Literature DB >> 30281806

Deceased Pediatric Donor Livers: How Current Policy Drives Allocation and Transplantation.

Jin Ge1, Evelyn K Hsu2, John Bucuvalas3, Jennifer C Lai1.   

Abstract

Each year, approximately 60 children, representing 12% of waitlist candidates, die awaiting liver transplantation. The current allocation algorithm for pediatric donor livers prioritizes local/regional adults over national children. We attempted to better understand the impact of the present algorithm on pediatric candidates. We analyzed pediatric donor liver offers from 2010 to 2014. Donors and recipients were classified based on age. We mapped allocation and acceptance patterns and used subgroup analyses to explore the significance of donor service areas (DSAs) with low pediatric transplant volumes. We used Cox proportional hazard regressions to evaluate posttransplantation outcomes: 3,318 pediatric donor livers were transplanted into 3,482 recipients, and 45% (1,569) were adults. Of the 1,569 adults, 25% (390) received a pediatric organ that was never offered to children; 52% (204) of these 390 pediatric organs originated in the 37 DSAs, with ≤25 pediatric liver transplantations; 278 children died or were delisted due to illness during the same time, with higher mortality rates in the 37 DSAs (10% versus 6%, P < 0.01). Compared to adults, pediatric recipients aged <12 years had lower risks of posttransplant mortality (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.81; P < 0.01). Conclusions: We found that 45% of pediatric donor livers were transplanted into adults: 390 adults were transplanted with pediatric organs never offered to children, while 278 children died or were delisted due to illness, which was more apparent in DSAs with low pediatric transplant volumes; we advocate for a change to allocation policies to allow pediatric organs to be offered to national children with status 1B or Model for End-Stage Liver Disease/Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease >15 before being offered to local/regional + circle non-status 1A adults.
© 2018 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30281806      PMCID: PMC6881175          DOI: 10.1002/hep.30295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  8 in total

Review 1.  Organ donation in the United States.

Authors:  Howard M Nathan; Suzanne L Conrad; Philip J Held; Keith P McCullough; Richard E Pietroski; Laura A Siminoff; Akinlolu O Ojo
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Patient, center and geographic characteristics of nationally placed livers.

Authors:  J C Lai; J P Roberts; E Vittinghoff; N A Terrault; S Feng
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Analysis of Liver Offers to Pediatric Candidates on the Transplant Wait List.

Authors:  Evelyn K Hsu; Michele L Shaffer; Lucy Gao; Christopher Sonnenday; Michael L Volk; John Bucuvalas; Jennifer C Lai
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Pediatric Liver Transplant Center Volume and the Likelihood of Transplantation.

Authors:  Abbas Rana; Zachary Pallister; Karim Halazun; Ronald Cotton; Jacfranz Guiteau; Courtney C Nalty; Christine A O'Mahony; John A Goss
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Changes in liver acceptance patterns after implementation of Share 35.

Authors:  Kenneth Washburn; Ann Harper; Timothy Baker; Erick Edwards
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.799

6.  OPTN/SRTR 2016 Annual Data Report: Liver.

Authors:  W R Kim; J R Lake; J M Smith; D P Schladt; M A Skeans; A M Harper; J L Wainright; J J Snyder; A K Israni; B L Kasiske
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Share 35 changes in center-level liver acceptance practices.

Authors:  David S Goldberg; Matthew Levine; Seth Karp; Richard Gilroy; Peter L Abt
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.799

8.  Receipt of a pediatric liver offer as the first offer reduces waitlist mortality for adult women.

Authors:  Jin Ge; Richard Gilroy; Jennifer C Lai
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2018-05-20       Impact factor: 17.425

  8 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Save the Children: The Ethical Argument for Preferential Priority to Minors in Deceased Donor Liver Allocation.

Authors:  Evelyn Hsu; Emily R Perito; George Mazariegos
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-05-01

2.  Split liver transplantation is utilized infrequently and concentrated at few transplant centers in the United States.

Authors:  Jin Ge; Emily R Perito; John Bucuvalas; Richard Gilroy; Evelyn K Hsu; John P Roberts; Jennifer C Lai
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Living Donor Versus Deceased Donor Pediatric Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arianna Barbetta; Chanté Butler; Sarah Barhouma; Rachel Hogen; Brittany Rocque; Cameron Goldbeck; Hannah Schilperoort; Glenda Meeberg; James Shapiro; Yong K Kwon; Rohit Kohli; Juliet Emamaullee
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2021-09-20

4.  Outcomes in Adult Liver Transplant Recipients Using Pediatric Deceased Donor Liver Grafts.

Authors:  Paola A Vargas; Haowei Wang; Christina Dalzell; Curtis Argo; Zachary Henry; Feng Su; Matthew J Stotts; Patrick Northup; Jose Oberholzer; Shawn Pelletier; Nicolas Goldaracena
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2022-04-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.