Literature DB >> 30283751

Evaluation of Central Blood Pressure in an Asian Population: Comparison between Brachial Oscillometry and Radial Tonometry Methods.

Satoshi Hoshide1, Takahiro Komori1, Yukiyo Ogata1, Kazuo Eguchi1, Kazuomi Kario1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New devices have recently been developed using various features of the waveform derived from a brachial cuff for noninvasive estimation of central systolic blood pressure (SBP). Central SBP estimated from brachial oscillometry has never been compared with that estimated from radial tonometry in a Japanese population. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We recruited 155 Japanese volunteers (mean age 58 ± 16 years, range 18-99 years; 66.5$ women) and estimated their central SBP using brachial oscillometry (Mobil-O-Graph) or radial tonometry (SphygmoCor).
RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation) peripheral SBP and central SBP measured with brachial oscillometry was 128 ± 18 mm Hg and 118 ± 16 mm Hg, respectively, while the central SBP estimated using radial tonometry was 119 ± 18 mm Hg. The mean (standard deviation) difference in estimated central SBP between brachial oscillometry and radial tonometry was 0.36 ± 5.9 mm Hg, and the central SBPs estimated using these devices were strongly correlated (r = 0.946, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.940, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Central SBP estimated using brachial oscillometry was similar to that estimated from radial tonometry in a Japanese population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asian population; Central blood pressure

Year:  2018        PMID: 30283751      PMCID: PMC6140598          DOI: 10.1159/000484442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pulse (Basel)        ISSN: 2235-8668


  12 in total

1.  Differential impact of blood pressure-lowering drugs on central aortic pressure and clinical outcomes: principal results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) study.

Authors:  Bryan Williams; Peter S Lacy; Simon M Thom; Kennedy Cruickshank; Alice Stanton; David Collier; Alun D Hughes; H Thurston; Michael O'Rourke
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Oscillometric estimation of central blood pressure: validation of the Mobil-O-Graph in comparison with the SphygmoCor device.

Authors:  Wolfgang Weiss; Christopher Gohlisch; Christl Harsch-Gladisch; Markus Tölle; Walter Zidek; Markus van der Giet
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.444

3.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Axel Buchner; Albert-Georg Lang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

4.  Validation of a brachial cuff-based method for estimating central systolic blood pressure.

Authors:  Thomas Weber; Siegfried Wassertheurer; Martin Rammer; Edwin Maurer; Bernhard Hametner; Christopher C Mayer; Johannes Kropf; Bernd Eber
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Reference values in white Europeans for the arterial pulse wave recorded by means of the SphygmoCor device.

Authors:  Wiktoria Wojciechowska; Jan A Staessen; Tim Nawrot; Marcin Cwynar; Jitka Seidlerová; Katarzyna Stolarz; Jerzy Gasowski; Milena Tichá; Tom Richart; Lutgarde Thijs; Tomasz Grodzicki; Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz; Jan Filipovský
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.872

6.  National standard for measurement of resting and ambulatory blood pressures with automated sphygmomanometers.

Authors:  W B White; A S Berson; C Robbins; M J Jamieson; L M Prisant; E Roccella; S G Sheps
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  Central but not brachial blood pressure predicts cardiovascular events in an unselected geriatric population: the ICARe Dicomano Study.

Authors:  Riccardo Pini; M Chiara Cavallini; Vittorio Palmieri; Niccolò Marchionni; Mauro Di Bari; Richard B Devereux; Giulio Masotti; Mary J Roman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Central pressure more strongly relates to vascular disease and outcome than does brachial pressure: the Strong Heart Study.

Authors:  Mary J Roman; Richard B Devereux; Jorge R Kizer; Elisa T Lee; James M Galloway; Tauqeer Ali; Jason G Umans; Barbara V Howard
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Reference values for the arterial pulse wave in Chinese.

Authors:  Yan Li; Jan A Staessen; L H Li; Q F Huang; Lu Lu; J G Wang
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 2.689

10.  Reference values for SphygmoCor measurements in South Africans of African ancestry.

Authors:  Cleopatra P Shiburi; Jan A Staessen; Muzi Maseko; Wiktoria Wojciechowska; Lutgarde Thijs; Luc M Van Bortel; Angela J Woodiwiss; Gavin R Norton
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.689

View more
  3 in total

1.  Immediate post-exercise blood pressure and arterial stiffness in hypertensive and normotensive older females.

Authors:  Eduardo C Costa; Rodrigo A V Browne; Marcyo Câmara; Geovani A D Macêdo; Bruno E B Lucena; Lauro C Vianna; Todd A Duhamel
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.885

2.  Twenty-Four-Hour Central (Aortic) Systolic Blood Pressure: Reference Values and Dipping Patterns in Untreated Individuals.

Authors:  Thomas Weber; Athanase D Protogerou; Mohsen Agharazii; Antonis Argyris; Sola Aoun Bahous; Jose R Banegas; Ronald K Binder; Jacques Blacher; Andréa Araujo Brandao; Juan J Cruz; Kathrin Danninger; Cristina Giannatasio; Auxiliadora Graciani; Bernhard Hametner; Piotr Jankowski; Yan Li; Alessandro Maloberti; Christopher C Mayer; Barry J McDonnell; Carmel M McEniery; Marco Antonio Mota Gomes; Annelise Machado Gomes; Maria Lorenza Muiesan; Janos Nemcsik; Anna Paini; Enrique Rodilla; Aletta E Schutte; Petros P Sfikakis; Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios; Alexandre Vallée; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; Lisa Ware; Ian Wilkinson; Robert Zweiker; James E Sharman; Siegfried Wassertheurer
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Pulse wave velocity in South African women and children: comparison between the Mobil-O-Graph and SphygmoCor XCEL devices.

Authors:  Andrea Kolkenbeck-Ruh; Larske Marit Soepnel; Andrew Wooyoung Kim; Sanushka Naidoo; Wayne Smith; Justine Davies; Lisa Jayne Ware
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.844

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.