Literature DB >> 30269254

Drought timing, not previous drought exposure, determines sensitivity of two shortgrass species to water stress.

Nathan P Lemoine1,2, Robert J Griffin-Nolan3,4, Abigail D Lock3, Alan K Knapp3,4.   

Abstract

Climate change will alter global precipitation patterns, making it increasingly important that we understand how ecosystems will be impacted by more frequent and severe droughts. Yet most drought studies examine a single, within-season drought, and we know relatively little about the impacts of multiple droughts that occur within a single growing season. This distinction is important because many plant species are able to acclimate physiologically, such that the effects of multiple droughts on ecosystem function deviate significantly from the effects of cumulative, independent droughts. Unfortunately, we know relatively little about the ability of dominant species to acclimate to drought in drought-sensitive ecosystems like semi-arid grasslands. Here, we tested for physiological acclimation to multiple drought events in two dominant shortgrass steppe species: Bouteloua gracilis (C4) and Elymus elymoides (C3). Neither species exhibited physiological acclimation to drought; leaf water potential, stomatal conductance, and photosynthesis rates were all similarly affected by a single, late period drought and a second, late period drought. Biomass was lowest in plants exposed to two droughts, but this is likely due to the cumulative effects of both an early and late period drought. Our results suggest that late period droughts do exert weaker effects on biomass production of two dominant shortgrass species, but that the weaker effects are due to ontogenetic changes in plant physiology as opposed to physiological acclimation against multiple droughts. As a consequence, current ecosystem models that incorporate grass phenology and seasonal physiology should provide accurate predictions of primary production under future climates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Leaf water potential; Photosynthesis; Plant phenology; Soil moisture; Stomatal conductance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30269254     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-018-4265-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  21 in total

1.  Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plants: stomatal and non-stomatal limitations revisited.

Authors:  J Flexas; H Medrano
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Variation among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary production.

Authors:  A K Knapp; M D Smith
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Responses of plant phenology, growth, defense, and reproduction to interactive effects of warming and insect herbivory.

Authors:  Nathan P Lemoine; Dejeanne Doublet; Juha-Pekka Salminen; Deron E Burkepile; John D Parker
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Rainfall variability, carbon cycling, and plant species diversity in a mesic grassland.

Authors:  Alan K Knapp; Philip A Fay; John M Blair; Scott L Collins; Melinda D Smith; Jonathan D Carlisle; Christopher W Harper; Brett T Danner; Michelle S Lett; James K McCarron
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Characterizing differences in precipitation regimes of extreme wet and dry years: implications for climate change experiments.

Authors:  Alan K Knapp; David L Hoover; Kevin R Wilcox; Meghan L Avolio; Sally E Koerner; Kimberly J La Pierre; Michael E Loik; Yiqi Luo; Osvaldo E Sala; Melinda D Smith
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 10.863

6.  Anthropogenic warming has increased drought risk in California.

Authors:  Noah S Diffenbaugh; Daniel L Swain; Danielle Touma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Response of photosynthesis to high light and drought for Arabidopsis thaliana grown under a UV-B enhanced light regime.

Authors:  Mary E Poulson; Maria Regina Torres Boeger; Raymon A Donahue
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Linking nitrogen partitioning and species abundance to invasion resistance in the Great Basin.

Authors:  J J James; K W Davies; R L Sheley; Z T Aanderud
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Differences in drought sensitivities and photosynthetic limitations between co-occurring C3 and C4 (NADP-ME) Panicoid grasses.

Authors:  Brad Ripley; Kristen Frole; Matthew Gilbert
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Prospective evidence for independent nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of grasshopper (Chorthippus curtipennis) growth in a tallgrass prairie.

Authors:  Madison Rode; Nathan P Lemoine; Melinda D Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Transcriptome analysis and molecular mechanism of linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) drought tolerance under repeated drought using single-molecule long-read sequencing.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Lei Wang; Ling Wang; Meilian Tan; Collins O Ogutu; Ziyan Yin; Jian Zhou; Jiaomei Wang; Lijun Wang; Xingchu Yan
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.969

2.  Climate variability supersedes grazing to determine the anatomy and physiology of a dominant grassland species.

Authors:  Seton Bachle; Jesse B Nippert
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.225

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.