| Literature DB >> 30275104 |
Zachary R Stromberg1, Angelica Van Goor1, Graham A J Redweik1, Meghan J Wymore Brand2, Michael J Wannemuehler2, Melha Mellata3.
Abstract
Most Escherichia coli strains in the human intestine are harmless. However, enterohemorrhagic E coli (EHEC) is a foodborne pathogen that causes intestinal disease in humans. Conventionally reared (CONV) mice are inconsistent models for human infections with EHEC because they are often resistant to E coli colonization, in part due to their gastrointestinal (GI) microbiota. Although antibiotic manipulation of the mouse microbiota has been a common means to overcome colonization resistance, these models have limitations. Currently, there are no licensed treatments for clinical EHEC infections and, thus, new tools to study EHEC colonization need to be developed. Here, we used a defined microbiota mouse model, consisting of the altered Schaedler flora (ASF), to characterize intestinal colonization and compare host responses following colonization with EHEC strain 278F2 or non-pathogenic E coli strain MG1655. Significantly higher (P<0.05) levels of both strains were found in feces and cecal and colonic contents of C3H/HeN ASF compared to C3H/HeN CONV mice. GI inflammation was significantly elevated (P<0.05) in the cecum of EHEC 278F2-colonized compared to E. coli MG1655-colonized C3H/HeN ASF mice. In addition, EHEC 278F2 differentially modulated inflammatory-associated genes in colonic tissue of C3H/HeN ASF mice compared to E. coli MG1655-colonized mice. This approach allowed for prolonged colonization of the murine GI tract by pathogenic and non-pathogenic E coli strains, and for evaluation of host inflammatory processes. Overall, this system can be used as a powerful tool for future studies to assess therapeutics, microbe-microbe interactions, and strategies for preventing EHEC infections.Entities:
Keywords: E. coli; Enterohemorrhagic E. coli; Inflammation; Mouse model
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30275104 PMCID: PMC6262807 DOI: 10.1242/dmm.035063
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Model Mech ISSN: 1754-8403 Impact factor: 5.758
Fig. 1.Timeline of experimental procedures. Mice were inoculated with PBS (control) or 108 CFU of enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) 278F2 or non-pathogenic E. coli MG1655. Weekly fecal samples were collected as indicted. The diet was changed to Teklad 2920X for fluorescent imaging and mice harboring the altered Schaedler flora (ASF; n=3 per group) were injected on day 27 post-inoculation with ProSense 680. At necropsy, the gastrointestinal (GI) tract was excised and imaged for mucosal inflammation (ASF mice only), intestinal contents were collected for enumeration of E. coli [ASF and conventionally reared (CONV) mice], and intestinal tissues were harvested (ASF mice only) for histopathology and host transcriptome profiling.
Fig. 2.Ability of Mice were inoculated with 108 CFU of pathogenic enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) strain 278F2 or non-pathogenic strain MG1655. The ability of strains to colonize the gastrointestinal tract was assessed by collecting (A) fecal samples on days 7, 14, 21 and 27 post-inoculation and (B-F) intestinal contents on day 28 post-inoculation. The sample size for each group was as follows: 278F2- or MG1655-inoculated ASF mice (n=13 or 10, respectively) and 278F2- or MG1655-inoculated CONV mice (n=12 or 13, respectively). Data are representative of at least two individual experiments. Each symbol represents an individual animal and bars indicate the mean. Blue and red symbols represent CONV and ASF mice, respectively. Means with the same letter are not significantly different (P>0.05) as determined by an ANOVA followed by Tukey's test for multiple means comparison. The horizontal dashed line is the limit of detection (LOD). Samples that tested negative for E. coli were assigned a value halfway between zero and the LOD.
Histopathological evaluation of ileal and colonic tissue of ASF mice
Fig. 3.Evaluation of mucosal inflammation in mice with a microbiota consisting of the altered Schaedler flora (ASF). Mice received a tail vein injection with 2 nmol per mouse of ProSense 680 and were imaged 18 h later using the In Vivo Multispectral Imaging System FX Pro. (A) The entire GI tract was excised from uninfected (top row), non-pathogenic E. coli MG1655-inoculated (middle row), and enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) 278F2-inoculated (bottom row) mice (n=3 per group). Arrows indicate the cecum. (B) Relative fluorescence was measured in ImageJ. An ANOVA followed by Tukey's method for multiple means comparison was used to compare total corrected cellular fluorescence of intestinal sections. Each symbol represents an individual animal and bars represent mean±s.e.m.
Differentially expressed inflammatory-associated genes in the colon
Fig. 4.Protein-protein interaction network among differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in colon tissue of altered Schaedler flora (ASF) mice. DEGs from the comparisons of (A) uninfected vs MG1655-colonized, (B) uninfected vs 278F2-colonized and (C) MG1655-colonized vs 278F2-colonized ASF mice were used as input for protein-protein interactions. The edges connecting proteins represent the predicted functional associations and are colored based on the type of interaction.