Literature DB >> 23354112

The effect of age on cervical sagittal alignment: normative data on 100 asymptomatic subjects.

Moon Soo Park1, Seong-Hwan Moon, Hwan-Mo Lee, Seok Woo Kim, Tae-Hwan Kim, Seung Yeop Lee, K Daniel Riew.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To determine age-related changes in cervical sagittal alignment using whole-spine standing radiographs in asymptomatic adults. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Modern surgical techniques have emphasized the importance of maintaining proper sagittal alignment. But there is a paucity of literature investigating age-related changes in cervical sagittal alignment.
METHODS: One hundred healthy unoperated adults who were free of spinal problems obtained whole-spine standing radiographs. They consisted of 2 groups divided by age: those in their 20s and those older than 60 years. Each group had an equal ratio of males and females. Distances from C2 as well as C7 plumb lines to the following points were measured: thoracic and lumbar apex as well as the posterior superior corner of the S1 vertebral body. In addition, Cobb angles for C0-C2, C2-C7, thoracic kyphotic angle, lumbar lordotic angle, and T1 sagittal slope angles were measured.
RESULTS: The distance between the C2 and C7 plumb lines did not vary with age. The thoracic apex shifted caudally from T6 in the younger group to T7 in the older group. The most common lumbar apex was L4 for both groups. The distance from C2, as well as C7 plumb lines to the posterior superior corner of the S1 vertebral body, as well as the thoracic apex increased significantly in the older group. On the contrary, the distance from the 2 plumb lines to the lumbar apex decreased in the older group. Also, C2-C7 angle increased and T1 sagittal slope angle decreased in the older group compared with the younger group. However, no difference was found for the other Cobb angles between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSION: The distances between the plumb lines from C2 and C7 were maintained but C2-C7 sagittal angle increased with aging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23354112     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828802c2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  25 in total

1.  Reliability of cervical lordosis measurement techniques on long-cassette radiographs.

Authors:  Piotr Janusz; Marcin Tyrakowski; Hailong Yu; Kris Siemionow
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  How old is your cervical spine? Cervical spine biological age: a new evaluation scale.

Authors:  Venceslao Wierzbicki; Alessandro Pesce; Luigi Marrocco; Emanuele Piccione; Claudio Colonnese; Riccardo Caruso
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Does whole-spine lateral radiograph with clavicle positioning reflect the correct cervical sagittal alignment?

Authors:  Sang-Min Park; Kwang-Sup Song; Seung-Hwan Park; Hyun Kang; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Analysis of cervical and global spine alignment under Roussouly sagittal classification in Chinese cervical spondylotic patients and asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Miao Yu; Wen-Kui Zhao; Mai Li; Shao-Bo Wang; Yu Sun; Liang Jiang; Feng Wei; Xiao-Guang Liu; Lin Zeng; Zhong-Jun Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Influence of cervical spine position on the radiographic parameters of the thoracic inlet alignment.

Authors:  Piotr Janusz; Marcin Tyrakowski; Pawel Glowka; Roosevelt Offoha; Kris Siemionow
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  "Reverse roussouly": cervicothoracic curvature ratios define characteristic shapes in adult cervical deformity.

Authors:  Peter G Passias; Katherine E Pierce; Tyler Williamson; Shaleen Vira; Stephane Owusu-Sarpong; Ravinderjit Singh; Oscar Krol; Lara Passfall; Nicholas Kummer; Bailey Imbo; Rachel Joujon-Roche; Peter Tretiakov; Kevin Moattari; Matthew V Abola; Waleed Ahmad; Sara Naessig; Salman Ahmad; Vivek Singh; Bassel Diebo; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.721

7.  T1 Slope Minus Cervical Lordosis (TS-CL), the Cervical Answer to PI-LL, Defines Cervical Sagittal Deformity in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Osteotomy.

Authors:  Themistocles Protopsaltis; Jamie Terran; Alex Soroceanu; Michael J Moses; Nicolas Bronsard; Justin Smith; Eric Klineberg; Gregory Mundis; Han Jo Kim; Richard Hostin; Robert Hart; Christopher Shaffrey; Shay Bess; Christopher Ames; Frank Schwab; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-15

8.  Prevalence and Factors Affecting Cervical Deformity in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Radiological Study.

Authors:  Xiaobang Hu; Isador H Lieberman
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03-30

9.  The Use of T1 Sagittal Angle in Predicting Cervical Disc Degeneration.

Authors:  Bong-Seok Yang; Su-Keon Lee; Kyung-Sub Song; Sang-Pil Yoon; Geun Jang; Chae-Chul Lee; Seong-Hwan Moon; Hwan-Mo Lee; Seung-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-09-22

Review 10.  The relationship between thoracic kyphosis and age, and normative values across age groups: a systematic review of healthy adults.

Authors:  Mattia Zappalá; Stephen Lightbourne; Nicola R Heneghan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.