Literature DB >> 22213493

Distinguishing case series from cohort studies.

Olaf M Dekkers1, Matthias Egger, Douglas G Altman, Jan P Vandenbroucke.   

Abstract

Case series are a commonly reported study design, but the label "case series" is used inconsistently and sometimes incorrectly. Mislabeling impairs the appropriate indexing and sorting of evidence. This article tries to clarify the concept of case series and proposes a way to distinguish them from cohort studies. In a cohort study, patients are sampled on the basis of exposure and are followed over time, and the occurrence of outcomes is assessed. A cohort study may include a comparison group, although this is not a necessary feature. A case series may be a study that samples patients with both a specific outcome and a specific exposure, or one that samples patients with a specific outcome and includes patients regardless of whether they have specific exposures. Whereas a cohort study, in principle, enables the calculation of an absolute risk or a rate for the outcome, such a calculation is not possible in a case series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22213493     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-1-201201030-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  57 in total

1.  Self-Analysis: Do I Comprehend Case Series and Cohort Studies? A Fellow's Perspective.

Authors:  Daniel J McCabe
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2019-05-07

2.  The Embrace of the Proabortion Turnaway Study: Wishful Thinking? or Willful Deceptions?

Authors:  David C Reardon
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2018-06-20

Review 3.  How Does Bony Surgery Affect Results of Anterior Open Reduction in Walking-age Children With Developmental Hip Dysplasia?

Authors:  Alpesh Kothari; George Grammatopoulos; Sally Hopewell; Tim Theologis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Close, but no cigar.

Authors:  M Bishawi; C Foppa; R Bergamaschi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Ommaya reservoir infection rate: a 6-year retrospective cohort study of Ommaya reservoir in pediatrics.

Authors:  Sharafaldeen Bin Nafisah; Maqsood Ahmad
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Case series and descriptive cohort studies in neurosurgery: the confusion and solution.

Authors:  Ignatius N Esene; Julius Ngu; Mohamed El Zoghby; Ihsan Solaroglu; Anna M Sikod; Ali Kotb; Gilbert Dechambenoit; Hossam El Husseiny
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 7.  Fixation of stem in revision of total knee arthroplasty: cemented versus cementless-a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Changyao Wang; Tilman Pfitzner; Philipp von Roth; Hermann O Mayr; Michael Sostheim; Robert Hube
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Clinical results of infrared coagulation as a treatment of high-grade anal dysplasia: a systematic review.

Authors:  J Corral; D Parés; F García-Cuyás; B Revollo; S Videla; A Chamorro; M Piñol; B Clotet; G Sirera
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Methodology guideline for clinical studies investigating traditional Chinese medicine and integrative medicine: executive summary.

Authors:  Jian-Ping Liu; Ke-Ji Chen
Journal:  Complement Ther Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.446

Review 10.  How Well Is Quality Improvement Described in the Perioperative Care Literature? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Emma L Jones; Nicholas Lees; Graham Martin; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2016-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.