Literature DB >> 34145453

Brain Knows Who Is on the Same Wavelength: Resting-State Connectivity Can Predict Compatibility of a Female-Male Relationship.

Shogo Kajimura1, Ayahito Ito2,3,4, Keise Izuma2,3,5.   

Abstract

Prediction of the initial compatibility of heterosexual individuals based on self-reported traits and preferences has not been successful, even with significantly developed information technology. To overcome the limitations of self-reported measures and predict compatibility, we used functional connectivity profiles from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data that carry rich individual-specific information sufficient to predict psychological constructs and activation patterns during social cognitive tasks. Several days after collecting data from resting-state fMRIs, participants undertook a speed-dating experiment in which they had a 3-min speed date with every other opposite-sex participant. Our machine learning algorithm successfully predicted whether pairs in the experiment were compatible or not using (dis)similarity of functional connectivity profiles obtained before the experiment. The similarity and dissimilarity of functional connectivity between individuals and these multivariate relationships contributed to the prediction, hence suggesting the importance of complementarity (observed as dissimilarity) as well as the similarity between an individual and a potential partner during the initial attraction phase. The result indicates that the salience network, limbic areas, and cerebellum are especially important for the feeling of compatibility. This research emphasizes the utility of neural information to predict complex phenomena in a social environment that behavioral measures alone cannot predict.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  functional connectivity; machine learning; resting-state fMRI; romantic relationship; speed-dating

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34145453      PMCID: PMC8491675          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhab143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   4.861


  61 in total

1.  Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain.

Authors:  N Tzourio-Mazoyer; B Landeau; D Papathanassiou; F Crivello; O Etard; N Delcroix; B Mazoyer; M Joliot
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Salience processing and insular cortical function and dysfunction.

Authors:  Lucina Q Uddin
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Predicting personality from network-based resting-state functional connectivity.

Authors:  Alessandra D Nostro; Veronika I Müller; Deepthi P Varikuti; Rachel N Pläschke; Felix Hoffstaedter; Robert Langner; Kaustubh R Patil; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.270

4.  Functional network organization of the human brain.

Authors:  Jonathan D Power; Alexander L Cohen; Steven M Nelson; Gagan S Wig; Kelly Anne Barnes; Jessica A Church; Alecia C Vogel; Timothy O Laumann; Fran M Miezin; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Is Romantic Desire Predictable? Machine Learning Applied to Initial Romantic Attraction.

Authors:  Samantha Joel; Paul W Eastwick; Eli J Finkel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30

6.  Attachment style, gender, and relationship stability: a longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  L A Kirkpatrick; K E Davis
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1994-03

7.  Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex mediates rapid evaluations predicting the outcome of romantic interactions.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Cooper; Simon Dunne; Teresa Furey; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Frequency-specific network topologies in the resting human brain.

Authors:  Shuntaro Sasai; Fumitaka Homae; Hama Watanabe; Akihiro T Sasaki; Hiroki C Tanabe; Norihiro Sadato; Gentaro Taga
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Personality and complex brain networks: The role of openness to experience in default network efficiency.

Authors:  Roger E Beaty; Scott Barry Kaufman; Mathias Benedek; Rex E Jung; Yoed N Kenett; Emanuel Jauk; Aljoscha C Neubauer; Paul J Silvia
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 10.  Hyperscanning: A Valid Method to Study Neural Inter-brain Underpinnings of Social Interaction.

Authors:  Artur Czeszumski; Sara Eustergerling; Anne Lang; David Menrath; Michael Gerstenberger; Susanne Schuberth; Felix Schreiber; Zadkiel Zuluaga Rendon; Peter König
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Neural Processing of Facial Attractiveness and Romantic Love: An Overview and Suggestions for Future Empirical Studies.

Authors:  Ryuhei Ueda
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-14

2.  The Brain Understands Social Relationships: The Emerging Field of Functional-Connectome-Based Interpersonal Research.

Authors:  Shogo Kajimura; Ayahito Ito
Journal:  Neurosci Insights       Date:  2022-08-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.