Literature DB >> 30276437

High patient satisfaction with significant improvement in knee function and pain relief after mid-term follow-up in patients with isolated patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty.

Andreas B Imhoff1, Matthias J Feucht2, Eva Bartsch2, Matthias Cotic2, Jonas Pogorzelski2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes and survivorship at 2 and 5 years after isolated contemporary patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty.
METHODS: Thirty-four patients were prospectively enrolled in the study and were evaluated preoperatively and at 2 and 5 years postoperatively. Clinical outcomes included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain. Kellgren-Lawrence grading was used to assess the progression of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis and the Caton-Deschamps Index to determine patellar height. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to investigate the implant survivorship. Preoperative patient characteristics were compared among failures and success to determine potential risk factors and patient satisfaction was rated postoperatively.
RESULTS: Five of the 34 patients were lost to follow-up resulting in a final follow-up rate of 86%. The total WOMAC subscores of pain and function and the VAS Pain improved significantly at 2- and 5-years, with no significant difference between the two time points. The WOMAC stiffness subscale reached significant improvement at 2-year follow-up alone. No significant progressions of tibiofemoral arthritis or changes in patellar height were observed. A total of six patients (17.1%) failed leaving a survival rate of 91% after 2 years and 83% after 5 years. The main cause for postoperative failure was persistent knee pain; however, no significant preoperative risk factor in patient characteristics could be identified.
CONCLUSION: Patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty shows high patient satisfaction with significant improvement in knee function and pain relief after mid-term follow-up with no radiographic progression of tibiofemoral OA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective case series, Level III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inlay; Knee; Patellofemoral; Patellofemoral arthroplasty; Patellofemoral osteoarthritis; Patellofemoral resurfacing; Retropatellar resurfacing; Trochlea; WAVE prosthesis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30276437     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5173-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Patellofemoral inlay implants-an innovation in patellofemoral joint arthroplasty?]

Authors:  Hannes Degenhardt; Andreas B Imhoff; Matthias J Feucht; Jonas Pogorzelski
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Early outcomes of an anatomic trochlear-cutting patellofemoral arthroplasty: patient selection is key.

Authors:  David Dejour; Mo Saffarini; Yves Malemo; Marco Pungitore; Jeremy Valluy; Luca Nover; Guillaume Demey
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  The Present Situation of Patellofemoral Arthroplasty in the Management of Solitary Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2020-05

4.  Reliable improvements in participation in low-impact sports following implantation of a patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty at mid-term follow-up.

Authors:  Jonas Pogorzelski; Marco-Christopher Rupp; Conrad Ketzer; Matthias Cotic; Patricia Lutz; Saskia Beeck; Andreas B Imhoff; Matthias J Feucht
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Preoperative patellofemoral anatomy affects failure rate after isolated patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthias J Feucht; Patricia M Lutz; Conrad Ketzer; Marco C Rupp; Matthias Cotic; Andreas B Imhoff; Jonas Pogorzelski
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  The lack of retropatellar resurfacing at index surgery is significantly associated with failure in patients following patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty: a multi-center study of more than 260 patients.

Authors:  Andreas B Imhoff; Eva Bartsch; Christoph Becher; Peter Behrens; Gerrit Bode; Matthias Cotic; Theresa Diermeier; Holger Falk; Matthias J Feucht; Ulrich Haupt; Stefan Hinterwimmer; Johannes Holz; René Hutter; René Kaiser; Tobias Knoblauch; Wolfgang Nebelung; Philipp Niemeyer; Turlough O'Donnel; Geert Pagenstert; Thilo Patzer; Tim Rose; Marco C Rupp; Thomas Tischer; Arne J Venjakob; Stephan Vogt; Jonas Pogorzelski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Contemporary knee arthroplasty: one fits all or time for diversity?

Authors:  Johannes Beckmann; Malin Kristin Meier; Christian Benignus; Andreas Hecker; Emmanuel Thienpont
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.067

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.