BACKGROUND: New devices have recently been developed using various features of the waveform derived from a brachial cuff for noninvasive estimation of central systolic blood pressure (SBP). Central SBP estimated from brachial oscillometry has never been compared with that estimated from radial tonometry in a Japanese population. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We recruited 155 Japanese volunteers (mean age 58 ± 16 years, range 18-99 years; 66.5$ women) and estimated their central SBP using brachial oscillometry (Mobil-O-Graph) or radial tonometry (SphygmoCor). RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation) peripheral SBP and central SBP measured with brachial oscillometry was 128 ± 18 mm Hg and 118 ± 16 mm Hg, respectively, while the central SBP estimated using radial tonometry was 119 ± 18 mm Hg. The mean (standard deviation) difference in estimated central SBP between brachial oscillometry and radial tonometry was 0.36 ± 5.9 mm Hg, and the central SBPs estimated using these devices were strongly correlated (r = 0.946, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.940, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Central SBP estimated using brachial oscillometry was similar to that estimated from radial tonometry in a Japanese population.
BACKGROUND: New devices have recently been developed using various features of the waveform derived from a brachial cuff for noninvasive estimation of central systolic blood pressure (SBP). Central SBP estimated from brachial oscillometry has never been compared with that estimated from radial tonometry in a Japanese population. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We recruited 155 Japanese volunteers (mean age 58 ± 16 years, range 18-99 years; 66.5$ women) and estimated their central SBP using brachial oscillometry (Mobil-O-Graph) or radial tonometry (SphygmoCor). RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation) peripheral SBP and central SBP measured with brachial oscillometry was 128 ± 18 mm Hg and 118 ± 16 mm Hg, respectively, while the central SBP estimated using radial tonometry was 119 ± 18 mm Hg. The mean (standard deviation) difference in estimated central SBP between brachial oscillometry and radial tonometry was 0.36 ± 5.9 mm Hg, and the central SBPs estimated using these devices were strongly correlated (r = 0.946, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.940, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Central SBP estimated using brachial oscillometry was similar to that estimated from radial tonometry in a Japanese population.
Entities:
Keywords:
Asian population; Central blood pressure
Authors: Bryan Williams; Peter S Lacy; Simon M Thom; Kennedy Cruickshank; Alice Stanton; David Collier; Alun D Hughes; H Thurston; Michael O'Rourke Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-02-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Wolfgang Weiss; Christopher Gohlisch; Christl Harsch-Gladisch; Markus Tölle; Walter Zidek; Markus van der Giet Journal: Blood Press Monit Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 1.444
Authors: Thomas Weber; Siegfried Wassertheurer; Martin Rammer; Edwin Maurer; Bernhard Hametner; Christopher C Mayer; Johannes Kropf; Bernd Eber Journal: Hypertension Date: 2011-09-12 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Wiktoria Wojciechowska; Jan A Staessen; Tim Nawrot; Marcin Cwynar; Jitka Seidlerová; Katarzyna Stolarz; Jerzy Gasowski; Milena Tichá; Tom Richart; Lutgarde Thijs; Tomasz Grodzicki; Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz; Jan Filipovský Journal: Hypertens Res Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 3.872
Authors: Riccardo Pini; M Chiara Cavallini; Vittorio Palmieri; Niccolò Marchionni; Mauro Di Bari; Richard B Devereux; Giulio Masotti; Mary J Roman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-06-24 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Mary J Roman; Richard B Devereux; Jorge R Kizer; Elisa T Lee; James M Galloway; Tauqeer Ali; Jason G Umans; Barbara V Howard Journal: Hypertension Date: 2007-05-07 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Cleopatra P Shiburi; Jan A Staessen; Muzi Maseko; Wiktoria Wojciechowska; Lutgarde Thijs; Luc M Van Bortel; Angela J Woodiwiss; Gavin R Norton Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Eduardo C Costa; Rodrigo A V Browne; Marcyo Câmara; Geovani A D Macêdo; Bruno E B Lucena; Lauro C Vianna; Todd A Duhamel Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2022-05-18 Impact factor: 2.885
Authors: Thomas Weber; Athanase D Protogerou; Mohsen Agharazii; Antonis Argyris; Sola Aoun Bahous; Jose R Banegas; Ronald K Binder; Jacques Blacher; Andréa Araujo Brandao; Juan J Cruz; Kathrin Danninger; Cristina Giannatasio; Auxiliadora Graciani; Bernhard Hametner; Piotr Jankowski; Yan Li; Alessandro Maloberti; Christopher C Mayer; Barry J McDonnell; Carmel M McEniery; Marco Antonio Mota Gomes; Annelise Machado Gomes; Maria Lorenza Muiesan; Janos Nemcsik; Anna Paini; Enrique Rodilla; Aletta E Schutte; Petros P Sfikakis; Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios; Alexandre Vallée; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; Lisa Ware; Ian Wilkinson; Robert Zweiker; James E Sharman; Siegfried Wassertheurer Journal: Hypertension Date: 2021-11-15 Impact factor: 10.190