes in examples of the control and the treatment group. Lengths of the cell processes were analyzed using Image-J software 6.0. Data expressed were means of three different experiments (n = 3). (C) Different widths of the osteocyte cell processes in examples of the control and the treatment group. Widths of the cell processes were analyzed using Image-J software 6.0. Data expressed were means of three independent experiments (n = 3); Significant difference with respect to control. **p < 0.025; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 5The elongation of gap junction after the treatment of FGF7. (A) Immunofluorescent stain showed the elongation of gap junction between osteocytes at 24 h after the treatment with the FGF7 (20 ng/ml). Images shown were representative of three different experiments (n = 3). (B) The higher magnification of boxed area showed the elongation of gap junction, as the white arrow indicated. (C) Different lengths and widths of the gap junction per cell in examples of the control and the treatment group. The quantitative data were analyzed using Image-J software 6.0. Data expressed were means of three independent experiments (n = 3). Significant difference with respect to control. **p < 0.025; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 6The gap junction elongated through beta-catenin transduction. (A) Immunofluorescent stain showed the nuclear accumulations of beta-catenin in osteocytes at 24 h after treatment with FGF7 (20 ng/ml). The images shown are representative of three different experiments (n = 3). (B) Western blot showed beta-catenin and active beta-catenin expressions after FGF7 induction increased in a concentration-dose (0.5, 5 and 20 ng/ml) dependent manner. Cell lysates were collected at 48 h following FGF7 treatments for beta-catenin, active beta-catenin and beta-actin; the images were collected from two gels with the same loading amounts. The blot gels shown are representatives of three different experiments (n = 3). (C) Quantitative analysis of western blots of (B) with Image-J software 6.0. The data shown are representative of three independent experiments (n = 3). ***P < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. (D) Western blot showed the inhibitor of β-catenin, XAV-939, reduced the Cx43 level. In the presence of FGF7, β-catenin inhibition partially reduced the Cx43 in relative to FGF7 induction group. The blot gels shown are representatives of three different experiments (n = 3). (E) Quantitative analysis of western blots (D) with Image-J software 6.0. The data shown are representative of three independent experiments (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.025. (F) Western blot showed Lef-1 expressions after FGF7 induction increased in a concentration-dose (0.5, 5 and 20 ng/ml) dependent manner. (G) Quantitative analysis of western blots of (F) with Image-J software 6.0. The data shown are representative of three independent experiments (n = 3). ***P < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, NS, no significant difference. (H) The bioinformatics showed that Lef1 has the binding sites in the promoter of Gja1, the gene name of Cx43.