Literature DB >> 30281761

Profile of medical students in the first group of the Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein.

Ângela Tavares Paes1, Bruna de Freitas Dias1, Giulia Nicolucci Eleutério1, Vitória Penido de Paula1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe first medical students' profile of the Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein.
METHODS: Data were collected using an electronic questionnaire during the Biostatistics course in August of 2016. The students were inquired about demographic characteristics, data on their secondary education and college entrance exams, practice of physical exercise, leisure activities done, to have a physician in the family, and specialty that they intended to pursue as a career.
RESULTS: Most of the students were women aged 18 to 21 years and who were originally from the state of São Paulo, had received secondary education in a private school, took a course to prepare for college entrance exam, and participated in more than 5 college entrance exams in the same year they entered in the School of Medicine. The majority of participants practiced physical exercise regularly and were engaged in common leisure activities. Most of students (58%) had a physician in the family and more than half (52%) did not know which specialty to pursue as career. There was no association between relationship with a physician and the student's choice of a specialty (p=0.390).
CONCLUSION: Although it was the first group of student of School of Medicine at Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein who took a different admission process, our data showed that students' profile is similar to students from other colleges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30281761      PMCID: PMC6178853          DOI: 10.1590/S1679-45082018AO4228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)        ISSN: 1679-4508


INTRODUCTION

In Brazil in last year of secondary school many students are preparing to the vestibular - an entrance exam used by the Brazilian universities for their admission processes. In addition, at this time, students have to decide what course and college or university to attend. Among other options, the medical course in Brazil has one of the highest demand and, therefore, it is highly competitive for applicants to get into. In general, a student entering in a medical undergraduate course has high technical ability, but not always he/she has the adequate profile to pursue a medical career. According to the guidelines of medical course curriculum established by the Brazilian Ministry of Education, a student should leave school of medicine with a general knowledge including issues related with humanization, critical, reflexive and ethical thinking, he/she must have the ability to work in different levels of health care promotion, prevention and recovery actions. In addition, students must understand health rehabilitation in an individual and collective perspective, his/her social responsibility and commitment with citizenship defense of human dignity, and delivery integral human-centered health care and promote a clinical practice always focused on social determinants of health and disease.( ) This guideline suggests that medical students must be exposed to more than comprehensive and technical knowledge that is part of medical course curriculum. After investigate admission processes of the main medical courses in Brazil, we observed that a variety of entrance exam types exist with different tests occurring in a single phase test, such as in the Marilia Medical School (FAMEMA) and Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (FAMERP), both which accept the Brazil's Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (ENEM) as entrance exam. And those with double phase test such as Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” (UNESP), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) and the Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein (FICSAE). Exams can include multiple choices questions in the first phase and open-ended questions in the second phase. In addition, some entrance exam, especially those adopting a single day test, can include more than one type of question, and these exams can also include argumentative essay or different type of texts writing. Although many efforts are made to select students with higher critical ability, medical school entrance exams in Brazil often use selection methods that prioritize measurement of applicants’ cognitive skills. In 2016, the FICSAE started a medical undergraduate course with a proposal of new teaching method and a different admission process that uses a non-cognitive assessment to assess applicants’ skills such as critical thinking, teamwork, communication, motivation and ethics. This admission process includes two phases: the first phase involves the assessment of academic competence using objective tests and open-ended questions,( ) and the second phase the approved applicants in the first phase undergo multiple mini interviews (MMI).( ) Multiple mini interviews are structured time-controlled interviews. This type of admission, which is a new approach in Brazil, is currently used in Canada and United Kingdom, and in more than 30 medical schools in the United States. The aim of the method is to highlight non-cognitive abilities in both human and professional aspect by provide more value to competency and passion, effective communication, empathy, critical thinking, ethics, leadership, teamwork and motivation.( ) In addition to differentiated admissions criteria, the FICSAE uses as main the teaching method the team-based learning (TBL).( , ) The TBL involves students proactivity in which they need to come to class with previous studied content, and team activities with emphasis on the medical practice. Although these active method would be present in most of the medical school, the TBL specifically, still little known. Of 52 medical schools in São Paulo State, 19 (36%) describes in pedagogy project the use of the active methodologies. Of these, 10 (52.6%) adopted the problem-based learning (PBL),( ) which is difference of TBL in a number of aspects, such as existence of readiness assurance test and supervision done by a single faculty member to all student groups. The characteristics of the admission process and teaching method aligned with fact that starting of a new undergraduate course turn interesting to determine the profile of entrance students. The description of students’ profile can provide interesting information for both general and education professionals audience.

OBJECTIVE

To describe profile of the first year students of the School of Medicine at Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein by considering sociodemographic characteristics, information from students’ secondary education, entrance exams, practice of physical exercise, leisure activities done, having a physician in the family, specialty that they intend to pursue and availability to participate in academic activities.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional descriptive study with a quantitative approach. We included 50 students who made up the first student group admitted in the School of Medicine at FICSAE, which started in the first semester of 2016. A Google form was created to collect opinion. The form was fulfilled by students who volunteered during a biostatistics class. The first proposed questionnaire included multiple open-ended questions, but it was difficult for data processing. After organization a database by creating a forum for discussion, students provided feedback and proposed improvements. The second questionnaire included 23 questions (Appendix 1). This second questionnaire was applied again, and data collected were used during class as an example to introduce the concept of descriptive statistics. All respondents of the study signed a consent form. Ethics committee approval was not required for our study based on resolution 510/16.

RESULTS

Sociodemographic characteristics and information of candidates before admission in the school of medicine are described in table 1 and 2. The majority of applicants included were women (74%). Students’ mean age was 20.3 years (standard deviation - SD=2.1) and they age ranged between 17 and 29 years (Figure 1). The majority of students (80%) was from Southeast region, 76% was from São Paulo State, and 23 students (46%) were born in the city of São Paulo. Of those who was born in other cities, 10 moved from their home city to study for the entrance exam. Most of students were catholic (42%) and 11 (22%) did not have religion.
Table 1

Sociodemographic characteristics of candidates

Variablen (%)
Sex
Man13 (26.0)
Woman37 (74.0)
Age range
Younger than 18 years3 (6.0)
Between 18 and 21 years34 (68.0)
Older than 21 years13 (26.0)
State of origin
São Paulo38 (76.0)
Other states12 (24.0)
Region of origin
Southeast* 40 (80.0)
Central-West 7 (14.0)
South 2 (4.0)
Northeast§ 1 (2.0)
Religion
Catholic21 (42.0)
No religion11 (22.0)
Atheism3(6.0)
Spiritist2 (4.0)
Protestant1 (2.0)
Paganism1 (2.0)
Candomblé - Afro-American religion1 (2.0)
Evangelist1 (2.0)
No information9 (18.0)

38 were from São Paulo and 2 from Minas Gerais;

4 from Goias; 2 from Mato Grosso and 1 from Mato Grosso do Sul;

1 from Parana and 1 from Rio Grande do Sul;

Maranhão.

Table 2

Data of applicants on secondary education and entrance exam

Variablesn (%)
Type of school in which the student attended the secondary education
Private49 (98.0)
Part in public and part in private school1 (2.0)
Time - in years - since the conclusion of the secondary education
18 (16.0)
217 (34.0)
310 (20.0)
48 (16.0)
5 or more7 (14.0)
Does student attend preparatory course for entrance exam?
Yes43 (86.0)
No7 (14.0)
Number of entrance exam done*
Less than 4
42 (4.0)
5 or more48 (96.0)
What entrance exam you took in addition to the FICSAE exam?
FUVEST46 (92.0)
UNICAMP43 (86.0)
UNIFESP42 (84.0)
UNESP40 (80.0)
Other São Paulo States with its own entrance exam34 (68.0)
Other public universities/colleges out of the São Paulo State26 (52.0)
Other universities/colleges in São Paulo State that use the Sisu score - a unified selection system in Brazil14 (28.0)
Other private universities/colleges out of the São Paulo State7 (14.0)

In the year of admission;

multiple answer.

FICSAE: Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein; FUVEST: Fundação Universitária para o Vestibular; UNICAMP: Universidade Estadual de Campinas; UNIFESP: Universidade Federal de São Paulo; UNESP: Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”.

Figure 1

Distribution of new students by age (in years) and sex

38 were from São Paulo and 2 from Minas Gerais; 4 from Goias; 2 from Mato Grosso and 1 from Mato Grosso do Sul; 1 from Parana and 1 from Rio Grande do Sul; Maranhão. In the year of admission; multiple answer. FICSAE: Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein; FUVEST: Fundação Universitária para o Vestibular; UNICAMP: Universidade Estadual de Campinas; UNIFESP: Universidade Federal de São Paulo; UNESP: Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”. Forty-nine students (98%) studied in private schools. On average, students had concluded secondary school 3 years ago (SD=1.9), only seven (14%) did not use pre admission exam and all took at least four other entrance exams. The mainly college entrance exams done by students were FUVEST (92%), UNICAMP (86%), and UNIFESP (84%). When students were inquired about subjects they liked most and least in secondary education (Figure 2), most liked subjects were Biology (72%) and Chemistry (58%). We also observed that most of students mentioned History as of the subject that they liked most. Among courses that students liked least were geographic (40%), mathematics (36%) and Physics (34%), however, the two latter were also mentioned as subjects that some of them liked most.
Figure 2

Disciplines that students liked most and least during secondary education

Among students, 64% reported to do some physical exercise, and 38% of them exercise two or three times a week (Table 3). Most of them exercise in a gym, 54% did weight training or collective exercise, and 24% did run-walk exercise. In terms of leisure activities, 41 students mentioned sleeping (82%), go to the movies (72%), and watching TV (68%).
Table 3

Data on physical exercise and leisure activities of new students

Variablesn (%)
Physical exercise
Yes32 (64.0)
No18 (36.0)
Frequency of physical exercise per week
Up to once weekly7 (14.0)
2-3 times a week19 (38.0)
≥4 times a week6 (12.0)
What physical exercise do you do?
Gym (weight training /collective exercise)27 (54.0)
Running/walking12 (24.0)
Swimming3(6.0)
Soccer2 (4.0)
Tennis2 (4.0)
Dance1 (2.0)
Handball1 (2.0)
Other1 (2.0)
Fighting (boxing and taekwondo)1 (2.0)
Pilates1 (2.0)
Leisure activities
Sleeping41 (82.0)
Go to the movies36 (72.0)
Watching TV34 (68.0)
Dance club (bars/night clubs)31 (62.0)
Reading23 (46.0)
Parks19 (38.0)
Go shopping19 (38.0)
Sports18 (36.0)
Visit relatives17 (34.0)
Date with boyfriend/girlfriend16 (32.0)
Live shows16 (32.0)
Almost 60% of students had one physician in the family, and for 24% of them the mother or father was physician. We observed that most students who had a physician in the family were those living in different region from the Southeast (8/10 = 80%). More than half of students (52%) did not know what specialty they would pretend to pursue in medical career, among those who already know, the choice varied (Table 4). The choice of the specialty (to know or not) was not associated with the specialty of the physician in the family (χ2 test; p=0.390).
Table 4

Relationship of students with medicine

Variablesn (%)
To have a physician in the family
Yes29 (58.0)
No21 (42.0)
Students' family ties with a physician
Father/mother12 (24.0)
Uncle/Aunt10 (20.0)
Other9 (18.0)
Grandparents5 (10.0)
Medical specialty that students wished to pursue as a medical career
Do not know26 (52.0)
Oncology4 (8.0)
Psychiatry4 (8.0)
Cardiology2 (4.0)
Medical genetics2 (4.0)
Neurosurgery2 (4.0)
Pediatrics2 (4.0)
Surgery1 (2.0)
Cardiovascular surgery1 (2.0)
Head and Neck Surgery1 (2.0)
Prenatal/pediatrics surgery1 (2.0)
Gastroenterology1 (2.0)
Gynecology and Obstetrics1 (2.0)
Legal and Forensic medicine1 (2.0)
Radiology and imaging diagnosis1 (2.0)

DISCUSSION

The decision to attend the first group of private School of medicine is not simple, especially for the insecurity to invest in a new school that was not evaluated in terms of quality by the national higher education assessment system, which is the case of FICSAE. Our school of medicine there has an extra challenge because of the new educational method and admission process adopted that, in a certain way, is subjective. No specific characteristics were observed in the first group of new students at FICSAE that differed extensively from medical students from other universities.( – ) The majority of students were women - a fact not observed in previous studies.( – ) But our results agree with the growing tendency in Brazil in the last years of women seeking a career in medicine,( ) however, in the students at FICSAE, we observed that, so far, there are no standard in terms of distribution among sexes. An evidence of this diversity is what was observed in the subsequent groups of new students in which the second group had 70.5% of women and third group had 46.2%. For college education, students often seek institutions not so far from their home city. In our study, therefore, most of students were from the Southeast region. Although it was not part of the questionnaire, we inquired students from other regions about reasons to move to the city of São Paulo to attend college. The reason mentioned by students who did so was that in their region medical school of the State of São Paulo are well known for providing education with better quality compared with other states. In addition, some students reported not only family encouragement but also by coordinators of the secondary school they attended. Most of student who moved to São Paulo and had a physician in the family, and who were already in the career, reported that his/her relative encouragement also contributed to their decision of moving to São Paulo to study. The ease access to the capital of São Paulo by plane was also mentioned as a reason to choice the city for college education - which is not so ease in university or colleges in countryside. An important fact concerning religion was that many students (28%) reported to be atheist or have no religion. This percentage was higher than what is observed among population from São Paulo (which proportion of atheists and those with no religion is 9% - according to the last census reported by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics - IBGE). The most common religion reported was Catholicism, an expected finding among Brazilian population that majority is catholic; around 60% of the population. Therefore, although FICSAE in a Jewish institution, this fact seemed not to influence the choice of students based on their religion preference. Other expected data was that most of student attended secondary education in a private school. This expectation is given to the fact that students from private schools have higher access index in best colleges, and very competitive courses such as medicine. The number of previous attempts in entrance exams before formal entering in the school of medicine that was observed in our study is proof of level of difficulty of entrance exams for medical undergraduate courses. We observed that most of students who had a physician in their family, and, different from what we expected, having a physician as a relative, did not influence the student's preference to pursue a specific medical specialty as a career. Proportion of new students who did not know what specialty to follow was similar to finding reported in another study including students from fifth year of school of medicine.( ) The preference of students for resting during leisure times can be justified because they were experiencing an intense period of dedication for studies. However, the practice of regular exercise was frequent in among students and higher than the frequency reported in a similar study carried out by medical students from other state.( ) We highlight as limitations of this study the lack of investigating socioeconomic factors and other characteristics that might enhance the description of students’ profile. However, because the questionnaire was designed to be used in a practical activity in the classroom, no specific planning was done to provide a complete description of students’ profile. The decision of not inquiring about students’ family monthly income, which is common data in other studies,( – ) was because this information might cause some type of embarrassment to them considering that data was used during an exercise in the classroom of a biostatistics course. Although students’ economic status was not included, we believe that their family monthly income is not above the average because the school of medicine at FICSAE offers financing support or student loan, and approval for these supports are based on socioeconomic criteria not only in academic achievements. We did not explore students’ expectations about medical profession, quality of the course, the active teaching-learning methodologies( ) or data related with non-cognitive aspects - a fact of extreme value in admission process at FICSAE. Other studies can approach these aspects in the future. Although assessment of mental health among medical students is currently a well discussed issue in the literature,( , ) we did not included questions on this subject because the first aim of our study was to be designed for a practical activity in the classroom. If our first aim was a scientific approach, the planning of the study would also entail instruments to approach students’ mental health given the fact that this discussion is relevance and interesting for academia and individuals involved with college admission process.

CONCLUSION

Although this was the first group of the student of the Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein and they went through an admission process that focused on non-cognitive skills, our findings show that students’ profile, based on characteristics investigated, was similar to medical students from others colleges.
  6 in total

1.  An admissions OSCE: the multiple mini-interview.

Authors:  Kevin W Eva; Jack Rosenfeld; Harold I Reiter; Geoffrey R Norman
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  [Active teaching-learning methodologies in health education: current debates].

Authors:  Sandra Minardi Mitre; Rodrigo Siqueira-Batista; José Márcio Girardi-de-Mendonça; Neila Maria de Morais-Pinto; Cynthia de Almeida Brandão Meirelles; Cláudia Pinto-Porto; Tânia Moreira; Leandro Marcial Amaral Hoffmann
Journal:  Cien Saude Colet       Date:  2008-12

3.  First experience with multiple mini interview for medical school admission in Brazil: Does it work in a different cultural scenario?

Authors:  Durval Anibal Daniel-Filho; Elda Maria Stafuzza Gonçalves Pires; Angela Tavares Paes; Eduardo Juan Troster; Simone Cristina Azevedo B S Silva; Mariana Fachini Granato; Thomaz Bittencourt Couto; Joyce Kelly Silva Barreto; Alexandre Holthausen Campos; Julio C Martins Monte; Claudio Schvartsman
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.650

4.  Problem-based, self-directed learning.

Authors:  H S Barrows
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-12-09       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  [Undergraduate students of "Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais": profile and trends].

Authors:  R A Ferreira; L A Peret Filho; E M Goulart; M M Valadão
Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)       Date:  2000-11-16       Impact factor: 1.209

Review 6.  Mental health problems among medical students in Brazil: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  João P Pacheco; Henrique T Giacomin; Wilson W Tam; Tássia B Ribeiro; Claudia Arab; Italla M Bezerra; Gustavo C Pinasco
Journal:  Braz J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.697

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.