Literature DB >> 30282056

Community Study of Outcome Monitoring for Emotional Disorders in Teens (COMET): A comparative effectiveness trial of a transdiagnostic treatment and a measurement feedback system.

Amanda Jensen-Doss1, Jill Ehrenreich-May2, Monica M Nanda2, Colleen A Maxwell2, Jamie LoCurto3, Ashley M Shaw2, Heather Souer3, David Rosenfield4, Golda S Ginsburg3.   

Abstract

Emotional disorders, encompassing a range of anxiety and depressive disorders, are the most prevalent and comorbid psychiatric disorders in adolescence. Unfortunately, evidence-based psychosocial therapies typically focus on single disorders, are rarely adopted by community mental health center clinicians, and effect sizes are modest. This article describes the protocol for a comparative effectiveness study of two novel interventions designed to address these challenges. The first intervention is a transdiagnostic treatment (the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Adolescents, UP-A), a promising new approach that uses a small number of common strategies to treat a broad range of emotional disorders, and their underlying shared emotional vulnerabilities. The second intervention is a standardized measurement feedback system, the Youth Outcomes Questionnaire (YOQ), designed to improve clinical decision making using weekly symptom and relational data. The three study arms are treatment as usual (TAU), TAU plus the YOQ (TAU+), and UP-A (used in combination with the YOQ). The primary aims of the study are to [1] compare the effects of the UP-A and TAU+ to TAU in community mental health clinics, [2] to isolate the effects of measurement and feedback by comparing the UP-A and TAU+ condition, and [3] to examine the mechanisms of action of both interventions. Design considerations and study methods are provided to inform future effectiveness research.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Effectiveness research; Internalizing disorders; Randomized controlled trial; Treatment effectiveness

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30282056      PMCID: PMC6249684          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  53 in total

Review 1.  Progress feedback and the OQ-system: The past and the future.

Authors:  Michael J Lambert
Journal:  Psychotherapy (Chic)       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  The Origins of Neuroticism.

Authors:  David H Barlow; Kristen K Ellard; Shannon Sauer-Zavala; Jacqueline R Bullis; Jenna R Carl
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-09

3.  A self-report symptom and problem rating scale to increase inpatients' involvement in treatment.

Authors:  S V Eisen; B Dickey; L I Sederer
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Authors:  K Kroenke; R L Spitzer; J B Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Routine outcome monitoring and feedback on physical or mental health status: evidence and theory.

Authors:  Ingrid V E Carlier; Denise Meuldijk; Irene M Van Vliet; Esther Van Fenema; Nic J A Van der Wee; Frans G Zitman
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  Youth psychotherapy change trajectories and early warning system accuracy in a managed care setting.

Authors:  Philip L Nelson; Jared S Warren; Robert L Gleave; Gary M Burlingame
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  2013-02-04

7.  A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial of the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Children.

Authors:  Sarah M Kennedy; Emily L Bilek; Jill Ehrenreich-May
Journal:  Behav Modif       Date:  2018-01-27

Review 8.  Predictors of treatment response in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  Golda S Ginsburg; Julie Newman Kingery; Kelly L Drake; Marco A Grados
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 8.829

9.  Validity of brief alcohol screening tests among adolescents: a comparison of the AUDIT, POSIT, CAGE, and CRAFFT.

Authors:  John R Knight; Lon Sherritt; Sion Kim Harris; Elizabeth C Gates; Grace Chang
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  Performance of evidence-based youth psychotherapies compared with usual clinical care: a multilevel meta-analysis.

Authors:  John R Weisz; Sofie Kuppens; Dikla Eckshtain; Ana M Ugueto; Kristin M Hawley; Amanda Jensen-Doss
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 21.596

View more
  5 in total

1.  Measurement-based care as a practice improvement tool: Clinical and organizational applications in youth mental health.

Authors:  Amanda Jensen-Doss; Susan Douglas; Dominique A Phillips; Ozgur Gencdur; Amber Zalman; Noelle Elena Gomez
Journal:  Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health       Date:  2020-08-18

2.  Evidence Base Update for Brief, Free, and Accessible Youth Mental Health Measures.

Authors:  Emily M Becker-Haimes; Alexandra R Tabachnick; Briana S Last; Rebecca E Stewart; Anisa Hasan-Granier; Rinad S Beidas
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2019-12-11

Review 3.  Psychological Treatments for Depression in Adolescents: More Than Three Decades Later.

Authors:  Javier Méndez; Óscar Sánchez-Hernández; Judy Garber; José P Espada; Mireia Orgilés
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  WHO Participates in Effectiveness Research? A Comparison of Effectiveness Trial Clinicians to National Survey Samples.

Authors:  Zabin S Patel; Dominique Philips; Elizabeth Casline; Gregory A Aarons; Colleen A Maxwell; Golda S Ginsburg; Jill Ehrenreich-May; Amanda Jensen-Doss
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2022-06-14

5.  Long-term effectiveness and trajectories of change after treatment with SMART, a transdiagnostic CBT for adolescents with emotional problems.

Authors:  Veronica Lorentzen; Kenneth Fagermo; Bjørn Helge Handegård; Simon-Peter Neumer; Ingunn Skre
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2022-07-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.