Literature DB >> 30281086

Single-Session Mobile-Augmented Intervention in Serious Mental Illness: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.

Colin A Depp1,2, Dimitri Perivoliotis1,2, Jason Holden1, Jennifer Dorr2, Eric L Granholm1,2.   

Abstract

Psychosocial interventions for serious mental illness are resource intensive and poorly accessible. Brief interventions (eg, single session) that are augmented by follow-on automated mobile health intervention may expand treatment access. This was a randomized single-blind controlled trial with 255 individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. Participants were randomized to one of three conditions: CBT2go, which combined one individual session of cognitive behavioral therapy with automated thought challenging/adaptive behavior delivered through mobile devices; Self-Monitoring (SM), which combined single-session illness psychoeducation with self-monitoring of symptoms; and treatment-as-usual (TAU). Participants were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks (midpoint), 12 weeks (posttreatment), and 24 weeks (follow-up) with our primary outcome global psychopathology (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-expanded version [BPRS-24]), and secondary outcomes community functioning (Specific Level of Function; SLOF) and defeatist performance beliefs (DPBs). We also collected data on adverse events. Outcome analyses on the primary outcome, BPRS Total score, indicated a significant time (0-24 wk) by group interaction with significant but modest improvement comparing two active conditions (CBT2go and SM) relative to TAU. Effects of CBT2go were not different from SM. There was a significant time × group interaction with better SLOF scores in CBT2go across 24 weeks, but not in SM. There were no time-by-group effects on DPBs. DPBs decreased in the CBT2go condition but not in SM. These results indicated that single intervention augmented by mobile intervention was feasible and associated with small yet sustained effects on global psychopathology and, when inclusive of CBT, community function compared with usual care.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Internet-based treatments; bipolar disorder; depression; ecological momentary assessment; psychotherapy; schizophrenia; technology

Year:  2019        PMID: 30281086      PMCID: PMC6581143          DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sby135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Bull        ISSN: 0586-7614            Impact factor:   9.306


  33 in total

1.  SLOF: a behavioral rating scale for assessing the mentally ill.

Authors:  L C Schneider; E L Struening
Journal:  Soc Work Res Abstr       Date:  1983

2.  Defeatist beliefs as a mediator of cognitive impairment, negative symptoms, and functioning in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Paul M Grant; Aaron T Beck
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 1: test selection, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  Keith H Nuechterlein; Michael F Green; Robert S Kern; Lyle E Baade; Deanna M Barch; Jonathan D Cohen; Susan Essock; Wayne S Fenton; Frederick J Frese; James M Gold; Terry Goldberg; Robert K Heaton; Richard S E Keefe; Helena Kraemer; Raquelle Mesholam-Gately; Larry J Seidman; Ellen Stover; Daniel R Weinberger; Alexander S Young; Steven Zalcman; Stephen R Marder
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Symptom dimensions in recent-onset schizophrenia and mania: a principal components analysis of the 24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.

Authors:  J Ventura; K H Nuechterlein; K L Subotnik; D Gutkind; E A Gilbert
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2000-12-27       Impact factor: 3.222

5.  The efficacy of smartphone-based mental health interventions for depressive symptoms: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Joseph Firth; John Torous; Jennifer Nicholas; Rebekah Carney; Abhishek Pratap; Simon Rosenbaum; Jerome Sarris
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 6.  Defeatist Performance Beliefs, Negative Symptoms, and Functional Outcome in Schizophrenia: A Meta-analytic Review.

Authors:  Timothy R Campellone; Amy H Sanchez; Ann M Kring
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of cognitive therapy for low-functioning patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Paul M Grant; Gloria A Huh; Dimitri Perivoliotis; Neal M Stolar; Aaron T Beck
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2011-10-03

Review 8.  Behavioral intervention technologies: evidence review and recommendations for future research in mental health.

Authors:  David C Mohr; Michelle Nicole Burns; Stephen M Schueller; Gregory Clarke; Michael Klinkman
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.238

Review 9.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of low intensity CBT for psychosis.

Authors:  Cassie M Hazell; Mark Hayward; Kate Cavanagh; Clara Strauss
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-03-23

Review 10.  Mental Health Smartphone Apps: Review and Evidence-Based Recommendations for Future Developments.

Authors:  David Bakker; Nikolaos Kazantzis; Debra Rickwood; Nikki Rickard
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2016-03-01
View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Can Smartphone Apps Assist People with Serious Mental Illness in Taking Medications as Prescribed?

Authors:  Cynthia L Bianco; Amanda L Myers; Stephen Smagula; Karen L Fortuna
Journal:  Sleep Med Clin       Date:  2020-12-07

2.  Bridging the Digital Divide in Psychological Therapies: Observational Study of Engagement With the SlowMo Mobile App for Paranoia in Psychosis.

Authors:  Amy Hardy; Thomas Ward; Richard Emsley; Kathryn Greenwood; Daniel Freeman; David Fowler; Elizabeth Kuipers; Paul Bebbington; Philippa Garety
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2022-07-01

Review 3.  Engagement with online psychosocial interventions for psychosis: A review and synthesis of relevant factors.

Authors:  Chelsea Arnold; John Farhall; Kristi-Ann Villagonzalo; Kriti Sharma; Neil Thomas
Journal:  Internet Interv       Date:  2021-06-05

4.  Effects of perceived social status and discrimination on hope and empowerment among individuals with serious mental illnesses.

Authors:  Stephanie Langlois; Luca Pauselli; Simone Anderson; Oluwatoyin Ashekun; Samantha Ellis; JaShala Graves; Adria Zern; Ebony Gaffney; Ruth S Shim; Michael T Compton
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 3.222

5.  COVID-19, mobile health and serious mental illness.

Authors:  John Torous; Matcheri Keshavan
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Comparative efficacy of a single-session "Empowered Relief" videoconference-delivered group intervention for chronic pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Maisa S Ziadni; Steven R Anderson; Lluvia Gonzalez-Castro; Beth D Darnall
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  A Real-World Study of the Association between a Brief Group Psychoeducation and the Course of Bipolar Disorder.

Authors:  Elisabet Casellas; Beatriz Raventós; Marina Piñeiro-Ríos; Helena Navarro-Martínez; Maite Castillón-Espezel; Maria J Portella; Ana Martín-Blanco
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Engagement with a digital therapeutic for smoking cessation designed for persons with psychiatric illness fully mediates smoking outcomes in a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Julia Browne; Tate F Halverson; Roger Vilardaga
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 3.626

9.  A qualitative exploration of service user views about using digital health interventions for self-management in severe mental health problems.

Authors:  Natalie Berry; Fiona Lobban; Sandra Bucci
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 3.630

10.  Predicting engagement with an online psychosocial intervention for psychosis: Exploring individual- and intervention-level predictors.

Authors:  Chelsea Arnold; Kristi-Ann Villagonzalo; Denny Meyer; John Farhall; Fiona Foley; Michael Kyrios; Neil Thomas
Journal:  Internet Interv       Date:  2019-08-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.