Literature DB >> 30283985

Tree-based networks: characterisations, metrics, and support trees.

Joan Carles Pons1, Charles Semple2, Mike Steel2.   

Abstract

Phylogenetic networks generalise phylogenetic trees and allow for the accurate representation of the evolutionary history of a set of present-day species whose past includes reticulate events such as hybridisation and lateral gene transfer. One way to obtain such a network is by starting with a (rooted) phylogenetic tree T, called a base tree, and adding arcs between arcs of T. The class of phylogenetic networks that can be obtained in this way is called tree-based networks and includes the prominent classes of tree-child and reticulation-visible networks. Initially defined for binary phylogenetic networks, tree-based networks naturally extend to arbitrary phylogenetic networks. In this paper, we generalise recent tree-based characterisations and associated proximity measures for binary phylogenetic networks to arbitrary phylogenetic networks. These characterisations are in terms of matchings in bipartite graphs, path partitions, and antichains. Some of the generalisations are straightforward to establish using the original approach, while others require a very different approach. Furthermore, for an arbitrary tree-based network N, we characterise the support trees of N, that is, the tree-based embeddings of N. We use this characterisation to give an explicit formula for the number of support trees of N when N is binary. This formula is written in terms of the components of a bipartite graph.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bipartite graph; Matching; Nonbinary; Phylogenetic network; Support tree; Tree-based network

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30283985     DOI: 10.1007/s00285-018-1296-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  13 in total

1.  Phylogenetic Networks with Every Embedded Phylogenetic Tree a Base Tree.

Authors:  Charles Semple
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 1.758

2.  Pattern pluralism and the Tree of Life hypothesis.

Authors:  W Ford Doolittle; Eric Bapteste
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Comparison of tree-child phylogenetic networks.

Authors:  Gabriel Cardona; Francesc Rosselló; Gabriel Valiente
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  On Determining if Tree-based Networks Contain Fixed Trees.

Authors:  Maria Anaya; Olga Anipchenko-Ulaj; Aisha Ashfaq; Joyce Chiu; Mahedi Kaiser; Max Shoji Ohsawa; Megan Owen; Ella Pavlechko; Katherine St John; Shivam Suleria; Keith Thompson; Corrine Yap
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 1.758

5.  On Tree-Based Phylogenetic Networks.

Authors:  Louxin Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 1.479

6.  A distance metric for a class of tree-sibling phylogenetic networks.

Authors:  Gabriel Cardona; Mercè Llabrés; Francesc Rosselló; Gabriel Valiente
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Ancient hybridizations among the ancestral genomes of bread wheat.

Authors:  Thomas Marcussen; Simen R Sandve; Lise Heier; Manuel Spannagl; Matthias Pfeifer; Kjetill S Jakobsen; Brande B H Wulff; Burkhard Steuernagel; Klaus F X Mayer; Odd-Arne Olsen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The tree of one percent.

Authors:  Tal Dagan; William Martin
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Which Phylogenetic Networks are Merely Trees with Additional Arcs?

Authors:  Andrew R Francis; Mike Steel
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 15.683

10.  Tree-Based Unrooted Phylogenetic Networks.

Authors:  A Francis; K T Huber; V Moulton
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 1.758

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.