Purpose: Although health care professional education programmes around the world are increasingly using sophisticated simulation technology, the scope of simulation use in Canadian physiotherapy programmes is currently undefined. The current study explores the definitions of simulation, its current use, and the perceived benefits and barriers in Canadian entry-to-practice physiotherapy programmes. Method: Using a qualitative, descriptive study approach, we contacted Canadian physiotherapy programmes to identify faculty members with simulation experience. Using a semi-structured interview format, we asked participants to discuss their perspectives of simulation in their physiotherapy programmes. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for themes. Results: Of 13 eligible Canadian physiotherapy programmes, participants from 8 were interviewed. The interviews revealed three major themes: (1) variability in the definition of fidelity in simulation, (2) variability in simulation use, and (3) the benefits of and barriers to the use of simulation. Conclusions: Variability in the definition of fidelity in simulation among Canadian physiotherapy programmes is consistent with the current literature, highlighting a spectrum of complexity from low fidelity to high fidelity. Physiotherapy programmes are using a variety of simulations, with the aim of creating a bridge from theoretical knowledge to clinical practice. This study describes the starting point for characterizing simulation implementation in Canadian physiotherapy programmes and reflects the diversity that exists across the country.
Purpose: Although health care professional education programmes around the world are increasingly using sophisticated simulation technology, the scope of simulation use in Canadian physiotherapy programmes is currently undefined. The current study explores the definitions of simulation, its current use, and the perceived benefits and barriers in Canadian entry-to-practice physiotherapy programmes. Method: Using a qualitative, descriptive study approach, we contacted Canadian physiotherapy programmes to identify faculty members with simulation experience. Using a semi-structured interview format, we asked participants to discuss their perspectives of simulation in their physiotherapy programmes. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for themes. Results: Of 13 eligible Canadian physiotherapy programmes, participants from 8 were interviewed. The interviews revealed three major themes: (1) variability in the definition of fidelity in simulation, (2) variability in simulation use, and (3) the benefits of and barriers to the use of simulation. Conclusions: Variability in the definition of fidelity in simulation among Canadian physiotherapy programmes is consistent with the current literature, highlighting a spectrum of complexity from low fidelity to high fidelity. Physiotherapy programmes are using a variety of simulations, with the aim of creating a bridge from theoretical knowledge to clinical practice. This study describes the starting point for characterizing simulation implementation in Canadian physiotherapy programmes and reflects the diversity that exists across the country.
Entities:
Keywords:
education; high fidelity simulation training; patient simulation; qualitative research
Authors: Kathryn Watson; Anthony Wright; Norman Morris; Joan McMeeken; Darren Rivett; Felicity Blackstock; Anne Jones; Terry Haines; Vivienne O'Connor; Geoffrey Watson; Raymond Peterson; Gwendolen Jull Journal: Med Educ Date: 2012-05-30 Impact factor: 6.251
Authors: Marisa Brett-Fleegler; Jenny Rudolph; Walter Eppich; Michael Monuteaux; Eric Fleegler; Adam Cheng; Robert Simon Journal: Simul Healthc Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 1.929
Authors: Felicity C Blackstock; Kathryn M Watson; Norman R Morris; Anne Jones; Anthony Wright; Joan M McMeeken; Darren A Rivett; Vivienne O'Connor; Raymond F Peterson; Terry P Haines; Geoffrey Watson; Gwendolen Anne Jull Journal: Simul Healthc Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 1.929