| Literature DB >> 30271620 |
Shrikant Pawar1,2,1,2, Harshul Batra3,3.
Abstract
AIM: Animal experiments tend to generate large-scale data. Some existing tools like Microsoft Excel and colony management cloud-based tools are either cumbersome or expensive. There is a need for an inexpensive and uncomplicated colony management software with specific individual database solutions.Entities:
Keywords: SQL database; colony management; recordkeeping; rodent; transgenic
Year: 2018 PMID: 30271620 PMCID: PMC6153456 DOI: 10.4155/fsoa-2018-0054
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Future Sci OA ISSN: 2056-5623
Some of the currently available tools are listed.
| MausDB | Free | Oracle | No info | |
| JCMS | Free | MySQL | Windows, Mac | |
| mLims | No info | No info | No info | |
| Facility | No info | No info | No info | |
| SoftmouseDB | Paid | Cloud | Windows, Mac | |
| MouseJ | Free | Windows. NET | Windows | |
| Mouse colony | Paid | Windows, Mac | ||
| PyRAT | Paid | MySQL | Windows, Mac | |
| ezColony | Paid | Cloud | Windows, Mac | |
| Mosaic vivarium | Paid | No info | No info | |
Depiction of the workflow management for software.
The snapshot of some software interfaces.
(A) Interface window for recording, updating and deleting animal records. (B) Cage card writing window. (C) Pedigree/family tree window. (D) Printing cage card and generating a unique bar code for cage cards.
Advantages of RodentSQL over commercially available colony management software.
| RodentSQL | + | + | Yes | ++ | All Rodents | No |
| MausDB | + | + | No | + | Mouse | No |
| JCMS | ++ | + | Yes | ++ | Mouse | No |
| mLIMS | +++ | ++ | No | + | Mouse | No |
| SoftmouseDB | + | + | Yes | +++ | Mouse | No |
| MouseJ | ++ | ++ | No | + | Mouse | No |
| Mouse colony | +++ | + | No | + | Mouse | No |
| PyRAT | ++ | ++ | Yes | +++ | Rat | Yes |
| ezColony | + | + | Yes | ++ | Mouse | No |