Literature DB >> 30270684

Lower uterine segment thickness in assessing whether cesarean scar pregnancy patients could be treated with suction curettage.

Sheng Wang1, Ya Li1, Xiangyi Ma1.   

Abstract

Background: To find a suitable indicator in selecting appropriate patients with cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) for treatment with ultrasound-guided suction curettage alone.
Methods: A retrospective review of all women with CSP treated at the Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, China, between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2015 was conducted. The women were grouped according to the following management options: ultrasound-guided suction curettage only (Group 1); combination with other therapeutic options (Group 2). The clinical characteristics and outcomes were analyzed.
Results: Of 174 patients with lower uterine segment myometrium thickness ≥0.2 cm, 93 (53.4%) patients underwent ultrasound-guided suction curettage only, 81 (46.6%) patients underwent a combination with other therapeutics. Clinical characteristics of women who underwent ultrasound-guided suction curettage alone did not significantly differ from those who were treated with combination. Intraoperative blood loss and length of stay differed significantly between the two groups.Conclusions: In appropriate CSP cases with lower uterine segment myometrium thickness more than 0.2 cm, ultrasound-guided suction curettage appears to be a reliable treatment option producing satisfying success rates, lower blood loss, and a shorter hospital-stay compared to combined therapies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean scar pregnancy; lower uterine segment thickness; management; primary evacuation therapy; suction curettage

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30270684     DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1531118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  4 in total

1.  The effect of prophylactic uterine artery embolization on reproductive outcomes in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy: a propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Jiao Wang; Dandan Wang; Xinyue Zhang; Yuting Liu; Qing Yang; Ningning Zhang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Evaluation of the treatment of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy.

Authors:  Lin Mu; Huifang Weng; Xiaoyun Wang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Assessment of the necessity of uterine artery embolization during suction and curettage for caesarean scar pregnancy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jie Ou; Ping Peng; Chunying Li; Lirong Teng; Xinyan Liu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Evaluation of the necessity of laparoscopic repair of a uterine scar defect for cesarean scar pregnancy.

Authors:  Jiangdong Xiang; Yannan Cao; Lina Zhou; Haiying Yang; Sufang Wu; Linxia Li
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.671

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.