Literature DB >> 30286911

Imaging in Heart Transplant Patients.

Michael Olymbios1, Jacek Kwiecinski2, Daniel S Berman3, Jon A Kobashigawa4.   

Abstract

Heart transplantation is an accepted treatment for select patients with end-stage heart failure. Improvements to immunosuppressive therapies and patient management have increased the half-life of heart transplant patients to over 10 years. Despite this success, rejection remains the "Achilles heel" of heart transplantation. The early detection of acute rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy are paramount to avoiding graft loss. Unlike in kidney and liver transplantation, there are no clinically validated biomarkers for detecting heart transplant rejection. Existing methods for monitoring the cardiac allograft are invasive. The endomyocardial biopsy is the standard-of-care for monitoring for acute rejection but carries risks of complications, and histologic assessment is often subjective. Equally, intracoronary angiography remains the standard-of-care for detecting cardiac allograft vasculopathy, but it is invasive and less than ideally sensitive. Newer echocardiographic techniques, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography are less invasive than conventional biopsy and show promise in excluding rejection thereby potentially decreasing the frequency of biopsies in low-risk patients. Intravascular ultrasonography and optical coherence tomography, although still invasive, improve on the assessment of the coronary tree through increased resolution, evaluation of the microvasculature, and visualization of the vessel wall. This review outlines the invasive and noninvasive imaging modalities that are employed in the routine care of heart transplant patients and examines newer techniques that are under evaluation.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Doppler; acute rejection; cardiac allograft vasculopathy; cardiac magnetic resonance; computed tomography angiography; echocardiography; heart transplantation; intravascular ultrasonography; optical coherence tomography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30286911     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.06.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  10 in total

1.  Detection of cardiac allograft vasculopathy by multi-layer left ventricular longitudinal strain in heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  C Sciaccaluga; G E Mandoli; N Sisti; M B Natali; A Ibrahim; D Menci; A D'Errico; G Donati; G Benfari; S Valente; S Bernazzali; M Maccherini; S Mondillo; M Cameli; M Focardi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Prognostic value of myocardial flow reserve obtained by 82-rubidium positron emission tomography in long-term follow-up after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Lærke Marie Nelson; Thomas Emil Christensen; Kasper Rossing; Philip Hasbak; Finn Gustafsson
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 3.  The role of non-invasive imaging modalities in cardiac allograft vasculopathy: an updated focus on current evidences.

Authors:  C Sciaccaluga; N Ghionzoli; G E Mandoli; N Sisti; F D'Ascenzi; M Focardi; S Bernazzali; G Vergaro; M Emdin; S Valente; M Cameli
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Case report on the importance of longitudinal analysis of left ventricular end-systolic volume, rather than ejection fraction, in a heart transplant patient.

Authors:  Peter L M Kerkhof; Guy R Heyndrickx
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2021-05-29

5.  Clinical Utility of SPECT in the Heart Transplant Population: Analysis From a Single Large-volume Center.

Authors:  Jack Aguilar; Robert J H Miller; Yuka Otaki; Balaji Tamarappoo; Sean Hayes; John Friedman; Piotr J Slomka; Louise E J Thomson; Michelle Kittleson; Jignesh K Patel; Jon A Kobashigawa; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 5.385

6.  Immunosuppressive effect of PLGA-FK506-NPs in treatment of acute cardiac rejection via topical subcutaneous injection.

Authors:  Cheng Deng; Qiaofeng Jin; Ya Wu; Huiling Li; Luyang Yi; Yihan Chen; Tang Gao; Wenyuan Wang; Jing Wang; Qing Lv; Yali Yang; Jia Xu; Wenpei Fu; Li Zhang; Mingxing Xie
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 6.419

Review 7.  Insight into Noninvasive Radiological Modalities to Detect Heart Transplant Rejection.

Authors:  Dhruva Sharma; Ganapathy Subramaniam; Neha Sharma; Preksha Sharma; Pooja Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2022-01-11

8.  Incremental value of preoperative right ventricular function in predicting moderate to severe acute kidney injury after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Shuangshuang Zhu; Yanting Zhang; Weihua Qiao; Yixuan Wang; Yuji Xie; Xin Zhang; Chun Wu; Guohua Wang; Yuman Li; Nianguo Dong; Mingxing Xie; Li Zhang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-09

Review 9.  The Role of Echocardiography in the Management of Heart Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Daniele Masarone; Michelle Kittleson; Rita Gravino; Fabio Valente; Andrea Petraio; Giuseppe Pacileo
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-11

10.  CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRct) for functional coronary artery evaluation in the follow-up of patients after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Ricardo P J Budde; Fay M A Nous; Stefan Roest; Alina A Constantinescu; Koen Nieman; Jasper J Brugts; Lynne M Koweek; Alexander Hirsch; Jonathon Leipsic; Olivier C Manintveld
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.