Vinay Badhwar1, J Scott Rankin2, Max He3, Jeffrey P Jacobs4, Anthony P Furnary5, Frank L Fazzalari6, Sean O'Brien3, James S Gammie7, David M Shahian8. 1. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia. Electronic address: vinay.badhwar@wvumedicine.org. 2. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia. 3. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina. 4. Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Johns Hopkins All Children's Heart Institute, All Children's Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, St. Petersburg, Florida, and Baltimore, Maryland. 5. Starr-Wood Cardiac Group, Portland, Oregon. 6. Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 7. Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland. 8. Department of Surgery and Center for Quality and Safety, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The performance of concomitant tricuspid valve repair (TVr) at the time of mitral valve repair or replacement (MVRR) has previously been associated with elevated short-term risk. Outcomes were assessed at incremental grades of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) to quantify the contemporary risk of concomitant TVr. METHODS: Between July 2011 and June 2014, 88,473 patients undergoing MVRR were examined using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Outcomes with or without TVr, after isolated MVRR (n = 62,118) and MVRR with coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG [n = 26,355]), were independently analyzed at three levels of TR: none-mild, moderate, and severe. Risk-adjusted morbidity and mortality associated with the performance of concomitant TVr were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The TR was graded as none-mild in 74.3% of patients (65,769 of 88,473), moderate in 17.2% (15,222 of 88,473), and severe in 8.5% (7,482 of 88,473). The rate of TVr by TR grade was 3.5% (2,308 of 65,769) for none-mild, 30.6% (4,661 of 15,222) for moderate, and 75.6% (5,654 of 7,482) for severe. Overall risk-adjusted occurrence of any morbidity associated with performance of TVr was increased in both groups (MVRR odds ratio [OR] 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24 to 1.48; and MVRR plus CABG OR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.19 to 1.49). However, at all grades of TR, TVr was not associated with increased risk-adjusted mortality (MVRR OR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.17; and MVRR plus CABG OR 1.04, 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.27). CONCLUSIONS: In contemporary patients, concomitant TVr is not associated with a risk-adjusted increase in mortality, regardless of TR severity. A more liberal approach to TVr at the time of MVRR may be justified when long-term benefits are thought to outweigh incremental short-term morbidity risk. Further investigation of longitudinal TVr outcomes is warranted.
BACKGROUND: The performance of concomitant tricuspid valve repair (TVr) at the time of mitral valve repair or replacement (MVRR) has previously been associated with elevated short-term risk. Outcomes were assessed at incremental grades of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) to quantify the contemporary risk of concomitant TVr. METHODS: Between July 2011 and June 2014, 88,473 patients undergoing MVRR were examined using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Outcomes with or without TVr, after isolated MVRR (n = 62,118) and MVRR with coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG [n = 26,355]), were independently analyzed at three levels of TR: none-mild, moderate, and severe. Risk-adjusted morbidity and mortality associated with the performance of concomitant TVr were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The TR was graded as none-mild in 74.3% of patients (65,769 of 88,473), moderate in 17.2% (15,222 of 88,473), and severe in 8.5% (7,482 of 88,473). The rate of TVr by TR grade was 3.5% (2,308 of 65,769) for none-mild, 30.6% (4,661 of 15,222) for moderate, and 75.6% (5,654 of 7,482) for severe. Overall risk-adjusted occurrence of any morbidity associated with performance of TVr was increased in both groups (MVRR odds ratio [OR] 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24 to 1.48; and MVRR plus CABG OR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.19 to 1.49). However, at all grades of TR, TVr was not associated with increased risk-adjusted mortality (MVRR OR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.17; and MVRR plus CABG OR 1.04, 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.27). CONCLUSIONS: In contemporary patients, concomitant TVr is not associated with a risk-adjusted increase in mortality, regardless of TR severity. A more liberal approach to TVr at the time of MVRR may be justified when long-term benefits are thought to outweigh incremental short-term morbidity risk. Further investigation of longitudinal TVr outcomes is warranted.
Authors: James S Gammie; Michael W A Chu; Volkmar Falk; Jessica R Overbey; Alan J Moskowitz; Marc Gillinov; Michael J Mack; Pierre Voisine; Markus Krane; Babatunde Yerokun; Michael E Bowdish; Lenard Conradi; Steven F Bolling; Marissa A Miller; Wendy C Taddei-Peters; Neal O Jeffries; Michael K Parides; Richard Weisel; Mariell Jessup; Eric A Rose; John C Mullen; Samantha Raymond; Ellen G Moquete; Karen O'Sullivan; Mary E Marks; Alexander Iribarne; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Michael A Borger; Arnar Geirsson; Emilia Bagiella; Judy Hung; Annetine C Gelijns; Patrick T O'Gara; Gorav Ailawadi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2021-11-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jae Woong Choi; Kyung Hwan Kim; Su Chan Lim; Sue Hyun Kim; Suk Ho Sohn; Yeiwon Lee; Ho Young Hwang Journal: Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2020-12-05
Authors: Alexander A Brescia; Sarah T Ward; Tessa M F Watt; Liza M Rosenbloom; Megan Baker; Shazli Khan; Emilie Ziese; Matthew A Romano; Steven F Bolling Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2019-08-31 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: R Jansen; B R van Klarenbosch; M J Cramer; R C A Meijer; P H M Westendorp; H W J Meijburg; J J J Bucx; S A J Chamuleau; J Kluin Journal: Neth Heart J Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 2.380