Literature DB >> 30276093

T1 Slope Minus Cervical Lordosis (TS-CL), the Cervical Answer to PI-LL, Defines Cervical Sagittal Deformity in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Osteotomy.

Themistocles Protopsaltis1, Jamie Terran1, Alex Soroceanu2, Michael J Moses1, Nicolas Bronsard3, Justin Smith4, Eric Klineberg5, Gregory Mundis6, Han Jo Kim7, Richard Hostin8, Robert Hart9, Christopher Shaffrey4, Shay Bess10, Christopher Ames11, Frank Schwab7, Virginie Lafage7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical kyphosis and C2-C7 plumb line (CPL) are established descriptors of cervical sagittal deformity (CSD). Reciprocal changes in these parameters have been demonstrated in thoracolumbar deformity correction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the development of CSD, using T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (TS-CL) to define CSD and to correlate TS-CL and a novel global sagittal parameter, cervical-thoracic pelvic angle (CTPA), with CPL.
METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients with thoracolumbar deformity undergoing three-column osteotomy was performed. Preoperative and postoperative cervical parameters were investigated. Linear regression for postoperative values resulted in a CPL of 4 cm corresponding to a TS-CL threshold of 17°. Patients were classified based on postoperative TS-CL into uncompensated (TS-CL > 17°) or compensated cohorts (TS-CL < 17°); the two were compared using an unpaired t test. Logistic regression modeling was used to determine predictors of postoperative CSD.
RESULTS: A total of 223 patients with thoracolumbar deformity (mean age, 57.56 years) were identified. CTPA correlated with CPL (preoperative r = .85, postoperative r = .69). TS-CL correlated with CTPA (preoperative r = .52, postoperative r = .37) and CPL (preoperative r = .52; postoperative r = .37). CSD had greater preoperative CPL (P < .001) and CTPA (P < .001). The compensated cohort had a decrease in TS-CL (from 10.2 to 8.0) with sagittal vertical axis (SVA) correction, whereas the uncompensated had an increase in TS-CL (from 22.3 to 26.8) with all P < .001. Reciprocal change was demonstrated in the compensated group given that CL decreased with SVA correction (r = .39), but there was no such correlation in the uncompensated. Positive predictors of postoperative CSD included baseline TS-CL > 17° (P = .007), longer fusion (P = .033), and baseline CTPA (P = .029).
CONCLUSIONS: TS-CL and CTPA correlated significantly with established sagittal balance measures. Whereas reciprocal change in cervical and thoracolumbar alignment was demonstrated in the compensated cohort, the uncompensated population had progression of their cervical deformities after three-column osteotomy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The balance between TS-CL mirrors the relationship between pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis in defining deformities of their respective spinal regions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CPL; TS-CL; alignment; cervical kyphosis; thoracolumbar deformity

Year:  2018        PMID: 30276093      PMCID: PMC6159736          DOI: 10.14444/5042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  26 in total

1.  Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters.

Authors:  Eric Berthonnaud; Joannès Dimnet; Pierre Roussouly; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-02

Review 2.  Neutral upright sagittal spinal alignment from the occiput to the pelvis in asymptomatic adults: a review and resynthesis of the literature.

Authors:  Charles Kuntz; Linda S Levin; Stephen L Ondra; Christopher I Shaffrey; Chad J Morgan
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-02

Review 3.  Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient.

Authors:  Frank Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Ashish Patel; Jean-Pierre Farcy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study evaluating the correlation of clinical outcomes and cervical sagittal alignment.

Authors:  Alan T Villavicencio; Jason M Babuska; Alex Ashton; Eric Busch; Cassandra Roeca; E Lee Nelson; Alexander Mason; Sigita Burneikiene
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine in asymptomatic people.

Authors:  D R Gore; S B Sepic; G M Gardner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The effect of age on cervical sagittal alignment: normative data on 100 asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Moon Soo Park; Seong-Hwan Moon; Hwan-Mo Lee; Seok Woo Kim; Tae-Hwan Kim; Seung Yeop Lee; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications: a review.

Authors:  Justin K Scheer; Jessica A Tang; Justin S Smith; Frank L Acosta; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Benjamin Blondel; Shay Bess; Christopher I Shaffrey; Vedat Deviren; Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-06-14

8.  Spontaneous improvement of cervical alignment after correction of global sagittal balance following pedicle subtraction osteotomy.

Authors:  Justin S Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Virginie Lafage; Benjamin Blondel; Frank Schwab; Richard Hostin; Robert Hart; Brian O'Shaughnessy; Shay Bess; Serena S Hu; Vedat Deviren; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-08-03

9.  Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis.

Authors:  Frank J Schwab; Benjamin Blondel; Shay Bess; Richard Hostin; Christopher I Shaffrey; Justin S Smith; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Douglas C Burton; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Gregory M Mundis; Christopher P Ames; Khaled Kebaish; Robert A Hart; Jean-Pierre Farcy; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Relationship Between T1 Slope and Cervical Alignment Following Multilevel Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery: Impact of T1 Slope Minus Cervical Lordosis.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Hyun; Ki-Jeong Kim; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Hyun-Jib Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  Clinical comparison between simple laminectomy and laminectomy plus posterior instrumentation in surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  G Gargiulo; M Girardo; A Rava; A Coniglio; P Cinnella; A Massè; F Fusini
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-02-08

2.  Cervical deformity patients with baseline hyperlordosis or hyperkyphosis differ in surgical treatment and radiographic outcomes.

Authors:  Peter Gust Passias; Haddy Alas; Nicholas Kummer; Peter Tretiakov; Bassel G Diebo; Renaud Lafage; Christopher P Ames; Breton Line; Eric O Klineberg; Douglas C Burton; Juan S Uribe; Han Jo Kim; Alan H Daniels; Shay Bess; Themistocles Protopsaltis; Gregory M Mundis; Christopher I Shaffrey; Frank J Schwab; Justin S Smith; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2022-09-14

3.  Development of New-Onset Cervical Deformity in Nonoperative Adult Spinal Deformity Patients With 2-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Peter G Passias; Cyrus M Jalai; Nancy Worley; Shaleen Vira; Justin K Scheer; Justin S Smith; Subaraman Ramachandran; Alexandra Soroceanu; Samantha R Horn; Gregory W Poorman; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Eric O Klineberg; Daniel M Sciubba; Han Jo Kim; D Kojo Hamilton; Renaud Lafage; Virginie Lafage; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12-21

4.  Cervical balance and clinical outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and hybrid cervical surgery: A CONSORT-compliant study with minimum follow-up period of 5 years.

Authors:  Fanqi Meng; Shuai Xu; Yan Liang; Zhenqi Zhu; Kaifeng Wang; Haiying Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Cervical deformity patients with baseline hyperlordosis or hyperkyphosis differ in surgical treatment and radiographic outcomes.

Authors:  Haddy Alas; Peter Gust Passias; Bassel G Diebo; Avery E Brown; Katherine E Pierce; Cole Bortz; Renaud Lafage; Christopher P Ames; Breton Line; Eric O Klineberg; Douglas C Burton; Juan S Uribe; Han Jo Kim; Alan H Daniels; Shay Bess; Themistocles Protopsaltis; Gregory M Mundis; Christopher I Shaffrey; Frank J Schwab; Justin S Smith; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2021-09-08

6.  Retrospective Analysis of Sagittal Balance Parameters and Clinical Efficacy After Short-Segment Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery with Different Fusion Devices.

Authors:  Zihan Wei; Ying Zhang; Sizhen Yang; Chenhui Cai; Jiawen Ye; Hao Qiu; Xu Hu; Yiyun Qu; Xuan Wen; Tongwei Chu
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-03-22

7.  Odontoid Incidence: A Novel Cervical Parameter Influencing Cervical Alignment From Top to Bottom.

Authors:  Jae-Koo Lee; Seung-Jae Hyun; Ki-Jeong Kim
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-06-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.