Silvia Tommasin1, Laura De Giglio1,2, Serena Ruggieri1, Nikolaos Petsas3, Costanza Giannì1, Carlo Pozzilli1,2, Patrizia Pantano4,5. 1. Department of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale dell'Università, 30, 00185, Rome, Italy. 2. Sant'Andrea Hospital, MS Centre, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy. 3. IRCCS Neuromed, Via Atinense, 18, 86077, Pozzilli, IS, Italy. 4. Department of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale dell'Università, 30, 00185, Rome, Italy. patrizia.pantano@uniroma1.it. 5. IRCCS Neuromed, Via Atinense, 18, 86077, Pozzilli, IS, Italy. patrizia.pantano@uniroma1.it.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the relation between brain functional connectivity and disability in patients with multiple sclerosis; to investigate the existence of critical values of both disability and functional connectivity corresponding to exhaustion of functional adaptive mechanisms. METHODS: Hundred-and-nineteen patients with no-to-severe disability and 42 healthy subjects were studied via 3T resting state functional MRI. Out of 116 regions extracted from Automated Anatomical Labeling atlas, pairs of regions whose functional connectivity correlated with Expanded Disability Status Score were identified. In patients, mathematical modeling was applied to find the best models describing Expanded-Disability-Status-Score vs structural or functional measures. Functional vs structural models intersecting points were identified. RESULTS: Disability had direct linear relation with lesion load (r = 0.40, p < 5E-6), inverse of thalamic volume (r = 0.31 p < 1E-3) and functional connectivity in bi-frontal pairs of regions (r > 0.40, p < 0.04), while being non-linearly associated with functional connectivity in cerebello-temporal and cerebello-frontal pairs of regions (F > 1.73, p < 0.02). Structural vs functional models intersecting points corresponded to Expanded Disability Status Score of 3.0. 85% of patients scoring more than 3.0 showed functional connectivity in cerebello-temporal and cerebello-frontal pairs of regions below confidence intervals (z = [2.28-2.88] 95% CI) measured in healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Functional brain connectivity changes may represent mechanisms of adaptation to structural damage and inflammation and may be not always clinically beneficial. Functional connectivity decreases in comparison with structural measure at Expanded Disability Status Score greater than 3.0, which may be critical and indicate exhaustion of compensatory mechanisms.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the relation between brain functional connectivity and disability in patients with multiple sclerosis; to investigate the existence of critical values of both disability and functional connectivity corresponding to exhaustion of functional adaptive mechanisms. METHODS: Hundred-and-nineteen patients with no-to-severe disability and 42 healthy subjects were studied via 3T resting state functional MRI. Out of 116 regions extracted from Automated Anatomical Labeling atlas, pairs of regions whose functional connectivity correlated with Expanded Disability Status Score were identified. In patients, mathematical modeling was applied to find the best models describing Expanded-Disability-Status-Score vs structural or functional measures. Functional vs structural models intersecting points were identified. RESULTS:Disability had direct linear relation with lesion load (r = 0.40, p < 5E-6), inverse of thalamic volume (r = 0.31 p < 1E-3) and functional connectivity in bi-frontal pairs of regions (r > 0.40, p < 0.04), while being non-linearly associated with functional connectivity in cerebello-temporal and cerebello-frontal pairs of regions (F > 1.73, p < 0.02). Structural vs functional models intersecting points corresponded to Expanded Disability Status Score of 3.0. 85% of patients scoring more than 3.0 showed functional connectivity in cerebello-temporal and cerebello-frontal pairs of regions below confidence intervals (z = [2.28-2.88] 95% CI) measured in healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Functional brain connectivity changes may represent mechanisms of adaptation to structural damage and inflammation and may be not always clinically beneficial. Functional connectivity decreases in comparison with structural measure at Expanded Disability Status Score greater than 3.0, which may be critical and indicate exhaustion of compensatory mechanisms.
Authors: Tomas Uher; Manuela Vaneckova; Lukas Sobisek; Michaela Tyblova; Zdenek Seidl; Jan Krasensky; Deepa Ramasamy; Robert Zivadinov; Eva Havrdova; Tomas Kalincik; Dana Horakova Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Sven Jaeger; Friedemann Paul; Michael Scheel; Alexander Brandt; Josephine Heine; Daniel Pach; Claudia M Witt; Judith Bellmann-Strobl; Carsten Finke Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Declan T Chard; Adnan A S Alahmadi; Bertrand Audoin; Thalis Charalambous; Christian Enzinger; Hanneke E Hulst; Maria A Rocca; Àlex Rovira; Jaume Sastre-Garriga; Menno M Schoonheim; Betty Tijms; Carmen Tur; Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott; Alle Meije Wink; Olga Ciccarelli; Frederik Barkhof Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Anna J E Combes; Kristin P O'Grady; Baxter P Rogers; Kurt G Schilling; Richard D Lawless; Mereze Visagie; Delaney Houston; Logan Prock; Shekinah Malone; Sanjana Satish; Atlee A Witt; Colin D McKnight; Francesca Bagnato; John C Gore; Seth A Smith Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2022-07-27 Impact factor: 4.891