| Literature DB >> 30276525 |
R Jansen1, B R van Klarenbosch1, M J Cramer1, R C A Meijer2, P H M Westendorp3, H W J Meijburg4, J J J Bucx5, S A J Chamuleau6, J Kluin7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In patients with mild to moderate functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and absence of right ventricular dysfunction or tricuspid annulus (TA) dilatation, there is currently no indication for concomitant tricuspid valve (TV) repair during elective mitral valve (MV) surgery. However, long-term results are conflicting. Here, we sought to determine the clinical outcome of this cohort, the rate of TR progression after MV surgery and the role of MV aetiology.Entities:
Keywords: Functional tricuspid regurgitation; Mitral valve aetiology; Mitral valve surgery; Tricuspid valve repair
Year: 2018 PMID: 30276525 PMCID: PMC6220025 DOI: 10.1007/s12471-018-1159-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neth Heart J ISSN: 1568-5888 Impact factor: 2.380
Fig. 1Study flowchart (MV mitral valve, UMC University Medical Center, TV tricuspid valve, CABG coronary artery bypass grafting, TR tricuspid regurgitation, TTE transthoracic echocardiography, * excluding concomitant TV repair)
Baseline characteristics and procedure details (n = 204)
|
| |
| Age (years) | 61.1 ± 13.1 |
| Male gender | 125 (61.3) |
| BSA (m2) | 2.2 ± 0.2 |
| NYHA class ≥III | 92 (45.1) |
| EuroSCORE II | 1.4 [0.8–3.5] |
| Hypertension | 63 (30.9) |
| Known coronary artery disease ( | 84 (40.9) |
| Diabetes | 23 (11.3) |
| COPD | 18 (8.8) |
| Renal failure | 38 (18.6) |
| Atrial fibrillation | 38 (18.6) |
| Pacemaker or ICD | 8 (3.9) |
|
| |
| Organic MV disease | 142 (69.6) |
| – Myxomatous degeneration | 79 (38.7) |
| – Fibroelastic degeneration | 47 (23.0) |
| – Rheumatic disease | 13 (6.4) |
| – Other | 3 (1.5) |
| Functional MV disease | 62 (30.4) |
| – Ischaemic cardiomyopathy | 46 (22.5) |
| – Other | 16 (7.8) |
| Preoperative MR ( | |
| >Moderate | 164 (80.2) |
| Preoperative TR | |
| – No | 29 (14.2) |
| – Trace or mild | 126 (61.8) |
| – Moderate | 49 (24.0) |
| >Moderate | 0 (0.0) |
| Preoperative TA ≥ 40 mm ( | 14 (8.5) |
| Preoperative TA diameter (mm) ( | 33 ± 4 |
| MV replacement | 28 (13.7) |
| – Mechanical | 17 (8.3) |
| – Bioprosthesis | 11 (5.4) |
| MV repair | 176 (86.3) |
| – Physio ring | 137 (67.2) |
| – Cosgrove band | 38 (18.6) |
| Elevated RVSP ( | 51 (43.2) |
| Concomitant CABG | 75 (36.8) |
| Cross-clamp time (minutes) | 118 [92–149] |
Data are depicted as n (%), mean ± SD or median [interquartile range]
BSA body surface area, NYHA New York Heart Association, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ICD implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, MV mitral valve, MR mitral regurgitation, TR tricuspid regurgitation, TA tricuspid annulus, RVSP right ventricular systolic pressure, CABG coronary artery bypass crafting
Clinical results at follow-up and echocardiographic characteristic at most recent follow-up
|
| |
|
| |
| Operative mortality | 0 (0.0) |
| 30 days mortality | 5 (2.5) |
| New permanent pacemaker or ICD | 5 (2.5) |
| Atrial fibrillation | 104 (51) |
| Reoperation | 19 (9.3) |
| – due to bleeding | 16 (7.8) |
| – other | 3 (1.5) |
|
| |
| Postoperative (for most recent FU analysis) (years) | 3.4 [1.8–5.2] |
| Postoperative (for survival analysis) (years) | 5.5 [3.7–8.1] |
| Mortality | 26 (12.7) |
| – Cardiovascular | 20 (9.8) |
| – Other | 6 (2.9) |
| NYHA class ≥III ( | 12 (6.5) |
| New reoperation ( | 7 (3.8) |
| – Due to mitral stenosis post MV surgery | 1 (0.5) |
| – Due to endocarditis | 2 (1.0) |
| – Due to bleeding | 1 (0.5) |
| Rehospitalisation ( | 66 (35.3) |
| – Cardiovascular | 46 (22.5) |
| Congestive heart failure ( | 19 (10.4) |
| New permanent pacemaker or ICD ( | 14 (7.6) |
| Atrial fibrillation ( | 38 (20.8) |
| OAC ( | 78 (43.3) |
| Stroke ( | 2 (1.0) |
|
| |
| Time after surgery, years ( | 3.1 [1.6–4.6] |
| LV function, | |
| – Poor (EF < 30%) or moderate (EF 30–44%) | 33 (20.6) |
| LV EF, % ± SD ( | 55 ± 15 |
| LA dilatation, | |
| – Moderate or severe | 34 (25.2) |
| RA dilatation, | |
| – Moderate or severe | 11 (7.1) |
| RV function, | |
| – Poor or moderate | 11 (7.5) |
| TAPSE, cm ± SD ( | 1.8 ± 0.5 |
| MR grade, | |
| >Moderate | 3 (1.9) |
| TR grade, | |
| – No | 24 (14.9) |
| – Trace or mild | 107 (66.5) |
| – Moderate | 28 (17.4) |
| >Moderate | 2 (1.2) |
| TA ≥ 40 mm, | 23 (14.9) |
| – Of whom had pre-operative TA ≥ 40 mm | 3 (13.0) |
| Elevated RVSP, | 14 (14.4) |
Data are depicted as n (%), mean ± SD or median [interquartile range]
ICD implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, NYHA New York Heart Association, MR mitral regurgitation, OAC oral anticoagulation, LV left ventricular, EF ejection fraction, LA left atrial, RA right atrial, TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, TR tricuspid regurgitation, TA tricuspid annulus, RVSP right ventricular systolic pressure.
Fig. 2Kaplan-Meier to illustrate survival according to grade of tricuspid regurgitation at 1 year postoperatively (p = 0.972). Number at risk and number of events are depicted
Fig. 3Grade of tricuspid regurgitation (a), and change in severity per grade at baseline (b) in patients with known tricuspid regurgitation severity at both baseline and most recent follow-up echocardiogram (n = 161, TR tricuspid regurgitation). a Median (IQR) tricuspid regurgitation grade at baseline: 1.0 (1.0–2.0), and most recent follow-up: 1.0 (1.0–1.0), p = 0.166. b Median (IQR) change in patients with no tricuspid regurgitation at baseline: 1.0 (1.0–1.0), mild or trace tricuspid regurgitation at baseline: 0.0 (0.0–0.0), and moderate tricuspid regurgitation at baseline: −1.0 (−1.0– −1.0), p < 0.0001
Echocardiographic results in patients with organic and functional mitral valve disease
| Organic ( | Functional ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| LV function ( | |||
| – Poor (EF < 30%) or moderate (EF 30–44%) | 4 (2.8) | 25 (41.0) | <0.0001 |
| LA dilatation ( | |||
| – Moderate or severe | 75 (57.3) | 27 (49.1) | 0.060 |
| RA dilatation ( | |||
| – Moderate or severe | 14 (10.6) | 6 (11.1) | 0.940 |
| RV function ( | |||
| – Poor or moderate | 1 (0.8) | 3 (5.5) | 0.003 |
| TAPSE (cm) ( | 2.3 [2.1–2.8] | 2.0 [1.8–2.5] | 0.001 |
| MR grade ( | |||
| >Moderate | 122 (86.5) | 42 (67.7) | <0.0001 |
| TR grade ( | 0.892 | ||
| – No | 21 (14.8) | 8 (12.9) | |
| – Trace or mild | 88 (62.0) | 38 (61.3) | |
| – Moderate | 33 (23.2) | 16 (25.8) | |
| >Moderate | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| TA ≥ 40 mm ( | 8 (7.0) | 6 (12.0) | 0.285 |
| TA diameter (mm) ( | 33 ± 4 | 33 ± 5 | 0.994 |
|
| |||
| LV function ( | |||
| – Poor (EF < 30%) or moderate (EF 30–44%) | 10 (8.3) | 23 (50.0) | <0.0001 |
| LA dilatation ( | |||
| – Moderate or severe | 23 (24.5) | 11 (26.8) | 0.181 |
| RA dilatation ( | |||
| – moderate or severe | 7 (6.4) | 4 (8.7) | 0.596 |
| RV function ( | |||
| – Poor or moderate | 3 (2.9) | 8 (19.0) | 0.002 |
| TAPSE (cm) ( | 1.9 [1.6–2.1] | 1.6 [1.4–2.1] | 0.021 |
| MR grade ( | |||
| >Moderate | 2 (1.8) | 1 (2.2) | 0.218 |
| TR grade ( | 0.754 | ||
| – No | 16 (13.9) | 8 (17.4) | |
| – Trace or mild | 79 (68. 8) | 28 (60.9) | |
| – Moderate | 19 (16.5) | 9 (19.6) | |
| >Moderate | 1 (0.9) | 1 (2.2) | |
| TA ≥ 40 mm ( | 18 (16.2) | 5 (11.6) | 0.617 |
| TA diameter (mm) ( | 34 ± 5 | 34 ± 5 | 0.869 |
| Change in TR grade ( | 0.569 | ||
| −2 | 4 (3.5) | 2 (4.3) | |
| −1 | 23 (20.0) | 14 (30.4) | |
| 0 | 66 (57.4) | 20 (43.5) | |
| 1 | 20 (17.4) | 9 (19.6) | |
| 2 | 2 (1.7) | 1 (2.2) | |
Data are depicted as n (%), mean ± SD or median [interquartile range]
EF ejection fraction, LV left ventricular, LA left atrial, RA right atrial, RV right ventricular, TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, MR mitral regurgitation, TR tricuspid regurgitation, TA tricuspid annulus, RVSP right ventricular systolic pressure.
Fig. 4Change in grade of tricuspid regurgitation per mitral valve aetiology subcategory (Median (IQR) change in myxomatous degeneration: 0.0 (−0.8–0.0), fibroelastic degeneration: 0.0 (0.0–0.0), rheumatic disease: 0.0 (−1.0–0.0), organic other cause: 0.0 (−1.0–NA), functional ischaemic cardiomyopathy: 0.0 (−1.0–1.0), functional other cause: 0.0 (−0.3–0.0), p = 0.575)