Literature DB >> 20407356

Surgeon perceptions and reported complications in spine surgery.

Mark B Dekutoski1, Daniel C Norvell, Joseph R Dettori, Michael G Fehlings, Jens R Chapman.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Systematic review.
OBJECTIVE: To define the term "complications" from the spine surgery literature and contrast this with definitions from other federal institutions, to summarize the incidence of adverse events in cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine surgery, to include the factors that contribute to these events, and to determine the relationship between complications and patient centered outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Efforts to understand and reduce complications in medicine, and spine surgery in particular have been hampered as a result of the lack of a meaningful and universally acceptable definition. The complex field of spine surgery has been a particularly challenging area for the development of a consensus to constructively describe these "undesirable/unanticipated developments arising during or out of the delivery of health care." Furthermore, an overall understanding of expected complication rates after major spine surgery is lacking.
METHODS: A systematic review of the English literature was undertaken for articles published between 1990 and December 2008. Electronic and federal databases and reference lists of key articles were searched to identify articles defining complications and reporting rates of spine surgical complications. Two independent reviewers assessed the level of evidence quality using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria and disagreements were resolved by consensus. RESULTS.: The definitions for complications in the spine literature and federal agencies are inconsistent and at times conflicting. Mortality rates for cervical spine and lumbar spine surgery are <1%. For thoracic spine surgery, rates range from 0.3% to 7%. Complication rates range from 5% to 19%, 7% to 18%, and 4% to 14% after cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine surgery, respectively. Findings from a single study indicate that major complications may have an impact on 1-year self-perceived general health. However, minor complications may not.
CONCLUSION: We define a complication as an unintended and undesirable diagnostic or therapeutic event that may impact the patient's care. Complications should be recorded and analyzed relative to disease severity, patient comorbidities, and ultimately their effect on patient outcomes. Further work needs to be done to develop a complication risk impact index that has the ability to help us assess and communicate the interaction of patient comorbidities and complication severity on patient centered outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20407356     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d830de

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  17 in total

Review 1.  Impact of spine surgery complications on costs associated with management of adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Samrat Yeramaneni; Chessie Robinson; Richard Hostin
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09

Review 2.  Complications of surgical intervention in adult lumbar scoliosis.

Authors:  Peter A Christiansen; Michael LaBagnara; Durga R Sure; Christopher I Shaffrey; Justin S Smith
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09

Review 3.  Current trends in ambulatory spine surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Edward M DelSole; Heeren S Makanji; Mark F Kurd
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

4.  A risk score for predicting hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia in ITP using nationally representative data.

Authors:  Ye-Jun Wu; Ming Hou; Hui-Xin Liu; Jun Peng; Liang-Ming Ma; Lin-Hua Yang; Ru Feng; Hui Liu; Yi Liu; Jia Feng; Hong-Yu Zhang; Ze-Ping Zhou; Wen-Sheng Wang; Xu-Liang Shen; Peng Zhao; Hai-Xia Fu; Qiao-Zhu Zeng; Xing-Lin Wang; Qiu-Sha Huang; Yun He; Qian Jiang; Hao Jiang; Jin Lu; Xiang-Yu Zhao; Xiao-Su Zhao; Ying-Jun Chang; Lan-Ping Xu; Yue-Ying Li; Qian-Fei Wang; Xiao-Hui Zhang
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-11-24

5.  Can Surgeons Adequately Capture Adverse Events Using the Spinal Adverse Events Severity System (SAVES) and OrthoSAVES?

Authors:  Brian P Chen; Katie Garland; Darren M Roffey; Stephane Poitras; Geoffrey Dervin; Peter Lapner; Philippe Phan; Eugene K Wai; Stephen P Kingwell; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Rates of Mortality in Cervical Spine Surgical Procedures and Factors Associated With Its Occurrence Over a 10-Year Period: A Study of 342 477 Patients on the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Gregory Wyatt Poorman; John Y Moon; Samantha R Horn; Cyrus Jalai; Peter L Zhou; Olivia Bono; Peter G Passias
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

7.  Japanese 2011 nationwide survey on complications from spine surgery.

Authors:  Yasuaki Imajo; Toshihiko Taguchi; Kazunori Yone; Atsushi Okawa; Koji Otani; Tadanori Ogata; Hiroshi Ozawa; Yoichi Shimada; Masashi Neo; Tetsuhiro Iguchi
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 1.601

8.  Economics of less invasive spinal surgery: an analysis of hospital cost differences between open and minimally invasive instrumented spinal fusion procedures during the perioperative period.

Authors:  John C Lucio; R Brent Vanconia; Kevin J Deluzio; Jeffrey A Lehmen; Jody A Rodgers; Wb Rodgers
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2012-08-20

9.  "Building a foundation of trust".

Authors:  Jens Chapman
Journal:  Evid Based Spine Care J       Date:  2010-08

10.  Morbidity and mortality conferences: Their educational role and why we should be there.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-11-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.