Literature DB >> 30273584

Tackling poorly selected, collected, and reported outcomes in obstetrics and gynecology research.

James M N Duffy1, Sue Ziebland2, Peter von Dadelszen3, Richard J McManus2.   

Abstract

Clinical research should ultimately improve patient care. To enable this, randomized controlled trials must select, collect, and report outcomes that are both relevant to clinical practice and genuinely reflect the perspectives of key stakeholders including health care professionals, researchers, and patients. Unfortunately, many randomized controlled trials fall short of this requirement. Complex issues, including a failure to take into account the perspectives of key stakeholders when selecting outcomes, variations in outcome definitions and measurement instruments, and outcome reporting bias make research evidence difficult to interpret, undermining the translation of research into clinical practice. Problems with poor outcome selection, measurement, and reporting can be addressed by developing, disseminating, and implementing core outcome sets. A core outcome set represents a minimum data set of outcomes developed using robust consensus science methods engaging diverse stakeholders including health care professionals, researchers, and patients. Core outcomes should be routinely utilized by researchers, collected in a standardized manner, and reported consistently in the final publication. They are currently being developed across our specialty including infertility, endometriosis, and preeclampsia. Recognizing poorly selected, collected, and reported outcomes as serious hindrances to progress in our specialty, more than 80 journals including the Journal, have come together to support the Core Outcomes in Women's and Newborn Health (CROWN) initiative. The consortium supports researchers to develop, disseminate, and implement core outcome sets. Implementing core outcome sets could make a profound contribution to addressing poorly selected, collected, and reported outcomes. Implementation should ensure future randomized controlled trials hold the necessary reach and relevance to inform clinical practice, enhance patient care, and improve patient outcomes.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  core outcome sets; gynecology; obstetrics; outcome measures; outcomes; research waste

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30273584     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  10 in total

1.  White Coat Hypertension in Pregnancy: The Challenge of Combining Inconsistent Data.

Authors:  James M Roberts; Malamo Countouris
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis.

Authors:  Celine Bafort; Yusuf Beebeejaun; Carla Tomassetti; Jan Bosteels; James Mn Duffy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-10-23

Review 3.  Challenges in Interpreting Obstetrics and Gynecology Literature.

Authors:  Ann M Bruno; Nathan R Blue
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 1.966

4.  Core outcomes in neonatology: development of a core outcome set for neonatal research.

Authors:  James William Harrison Webbe; James M N Duffy; Elsa Afonso; Iyad Al-Muzaffar; Ginny Brunton; Anne Greenough; Nigel J Hall; Marian Knight; Jos M Latour; Caroline Lee-Davey; Neil Marlow; Laura Noakes; Julie Nycyk; Angela Richard-Löndt; Ben Wills-Eve; Neena Modi; Chris Gale
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  Standardizing definitions and reporting guidelines for the infertility core outcome set: an international consensus development study†  ‡.

Authors:  J M N Duffy; S Bhattacharya; S Bhattacharya; M Bofill; B Collura; C Curtis; J L H Evers; L C Giudice; R G Farquharson; S Franik; M Hickey; M L Hull; V Jordan; Y Khalaf; R S Legro; S Lensen; D Mavrelos; B W Mol; C Niederberger; E H Y Ng; L Puscasiu; S Repping; I Sarris; M Showell; A Strandell; A Vail; M van Wely; M Vercoe; N L Vuong; A Y Wang; R Wang; J Wilkinson; M A Youssef; C M Farquhar; Ahmed M. Abou-Setta; Juan J. Aguilera; Hisham AlAhwany; Oluseyi O. A. Atanda; Eva M. E. Balkenende; Kurt T. Barnhart; Yusuf Beebeejaun; Georgina M. Chambers; Abrar A. Chughtai; Irene Cuevas-Sáiz; Cate Curtis; Arianna D'Angelo; Danielle D. Dubois; Kirsten Duckitt; Carlos Encinas; Marie-Odile Gerval; Nhu H. Giang; Ahmed Gibreel; Lynda J. Gingel; Elizabeth J. Glanville; Demian Glujovsky; Ingrid Granne; Georg Griesinger; Devashana Gupta Repromed; Zeinab Hamzehgardeshi; Martin Hirsch; Marcos Horton; Shikha Jain; Marta Jansa Perez; Claire A. Jones; Mohan S. Kamath; José Knijnenburg; Elena Kostova; Antonio La Marca; Tien Khac Le; Arthur Leader; Brigitte Leeviers; Jian Li Chinese; Olabisi M. Loto; Karen L. Marks; Rodrigo M. Martinez-Vazquez; Alison R. McTavish; David J. Mills; Raju R. Nair; Dung Thi Phuong Nguyen; Anne-Sophie Otter; Allan A. Pacey; Satu Rautakallio-Hokkanen; Lynn C. Sadler; Peggy Sagle; Juan-Enrique Schwarze; Heather M. Shapiro; Joe L. Simpson; Charalampos S. Siristatidis; Akanksha Sood; Catherine Strawbridge; Helen L. Torrance; Cam Tu Tran; Emma L. Votteler; Chi Chiu Wang; Andrew Watson; Menem Yossry
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Developing a core outcome set for future infertility research: an international consensus development study†  ‡.

Authors:  J M N Duffy; H AlAhwany; S Bhattacharya; B Collura; C Curtis; J L H Evers; R G Farquharson; S Franik; L C Giudice; Y Khalaf; J M L Knijnenburg; B Leeners; R S Legro; S Lensen; J C Vazquez-Niebla; D Mavrelos; B W J Mol; C Niederberger; E H Y Ng; A S Otter; L Puscasiu; S Rautakallio-Hokkanen; S Repping; I Sarris; J L Simpson; A Strandell; C Strawbridge; H L Torrance; A Vail; M van Wely; M A Vercoe; N L Vuong; A Y Wang; R Wang; J Wilkinson; M A Youssef; C M Farquhar
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Top 10 priorities for future infertility research: an international consensus development study†  ‡.

Authors:  J M N Duffy; G D Adamson; E Benson; S Bhattacharya; S Bhattacharya; M Bofill; K Brian; B Collura; C Curtis; J L H Evers; R G Farquharson; A Fincham; S Franik; L C Giudice; E Glanville; M Hickey; A W Horne; M L Hull; N P Johnson; V Jordan; Y Khalaf; J M L Knijnenburg; R S Legro; S Lensen; J MacKenzie; D Mavrelos; B W Mol; D E Morbeck; H Nagels; E H Y Ng; C Niederberger; A S Otter; L Puscasiu; S Rautakallio-Hokkanen; L Sadler; I Sarris; M Showell; J Stewart; A Strandell; C Strawbridge; A Vail; M van Wely; M Vercoe; N L Vuong; A Y Wang; R Wang; J Wilkinson; K Wong; T Y Wong; C M Farquhar; Hisham AlAhwany; Ofra Balaban; Faith Barton; Yusuf Beebeejaun; Jacky Boivin; Jan J. A. Bosteels; Carlos Calhaz-Jorge; Arianna D’Angelo; Leona F. Dann; Christopher J. De Jonge; Elyce du Mez; Rui A. Ferriani; Marie-Odile Gerval; Lynda J. Gingel; Ellen M. Greenblatt; Geraldine Hartshorne; Charlie Helliwell; Lynda J. Hughes; Junyoung Jo; Jelena Jovanović; Ludwig Kiesel; Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Elena Kostova; Tansu Kucuk; Rajesh Kumar; Robyn L. Lawrence; Nicole Lee; Katy E. Lindemann; Olabisi M. Loto; Peter J. Lutjen; Michelle MacKinven; Mariano Mascarenhas; Helen McLaughlin; Selma M. Mourad; Linh K. Nguyen; Robert J. Norman; Maja Olic; Kristine L. Overfield; Maria Parker-Harris; Sjoerd Repping; Roberta Rizzo; Pietro Salacone; Catherine H. Saunders; Rinku Sengupta; Ioannis A. Sfontouris; Natalie R. Silverman; Helen L. Torrance; Eleonora P. Uphoff; Sarah A. Wakeman; Tewes Wischmann; Bryan J. Woodward; Mohamed A. Youssef
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 8.  Outcome reporting across randomized controlled trials evaluating potential treatments for male infertility: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael P Rimmer; Ruth A Howie; Venkatesh Subramanian; Richard A Anderson; Ricardo Pimenta Bertolla; Yusuf Beebeejaun; Pietro Bortoletto; Sesh K Sunkara; Rod T Mitchell; Allan Pacey; Madelon van Wely; Cindy M Farquhar; James M N Duffy; Craig Niederberger
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2022-03-04

9.  Systematic review of patient-specific pre-operative predictors of pain improvement to endometriosis surgery.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ball; Babu Karavadra; Bethany Jade Kremer-Yeatman; Connor Mustard; Kim May Lee; Sharandeep Bhogal; Julie Dodds; Andrew W Horne; John Allotey; Carol Rivas
Journal:  Reprod Fertil       Date:  2021-03-03

10.  Core outcomes in gestational diabetes for treatment trials: The Gestational Metabolic Group treatment set.

Authors:  Mohammed Bashir; Asma Syed; Luis Furuya-Kanamori; Omran A H Musa; Aisha M Mohamed; Monica Skarulis; Lukman Thalib; Justin C Konje; Abdul-Badi Abou-Samra; Suhail A R Doi
Journal:  Obes Sci Pract       Date:  2021-02-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.