| Literature DB >> 30271791 |
Borden Mushonga1, Dismas Habumugisha2, Erick Kandiwa1, Oscar Madzingira1, Alaster Samkange1, Basiamisi Ernest Segwagwe3, Ishmael Festus Jaja4.
Abstract
This study investigated the overall prevalence of Haemonchus contortus infection in sheep and goats from five purposively selected subdivisions (sectors) of Nyagatare district from January to December 2014, after a high prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites and generalized poor productivity was reported in small ruminants in some districts of Rwanda. Faecal egg counts (FEC) were performed using the Modified Wisconsin Sugar Floatation method and the Fluorescent-labeled peanut-lectin agglutination test while enumerations, as log (FEC), were done using the modified McMaster method. The overall prevalence of H. contortus infection in sheep and goats was 75.7% (n=949). The overall prevalence of H. contortus infection in sheep (83.4%, n=314) was higher than in goats (71.8%, n=635) (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.98, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.40-2.79, and p≤0.001). The prevalence of H. contortus infection in female goats (74.2%) was higher than in male goats (64.3%) (OR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.09-2.36, and p=0.01). The prevalence of H. contortus infection in goats from Nyagatare was higher than in goats from Matimba (OR 3.25, 95% CI: 1.76-5.99, and p≤0.001) and from Katabagemu (OR 3.67, 95% CI: 2.04-6.59, and p≤0.001). The prevalence of H. contortus infection in goats from Karangazi was higher than in goats from Matimba (OR 4.72, 95% CI: 2.40-9.28, and p≤0.001). The overall mean monthly log (FEC) for H. contortus in sheep and goats were highest in April (18.9±0.2 and 14.05±0.1, respectively) and October (19.25± 0.2 and 13.75±0.1, respectively). Though, overall, sheep in Nyagatare district were at greater risk of H. contortus infection and goats from Nyagatare and Karangazi sectors were paradoxically at greater risk of H. contortus infection. It was also apparent that young female goats were at greater risk of H. contortus infection than young male goats. H. contortus infection is endemic in small ruminants in Nyagatare district and possibly other districts in Rwanda. Targeted selective treatment (TST) using FAMACHA with emphasis on low-lying swampy pastures and appropriate anthelmintic drugs may be the most economically viable solution in the short term. In the long term breeding of H. contortus resistant small ruminants and strategic grazing using the concept of refugia may bring about considerable relief from H. contortus infection in Nyagatare district, in particular, and Rwanda at large.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30271791 PMCID: PMC6146870 DOI: 10.1155/2018/3602081
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Med ISSN: 2314-6966
Figure 1Map of Nyagatare district's potentialities wetlands. Source: http://www.nyagatare.gov.rw/fileadmin/templates/Raports/Nyagatare_Potentialities.pdf.
Prevalence of H. contortus infectionin small ruminants of Nyagatare district.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Male sheep | 111 (83.5) | 22 (16.5) | 133 (42.4) |
| Adult male | 41 (82.0) | 9 (18.0) | 50 (15.9) |
| Young male | 70 (84.3) | 13 (15.7) | 83 (26.4) |
| Female sheep | 151 (83.4) | 30 (16.6) | 181 (57.6) |
| Adult female | 103 (85.8) | 17 (14.2) | 120 (38.2) |
| Young female | 48 (78.7) | 13 (21.3) | 61 (19.4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Male goats | 99 (64.3) | 55 (35.7) | 154 (24.3) |
| Adult male | 42 (66.7) | 21 (33.3) | 63 (9.9) |
| Young male | 57 (62.6) | 34 (37.4) | 91 (14.3) |
| Female goats | 357 (74.2) | 124 (25.8) | 481 (75.7) |
| Adult female | 221 (74.2) | 77 (25.8) | 298 (46.9) |
| Young female | 136 (74.3) | 47 (25.7) | 183 (28.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison of H. contortus infections between and within species.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Sheep versus goats | 1.98 (1.40-2.79) | ≤0.001 |
| Adult sheep versus adult goats | 2.06 (1.28-3.33) | ≤0.001 |
| Young sheep versus young goats | 1.90 (1.16-3.13) | 0.01 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Males versus females | 1.00 (0.55-1.83) | 0.56 |
| Adult females versus adult males | 1.33 (0.55-3.22) | 0.34 |
| Young males versus young females | 1.46 (0.62-3.42) | 0.26 |
| Young males versus adult males | 1.18 (0.46-3.01) | 0.45 |
| Adult females versus young females | 1.64 (0.74-3.65) | 0.16 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Females versus males | 1.60 (1.09-2.36) | 0.01 |
| Adult females versus adult males | 1.44 (0.80-2.57) | 0.15 |
| Young females versus young males | 1.73 (1.01-2.96) | 0.03 |
| Adult males versus young males | 1.19 (0.61-2.34) | 0.37 |
| Young females versus adult females | 1.01 (0.66-1.54) | 0.53 |
∗Significant difference since p≤0.05.
Prevalence of H. contortus infectionin sheep and goats in the five sectors of Nyagatare district.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Animals positive (%) | 73 (88.0) | 55 (90.2) | 41 (70.7) | 48 (73.8) | 53 (72.6) | 262 (83.4) |
| Animals negative (%) | 10 (12.0) | 6 (9.8) | 11 (19.0) | 12 (18.5) | 13 (17.8) | 52 (16.6) |
|
| ||||||
| Animals positive (%) | 117 (85.4) | 119 (89.5) | 65 (55.1) | 72 (64.3) | 83 (61.5) | 456 (71.8) |
| Animals negative (%) | 20 (14.6) | 14 (10.5) | 53 (44.9) | 40 (35.7) | 52 (38.5) | 179 (28.2) |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison of H. contortus infections in sheep between sectors.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Karangazi versus Nyagatare | 1.26 (0.43-3.66) | 0.45 |
| Nyagatare versus Tabagwe | 1.95 (0.77-5.00) | 0.12 |
| Nyagatare versus Matimba | 1.83 (0.73-4.56) | 0.14 |
| Nyagatare versus Katabagemu | 1.79 (0.73-4.39) | 0.15 |
| Karangazi versus Tabagwe | 2.46 (0.84-7.20) | 0.08 |
| Karangazi versus Matimba | 2.29 (0.80-6.57) | 0.09 |
| Karangazi versus Katabagemu | 2.25 (0.80-6.35) | 0.10 |
| Matimba versus Tabagwe | 1.07 (0.43-2.69) | 0.53 |
| Katabagemu versus Tabagwe | 1.09 (0.44-2.69) | 0.51 |
| Katabagemu versus Matimba | 1.02 (0.42-2.45) | 0.57 |
Comparison of H. contortus infections in goats between sectors.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Karangazi versus Nyagatare | 1.45 (0.70-3.01) | 0.20 |
| Nyagatare versus Tabagwe | 4.77 (2.63-8.67) | 7.61 |
| Nyagatare versus Matimba | 3.25 (1.76-5.99) | ≤0.001 |
| Nyagatare versus Katabagemu | 3.67 (2.04-6.59) | ≤0.001 |
| Karangazi versus Tabagwe | 6.93 (3.58-13.44) | 4.72 |
| Karangazi versus Matimba | 4.72 (2.40-9.28) | ≤0.001 |
| Karangazi versus Katabagemu | 5.33 (2.77-10.23) | 5.99 |
| Matimba versus Tabagwe | 1.47 (0.86-2.49) | 0.10 |
| Katabagemu versus Tabagwe | 1.30 (0.79-2.15) | 0.18 |
| Matimba versus Katabagemu | 1.13 (0.67-1.90) | 0.37 |
∗Significant difference since p≤0.05.
Figure 2Monthly log (FEC) trends in sheep and goats for the five sectors in Nyagatare district in 2014.
Figure 3Mean monthly log (FEC) trends for goats per sector in Nyagatare district in 2014.
Figure 4Mean monthly log (FEC) for sheep per sector in Nyagatare district in 2014.