H E Kloefkorn1, B Y Jacobs2, D F Xie3, K D Allen4. 1. J Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States. Electronic address: hkloefk@emory.edu. 2. J Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States. Electronic address: bjacobs@bme.ufl.edu. 3. J Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States. Electronic address: dfx24@ufl.edu. 4. J Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States. Electronic address: kyle.allen@bme.ufl.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In osteoarthritis (OA) models, histology is commonly used to evaluate the severity of joint damage. Unfortunately, semi-quantitative histological grading systems include some level of subjectivity, and quantitative grading systems can be tedious to implement. The objective of this work is to introduce an open source, graphic user interface (GUI) for quantitative grading of knee OA. METHODS: Inspired by the 2010 OARSI histopathology recommendations for the rat, our laboratory has developed a GUI for the evaluation of knee OA, nicknamed GEKO. In this work, descriptions of the quantitative measures acquired by GEKO are presented and measured in 42 histological images from a rat knee OA model. Using these images, across-session and within-session reproducibility for individual graders is evaluated, and inter-grader reliability across different levels of OA severity is also assessed. RESULTS: GEKO allowed histological images to be quantitatively scored in less than 1 min per image. In addition, intra-class coefficients (ICCs) were largely above 0.8 for across-session reproducibility, within-session reproducibility, and inter-grader reliability. These data indicate GEKO aided in the reproducibility and repeatability of quantitative OA grading across graders and grading sessions. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate GEKO is a reliable and efficient method to calculate quantitative histological measures of knee OA in a rat model. GEKO reduced quantitative grading times relative to manual grading systems and allowed grader reproducibility and repeatability to be easily assessed within a grading session and across time. Moreover, GEKO is being provided as a free, open-source tool for the OA research community.
OBJECTIVE: In osteoarthritis (OA) models, histology is commonly used to evaluate the severity of joint damage. Unfortunately, semi-quantitative histological grading systems include some level of subjectivity, and quantitative grading systems can be tedious to implement. The objective of this work is to introduce an open source, graphic user interface (GUI) for quantitative grading of knee OA. METHODS: Inspired by the 2010 OARSI histopathology recommendations for the rat, our laboratory has developed a GUI for the evaluation of knee OA, nicknamed GEKO. In this work, descriptions of the quantitative measures acquired by GEKO are presented and measured in 42 histological images from a rat knee OA model. Using these images, across-session and within-session reproducibility for individual graders is evaluated, and inter-grader reliability across different levels of OA severity is also assessed. RESULTS: GEKO allowed histological images to be quantitatively scored in less than 1 min per image. In addition, intra-class coefficients (ICCs) were largely above 0.8 for across-session reproducibility, within-session reproducibility, and inter-grader reliability. These data indicate GEKO aided in the reproducibility and repeatability of quantitative OA grading across graders and grading sessions. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate GEKO is a reliable and efficient method to calculate quantitative histological measures of knee OA in a rat model. GEKO reduced quantitative grading times relative to manual grading systems and allowed grader reproducibility and repeatability to be easily assessed within a grading session and across time. Moreover, GEKO is being provided as a free, open-source tool for the OA research community.
Authors: T Aigner; J L Cook; N Gerwin; S S Glasson; S Laverty; C B Little; W McIlwraith; V B Kraus Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: K P H Pritzker; S Gay; S A Jimenez; K Ostergaard; J-P Pelletier; P A Revell; D Salter; W B van den Berg Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2005-10-19 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Bridgette D Furman; Jens Strand; W Chad Hembree; Benjamin D Ward; Farshid Guilak; Steven A Olson Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Tadashi Hayami; Maureen Pickarski; Gregg A Wesolowski; Julia McLane; Ashleigh Bone; James Destefano; Gideon A Rodan; Le T Duong Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2004-04
Authors: Kyle D Allen; Kiara M Chan; Elena G Yarmola; Yash Y Shah; Brittany D Partain Journal: Connect Tissue Res Date: 2019-08-23 Impact factor: 3.417