Vaclav Kremen1, Benjamin H Brinkmann, Jamie J Van Gompel, Matt Stead, Erik K St Louis, Gregory A Worrell. 1. Department of Neurology, Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States of America. Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics and Cybernetics, Czech Technical University in Prague, Jugoslavskych Partyzanu 1580/3, 160 00 Prague 6, Czechia. Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States of America.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Automated behavioral state classification in intracranial EEG (iEEG) recordings may be beneficial for iEEG interpretation and quantifying sleep patterns to enable behavioral state dependent neuromodulation therapy in next generation implantable brain stimulation devices. Here, we introduce a fully automated unsupervised framework to differentiate between awake (AW), sleep (N2), and slow wave sleep (N3) using intracranial EEG (iEEG) only and validated with expert scored polysomnography. APPROACH: Data from eight patients undergoing evaluation for epilepsy surgery (age [Formula: see text], three female) with intracranial depth electrodes for iEEG monitoring were included. Spectral power features (0.1-235 Hz) spanning several frequency bands from a single electrode were used to classify behavioral states of patients into AW, N2, and N3. MAIN RESULTS: Overall, classification accuracy of 94%, with 94% sensitivity and 93% specificity across eight subjects using multiple spectral power features from a single electrode was achieved. Classification performance of N3 sleep was significantly better (95%, sensitivity 95%, specificity 93%) than that of the N2 sleep phase (87%, sensitivity 78%, specificity 96%). SIGNIFICANCE: Automated, unsupervised, and robust classification of behavioral states based on iEEG data is possible, and it is feasible to incorporate these algorithms into future implantable devices with limited computational power, memory, and number of electrodes for brain monitoring and stimulation.
OBJECTIVE: Automated behavioral state classification in intracranial EEG (iEEG) recordings may be beneficial for iEEG interpretation and quantifying sleep patterns to enable behavioral state dependent neuromodulation therapy in next generation implantable brain stimulation devices. Here, we introduce a fully automated unsupervised framework to differentiate between awake (AW), sleep (N2), and slow wave sleep (N3) using intracranial EEG (iEEG) only and validated with expert scored polysomnography. APPROACH: Data from eight patients undergoing evaluation for epilepsy surgery (age [Formula: see text], three female) with intracranial depth electrodes for iEEG monitoring were included. Spectral power features (0.1-235 Hz) spanning several frequency bands from a single electrode were used to classify behavioral states of patients into AW, N2, and N3. MAIN RESULTS: Overall, classification accuracy of 94%, with 94% sensitivity and 93% specificity across eight subjects using multiple spectral power features from a single electrode was achieved. Classification performance of N3 sleep was significantly better (95%, sensitivity 95%, specificity 93%) than that of the N2 sleep phase (87%, sensitivity 78%, specificity 96%). SIGNIFICANCE: Automated, unsupervised, and robust classification of behavioral states based on iEEG data is possible, and it is feasible to incorporate these algorithms into future implantable devices with limited computational power, memory, and number of electrodes for brain monitoring and stimulation.
Authors: Krishnakant V Saboo; Irena Balzekas; Vaclav Kremen; Yogatheesan Varatharajah; Michal Kucewicz; Ravishankar K Iyer; Gregory A Worrell Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2021-09-18 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Filip Mivalt; Vaclav Kremen; Vladimir Sladky; Irena Balzekas; Petr Nejedly; Nicholas M Gregg; Brian Nils Lundstrom; Kamila Lepkova; Tereza Pridalova; Benjamin H Brinkmann; Pavel Jurak; Jamie J Van Gompel; Kai Miller; Timothy Denison; Erik K St Louis; Gregory A Worrell Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2022-02-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Irena Balzekas; Vladimir Sladky; Petr Nejedly; Benjamin H Brinkmann; Daniel Crepeau; Filip Mivalt; Nicholas M Gregg; Tal Pal Attia; Victoria S Marks; Lydia Wheeler; Tori E Riccelli; Jeffrey P Staab; Brian Nils Lundstrom; Kai J Miller; Jamie Van Gompel; Vaclav Kremen; Paul E Croarkin; Gregory A Worrell Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2021-07-26 Impact factor: 3.473
Authors: Matthew I Banks; Bryan M Krause; Christopher M Endemann; Declan I Campbell; Christopher K Kovach; Mark Eric Dyken; Hiroto Kawasaki; Kirill V Nourski Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2020-02-08 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Daniel E Payne; Katrina L Dell; Phillipa J Karoly; Vaclav Kremen; Vaclav Gerla; Levin Kuhlmann; Gregory A Worrell; Mark J Cook; David B Grayden; Dean R Freestone Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2020-12-30 Impact factor: 6.740
Authors: Katrina L Dell; Daniel E Payne; Vaclav Kremen; Matias I Maturana; Vaclav Gerla; Petr Nejedly; Gregory A Worrell; Lhotska Lenka; Filip Mivalt; Raymond C Boston; Benjamin H Brinkmann; Wendyl D'Souza; Anthony N Burkitt; David B Grayden; Levin Kuhlmann; Dean R Freestone; Mark J Cook Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2021-06-05
Authors: Nykan Mirchi; Nebras M Warsi; Frederick Zhang; Simeon M Wong; Hrishikesh Suresh; Karim Mithani; Lauren Erdman; George M Ibrahim Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 3.473