| Literature DB >> 30273369 |
Marvin Blessings Moketla1, Antonia L Wadley2, Peter Kamerman2,3, Debra de Assis Rosa1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of the HIV antiretroviral drug stavudine (d4T), a thymidine analogue, is associated with the development of mitochondrial toxicities such as sensory neuropathy (SN). Genetic variation in genes relating to d4T transport and metabolism, as well as genetic variation in the thymidine synthesis pathway, could influence occurrence of d4T-related toxicity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30273369 PMCID: PMC6166924 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the cohort.
| 263 | 143 | 120 | - | |
| 205 (78%) | 110 (77%) | 95 (79%) | 0.333 | |
| 38 | 41 (7.7) | 36 (7.2) | ||
| 158.1 | 159.4 (8.7) | 156.4 (7.4) | ||
| 68.61 | 69.56 | 67.49 | 0.231 | |
| 27.55 | 27.45 | 27.66 | 0.970 | |
| 52 | 54 | 49 | 0.538 | |
| 398 (27–1091) | 406(27–1091) | 393(45–1079) | 0.407 | |
| 100 (1–403) | 101 (1–253) | 96 (2–403) | 0.762 | |
| 20 | 20 | 19 | 0.770 |
All values are means unless otherwise indicated.
n: sample size; std dev: standard deviation
Minor allele frequencies (MAF) in 243 black Southern Africans (SA) compared to MAF in 99 Luhya from Kenya (LWK).
| Chromosome | Gene | SNP | Major allele | Minor allele | MAF in SA | MAF in LWK (n = 99, 2n = 198) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs3749442 | G | A | 0.208 | 0.237 | 0.413 | ||
| rs2725252 | C | A | 0.193 | 0.222 | 0.402 | ||
| rs2622604 | C | T | 0.132 | 0.126 | 0.901 | ||
| rs12505410 | T | G | 0.122 | 0.126 | 0.898 | ||
| rs3114018 | A | C | 0.419 | 0.333 | |||
| rs4877847 | A | C | 0.470 | 0.475 | 0.932 | ||
| rs7853758 | G | A | 0.5 | 0.303 | |||
| rs2242046 | G | A | 0.025 | 0.061 | |||
| rs2290272 | G | A | 0.242 | 0.172 | 0.053 | ||
| rs8187758 | C | A | 0.155 | 0.131 | 0.477 | ||
| rs1465952 | G | A | 0.477 | 0.389 | |||
| rs11030918 | T | C | 0.20 | 0.167 | 0.335 | ||
| rs12806698 | C | A | 0.021 | 0.015 | 0.766 | ||
| rs1042927 | A | C | 0.181 | 0.263 | |||
| rs7574663 | C | G | 0.084 | 0.146 | |||
| rs16918482 | A | C | 0.064 | 0.076 | 0.615 | ||
| rs3743712 | A | G | 0.391 | 0.369 | 0.604 | ||
| rs11859474 | G | A | 0.263 | 0.293 | 0.449 | ||
| rs2288399 | A | G | 0.152 | 0.081 | |||
| rs1801131 | T | G | 0.144 | 0.187 | 0.165 | ||
| rs1801133 | G | A | 0.070 | 0.071 | 1.000 | ||
| rs1650723 | C | T | 0.062 | 0.071 | 0.731 | ||
| rs8124728 | G | A | 0.169 | 0.152 | 0.649 | ||
| rs1291142 | A | G | 0.231 | 0.237 | 0.921 | ||
| rs1891643 | A | G | 0.187 | 0.207 | 0.593 | ||
| rs1051266 | T | C | 0.311 | 0.308 | 1.000 |
All SNPs are on forward strand. P values in bold indicate P<0.05, Fisher’s exact test
Gene polymorphisms significantly associated with SN after d4T use.
| Gene | SNP | Univariate analysis Pemp value | Model of association | Multivariable analysis Pemp value | Multivariable analysis P value | OR in multivariable analysis (95% CI) | (Minor allele) direction of effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs8187758 | genotypic | 0.249 | 0.060 | 1.89 (0.61–5.86) | (A) risk | ||
| rs8124728 | genotypic | 0.709 | 0.45 (0.19–1.05) | (A) protective | |||
| rs8124728 | 0.092 | recessive | 0.18 (0.03–0.98) | (A) protective | |||
| rs1891643 | 0.280 | recessive | 0.075 | 5.08 (0.85–30.44) | (G) risk | ||
| rs8124728, rs1291142, rs1891643 | 0.073 | haplotype GGA | 0.33 (0.07–0.98) | (GGA) protective | |||
| rs1801131 | 0.198 | recessive | 0.146 | 0.12 (0.01–2.07) | (G) protective | ||
| rs1801131 | 0.244 | genotypic | 0.224 | 0.33 (0.08–1.39) | (G) protective | ||
| rs16918482 | 0.509 | recessive | 0.772 | 0.65 (0.04–11.60) | (C) protective | ||
| rs16918482 | 0.416 | genotypic | 0.954 | 0.81 (0.19–3.26) | (C) protective |
1 Pemp values were from permutation analysis during multiple logistic regression using 10 000 simulations; Uncorrected Pemp values < 0.05 were considered significant and are shown in bold.
2 multivariable tests took into account age and height as covariates
3 P values were standard results from coefficient t-tests during multiple logistic regression and were used to calculate OR and direction of effect.
4 OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval