| Literature DB >> 27029948 |
C C West1,2, W R Hardy3, I R Murray1, A W James3, M Corselli3,4, S Pang3, C Black3,5, S E Lobo3,6, K Sukhija3,7, P Liang3,8, V Lagishetty3,9, D C Hay1, K L March10, K Ting3,11, C Soo3,12,13, B Péault14,15.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adipose tissue is an attractive source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) as it is largely dispensable and readily accessible through minimally invasive procedures such as liposuction. Until recently MSC could only be isolated in a process involving ex-vivo culture and their in-vivo identity, location and frequency remained elusive. We have documented that pericytes (CD45-, CD146+, and CD34-) and adventitial cells (CD45-, CD146-, CD34+) (collectively termed perivascular stem cells or PSC) represent native ancestors of the MSC, and can be prospectively purified using fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS). In this study we describe an optimized protocol that aims to deliver pure, viable and consistent yields of PSC from adipose tissue. We analysed the frequency of PSC within adipose tissue, and the effect of patient and procedure based variables on this yield.Entities:
Keywords: Adipose tissue; Adipose-derived stem cell; Cell sorting; Flow cytometry; Mesenchymal stem cells; Pericyte; Tunica adventitia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27029948 PMCID: PMC4815276 DOI: 10.1186/s13287-016-0302-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther ISSN: 1757-6512 Impact factor: 6.832
Demographic data of the 131 donors
| Demographic data ( | |
|---|---|
| Sex | Female = 112 |
| Male = 19 | |
| Age (years) | Mean = 41 (range 22–64) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | Mean = 26.5 (range 19–43) |
| SVF (cells × 106) | Mean = 34.4 (range 4.7–120) |
| Viability (%) | Mean = 83 % (range 36–99) |
| Pericytes (%) | Mean = 8 % (range 0–55) |
| Adventitial cells (%) | Mean = 33.0 % (range 3–72) |
| PSC total (%) | Mean = 41 % (range 6–78) |
| PSC yield (cells × 106) | Mean = 11.6 (range 1.1–47.2) |
BMI body mass index, PSC perivascular stem cell, SVF stromal vascular fraction
Fig. 1Gating strategies for the isolation of PSC from the SVF. Gate 1 = cells, Gate 2 = single cells, Gate 3 = live cells, Gate 4 = CD45 (nonhaematopoietic cells), Gate 5 = CD31– (nonendothelial cells), Gate ADV = adventitial cells (CD31, CD45, CD34, CD146), and Gate PERI = pericytes (CD31, CD45, CD34, CD146). DAPI 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, FSC forward scatter, SSC side scatter
Fig. 2a, b. Linear fit of SVF yield and PSC yield (× 106) per 100 ml of lipoaspirate with respect to donor age (n = 124, R = 0.07 and 0.09 respectively). c, d. One-way analysis of variance of SVF and PSC yields (× 106) vs donor gender (n = 131; male = 19, female = 112): green diamonds reflect the mean yield (center line) and 95 % confidence interval (vertical span) for each gender, and the grand mean in gray. Linear fit of SVF yield e and proportion of PSCs comprising the SVF f with respect to donor BMI (n = 97, R = 0.05 and 0.01 respectively). BMI body mass index, F female, lipo lipoaspirate, M male, PSC perivascular stem cell, SVF stromal vascular fraction (Color figure online)
Fig. 3One-way analysis of variance analysis of the number and proportion of cells recovered with respect to storage time at 4 °C. a PSC yield (× 106) per 100 ml of lipoaspirate showing a gradual increase with longer storage times; however, this is a relative effect due to the deceasing number of CD45+ hematopoietic cells seen in b. Green diamonds indicate the mean and 95 % confidence interval for each storage time interval, while the gray line represents the grand or overall mean. Hrs hours, PSC perivascular stem cell, SVF stromal vascular fraction (Color figure online)
Fig. 4Statistical control chart demonstrating that optimization improved the reproducibility of PSC isolation and confirming that both the UCLA and UK isolation processes are under statistical control. A Levey-Jennings chart depicting individual data points for PSC yield (×106) obtained from 100 ml of lipoaspirate using the UCLA isolation process, before and after optimization, as compared with the UK process (n = 131). The central green line represents the general mean and is delimited by upper and lower control limits (red lines) based upon a 3σ interval. PSC perivascular stem cell, SD standard deviation, SVF stromal vascular fraction, UCLA University of California at Los Angeles (Color figure online)
Fig. 5Improvements in PSC purity. a Optimization of the PSC isolation process has led to increased purity of cells, as indicated by enrichment for the adventitial cell antigen CD34 (left), and the dramatic reduction in the endothelial cell antigen CD31 (middle) and haematopoietic marker CD45 (right) by real-time quantitative PCR (n = 7; pre optimization = 4, post optimization = 3). b (Left) FSC vs SSC demonstrating the population of lymphocytes (arrow). (Centre) Confirmation of lymphocytes by demonstration of CD45+ phenotype of the subpopulation. (Right) Selection of the CD45– depleted cellular fraction for subsequent analysis. FSC Forward scatter, PSC perivascular stem cell, SSC side scatter
Potential clinical applications and the amount of adipose tissue required to provide sufficient numbers of prospectively purified perivascular stem cells to eliminate the need for ex-vivo expansion
| Clinical use | Estimated number of cells required | Amount of fat needed |
|---|---|---|
| Tissue engineered tendon | 1.5 million/cm | 12 ml/cm |
| Tissue engineered mandible | 10 million/cm | 80 ml/cm |
| Cartilage for nasal reconstruction | 20 million | 160 ml |
| Scaphoid nonunion | 25 million | 200 ml |
| Tibial nonuniona | 40 million | 320 ml |
| Total ear reconstruction | 50 million | 400 ml |
| Critical limb ischemiaa | 2 million cells/kg | 16 ml/kg |
| Graft versus host diseasea | 0.5–13 million cells/kg | 4.8–125 ml/kg |
| (repeat doses required) |
aData from clinicaltrials.gov