Literature DB >> 30285145

The Influence of Health Numeracy and Health Warning Label Type on Smoking Myths and Quit-Related Reactions.

Elizabeth G Klein1, Amanda J Quisenberry1, Abigail B Shoben2, Dan Romer3, Ellen Peters4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Health numeracy helps individuals understand risk information, but limited data exist concerning numeracy's role in reactions to varying types of health warning labels (HWLs) for cigarettes.
METHODS: A nationally representative online panel of adult current smokers received two exposures (1 week apart) to nine HWLs with either text-only or pictorial images with identical mandated text. Following the second exposure, participants (n = 594) rated their beliefs in smoking myths (eg, health-promoting behaviors can undo the risks of smoking) and how much the warnings made them want to quit smoking. Generalized estimating equation regression examined the relation of objective health numeracy and its interaction with HWL type to smoking-myth beliefs and quit-related reactions.
RESULTS: Health numeracy was not significantly associated with smoking-myth beliefs; the interaction with HWL type was also nonsignificant. Adult smokers with lower health numeracy had higher quit-related reactions than those with higher numeracy following exposure to HWLs. The type of HWL significantly modified numeracy's associations with quit-related reactions; no significant association existed between text-only HWLs and quit-related reactions, whereas among those who viewed the pictorial warnings, lower numeracy was associated with greater quit-related reactions (β = -.23; p < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Lower as compared to higher health numeracy was significantly associated with higher quit-related reactions to HWLs and especially with pictorial HWLs. Health numeracy and HWL type were not associated with the endorsement of smoking myths. The role of health numeracy in effectively communicating risks to smokers warrants thoughtful consideration in the development of tobacco HWLs. IMPLICATIONS: Health numeracy plays an important role in an individual's ability to understand and respond to health risks. Smokers with lower health numeracy had greater quit-related reactions to pictorial health warnings than those who viewed text-only warning labels. Development and testing of health warning labels should consider health numeracy to most effectively communicate risk to US smokers.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30285145      PMCID: PMC6588388          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nty207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  16 in total

1.  Unrealistic optimism in smokers: implications for smoking myth endorsement and self-protective motivation.

Authors:  Amanda J Dillard; Kevin D McCaul; William M P Klein
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2006

2.  Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Nathan Dieckmann; Anna Dixon; Judith H Hibbard; C K Mertz
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 3.  Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy D Berkman; Stacey L Sheridan; Katrina E Donahue; David J Halpern; Karen Crotty
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Understanding the role of numeracy in health: proposed theoretical framework and practical insights.

Authors:  Isaac M Lipkus; Ellen Peters
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2009-10-15

Review 5.  How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making.

Authors:  Valerie F Reyna; Wendy L Nelson; Paul K Han; Nathan F Dieckmann
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Cigarette warning label policy alternatives and smoking-related health disparities.

Authors:  James F Thrasher; Matthew J Carpenter; Jeannette O Andrews; Kevin M Gray; Anthony J Alberg; Ashley Navarro; Daniela B Friedman; K Michael Cummings
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 7.  The impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings: Systematic review of longitudinal observational studies.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Diane B Francis; Christy Bridges; Jennah M Sontag; Kurt M Ribisl; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Effect of risk communication formats on risk perception depending on numeracy.

Authors:  Carmen Keller; Michael Siegrist
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Adult current smoking: differences in definitions and prevalence estimates--NHIS and NSDUH, 2008.

Authors:  Heather Ryan; Angela Trosclair; Joe Gfroerer
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2012-05-09

10.  Perceptions of health risks of cigarette smoking: A new measure reveals widespread misunderstanding.

Authors:  Jon A Krosnick; Neil Malhotra; Cecilia Hyunjung Mo; Eduardo F Bruera; LinChiat Chang; Josh Pasek; Randall K Thomas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Graphic Warning Labels Affect Hypothetical Cigarette Purchasing Behavior among Smokers Living with HIV.

Authors:  Lauren R Pacek; Meredith S Berry; Olga Rass; Melissa Mercincavage; F Joseph McClernon; Matthew W Johnson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.