| Literature DB >> 30271837 |
Mika Kawagishi-Hotta1,2,3, Seiji Hasegawa1,3,4, Toshio Igarashi1, Takaaki Yamada1,2,4, Masayuki Takahashi4, Shigeki Numata4, Tsukane Kobayashi4, Yohei Iwata4, Masaru Arima4, Naoki Yamamoto5, Akiko Yagami4, Satoru Nakata1, Tohru Uzawa6, Kayoko Matsunaga4, Kazumitsu Sugiura4, Hirohiko Akamatsu2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) are a robust, multipotent cell source. They are easily obtained and hold promise in many regenerative applications. It is generally considered that the function of somatic stem cells declines with age. Although several studies have examined the effects of donor age on proliferation potential and pluripotency of ASCs, the results of these studies were not consistent.Entities:
Keywords: Adipose-derived stem cells; Aging effects; CFU-F, colony-forming unit-fibroblast; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; Differentiation; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; GAGs, glycosaminoglycans; Individual differences; PCA, principal component analysis; PDL, population doubling level; Principal component analysis; αMEM, α minimum essential medium
Year: 2017 PMID: 30271837 PMCID: PMC6134902 DOI: 10.1016/j.reth.2016.12.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Regen Ther ISSN: 2352-3204 Impact factor: 3.419
Primers used for real-time quantitative PCR.
| Gene | Forward sequence | Reverse sequence |
|---|---|---|
| GADPH | TGCACCACCAACTGCTTAGC | TCTTCTGGGTGGCAGTGATG |
| CD44 | CGTGATGGCACCCGCTAT | GGGTAGATGTCTTCAGGATTCGTT |
| CD73 | ACTGGGACATTCGGGTTTTG | GACGTCCACACCCCTCACTT |
| CD90 | CCGCTCCCGAACCAACT | GGCGGATAAGTAGAGGACCTTCA |
| CD105 | ATCACCACAGCGGAAAAAGG | GGTAGAGGCCCAGCTGGAA |
| CD271 | CATCCTGGCTGCTGTGGTT | TGCAGCTGTTCCACCTCTTG |
| NANOG | CCTTCCTCCATGGATCTGCTT | AAGTGGGTTGTTTGCCTTTGG |
Fig. 1Effect of donor age on the number and CFU-F of SVF cells. (A) The number of SVF cells per gram separated from adipose tissue was not correlated with donor age (n = 251). SVF cells were obtained from adipose tissue of all donors. There was no correlation between the numbers of SVF cells and donor age (r = 0.103). (B) CFU assay was performed on fresh SVF cells (n = 75, 10–96 years old). There was no correlation between the number of colonies and donor age (r = 0.037). The correlation coefficient was determined by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, and the significance was tested by a test for no correlation.
Fig. 2Effect of donor age on the reciprocal of doubling time in cultured ASCs. (A) Each open diamond indicates an ASC sample from a single donor. Cell population doubling time (hours) at passage 4 of ASCs obtained from 254 subjects was shown with donor age. The correlation coefficient by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was r = 0.099 indicating no correlation between the proliferation potentials and donor age. (B) Observation of cellular morphology for ASCs under phase contrast microscopy at passage 4 (×100). a–c show representative ASC samples having a different degree of proliferation potential, indicated by red triangles in A. (C–H) Examination of expression of MSC surface markers such as CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, CD271 and stemness marker (NANOG) by using qPCR. n = 9 each for high and low group (young group: <40 years of age, elderly group: ≥60 years of age). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Fig. 3Effect of donor age on adipogenic potential of ASCs. Adipogenic differentiation was analyzed by extracted Oil Red O concentration. (A) Normalized concentration of eluted Oil Red O from ASCs of each donor (n = 260; 5–97 years old) showed a significant correlation with age, r = −0.283; **p < 0.01. The correlation was calculated by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient test. (B) d–f show Oil Red O-stained lipid inclusions of ASCs from representative donors having a different degree of adipogenic potential, indicated by red triangles in A. (C–H) Examination of expression of MSC surface markers, CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, CD271 and stemness marker (NANOG) by using qPCR. n = 10 each for high and low group (young group: <40 years of age, elderly group: ≥60 years of age). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Fig. 4Effect of donor age on osteogenic potential of ASCs. Osteogenic differentiation was analyzed by calcium (Ca) deposition. (A) Normalized quantification of Ca deposition from ASCs of each donor (n = 260; 5–97 years old) did not show a correlation with age (r = −0.005), but large variations were noted. The correlation was calculated by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient test. (B) g–i show Alizarin red-stained ASCs of representative donors having a different degree of osteogenic potential, indicated by red triangles in A. (C–H) Examination of expression of MSC surface markers, CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, CD271 and stemness marker (NANOG) by using qPCR. n = 10 each for high and low group (young group: <40 years of age, elderly group: ≥60 years of age). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Fig. 5Effect of donor age on chondrogenic potential of ASCs. Chondrogenic differentiation was analyzed by GAG synthesis. (A) Normalized quantification of GAG synthesis from ASCs of each donor (n = 260; 5–97 years old) did not show a correlation with age (r = 0.059), but a large variation was noted. The correlation was calculated by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient test. (B) j–l show cellular deposition of ASCs of representative donors having different degrees of chondrogenic potentials, indicated by red triangles in A. (C–H) Examination of expression of MSC surface markers, CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, CD271 and stemness marker (NANOG) by using qPCR. n = 10 each for high and low group (young group: <40 years of age, elderly group: ≥60 years of age). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. Bars = 1 mm.
Fig. 6Principal component analysis of ASC potentials (proliferation and differentiation of adipogenesis, osteogenesis and chondrogenesis). ASCs of each age group are plotted in the first and the second principal components which account for 33% and 27% of variance, respectively. Gray areas indicate probable ellipse (95%) areas. Both sexes (A), males (B), females (C). (D–F) Box plots indicate spread data of the distances between the center of prediction ellipse and each distribution point. In total, individual differences of ASCs were significantly increased after the age of 60's. *p < 0.05. (E) For males, individual differences significantly increased over 80 years old, when the combined age group of 20's and 30's was referred to as a control. (F) ASCs from females showed a significant increase over 60, when compared with the age group of 20.