Literature DB >> 30269234

Effectiveness of surgery for sciatica with disc herniation is not substantially affected by differences in surgical incidences among three countries: results from the Danish, Swedish and Norwegian spine registries.

Tobias Lagerbäck1,2, Peter Fritzell3,4,5,6, Olle Hägg6,7, Dennis Nordvall8, Greger Lønne9,10,11, Tore K Solberg11,12,13, Mikkel Ø Andersen14,15, Søren Eiskjær16, Martin Gehrchen17, Wilco C Jacobs18, Miranda L van Hooff19,20, Paul Gerdhem21,22,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Yearly incidence of surgery for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation varies and is 29/100,000 in Sweden, 46/100,000 in Denmark and 58/100,000 in Norway. This variation was used to study whether differences in surgical incidence were associated with differences in preoperative patient characteristics as well as patient-reported outcomes.
METHODS: Data from the national spine registers in Sweden, Denmark and Norway during 2011-2013 were pooled, and 9965 individuals, aged 18-65 years, of which 6468 had one-year follow-up data, were included in the study. Both absolute and case-mix-adjusted comparisons of the primary outcome Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the secondary outcomes EQ-5D-3L, and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for leg and back pain were performed. Case-mix adjustment was done for baseline age, sex, BMI, smoking, co-morbidity, duration of leg pain and preoperative value of the dependent variable.
RESULTS: Mean improvement in the outcome variables exceeded previously described minimal clinical important change in all countries. Mean (95% CI) final scores of ODI were 18 (17-18), 19 (18-20) and 15 (15-16) in Sweden, Denmark and Norway, respectively. Corresponding results of EQ-5D-3L were 0.74 (0.73-0.75), 0.73 (0.72-0.75) and 0.75 (0.74-0.76). Results of NRS leg and back pain behaved similarly. Case-mix adjustment did not alter the findings substantially.
CONCLUSION: We found no clear association between incidence of surgery for lumbar disc herniation and preoperative patient characteristics as well as outcome, and the differences between the countries were lower than the minimal clinical important difference in all outcomes. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lumbar disc herniation; Outcome; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30269234     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5768-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  27 in total

Review 1.  The Oswestry Disability Index.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; P B Pynsent
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Prevalence and risk factors of disk-related sciatica in an urban population in Tunisia.

Authors:  Mohamed Younes; Ismail Béjia; Zouhour Aguir; Mondher Letaief; Saoussen Hassen-Zrour; Mongi Touzi; Naceur Bergaoui
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  Orthopaedic operations in the United States, 1979 through 1983.

Authors:  I M Rutkow
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Outcomes of Posterolateral Fusion with and without Instrumentation and of Interbody Fusion for Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Peter Endler; Per Ekman; Hans Möller; Paul Gerdhem
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  O Hägg; P Fritzell; A Nordwall
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-10-24       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Patient-reported outcome measures unbiased by loss of follow-up. Single-center study based on DaneSpine, the Danish spine surgery registry.

Authors:  Karen Højmark; C Støttrup; L Carreon; M O Andersen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Comparison of US and Canadian Perioperative Outcomes and Hospital Efficiency After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Adam Hart; Stephane G Bergeron; Laura Epure; Olga Huk; David Zukor; John Antoniou
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica.

Authors:  Wilco C Peul; Hans C van Houwelingen; Wilbert B van den Hout; Ronald Brand; Just A H Eekhof; Joseph T J Tans; Ralph T W M Thomeer; Bart W Koes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Surgery versus conservative management of sciatica due to a lumbar herniated disc: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wilco C H Jacobs; Maurits van Tulder; Mark Arts; Sidney M Rubinstein; Marienke van Middelkoop; Raymond Ostelo; Arianne Verhagen; Bart Koes; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Swespine: the Swedish spine register : the 2012 report.

Authors:  Björn Strömqvist; Peter Fritzell; Olle Hägg; Bo Jönsson; Bengt Sandén
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  2 in total

1.  Can a Successful Outcome After Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation Be Defined by the Oswestry Disability Index Raw Score?

Authors:  David A T Werner; Margreth Grotle; Sasha Gulati; Ivar M Austevoll; Mattis A Madsbu; Greger Lønne; Tore K Solberg
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-06-06

2.  Is surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation worthwhile or futile? A single center observational study with patient reported outcomes.

Authors:  Vetle Vangen Lønne; Mattis A Madsbu; Øyvind Salvesen; Øystein Nygaard; Tore K Solberg; Sasha Gulati
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2022-05-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.