| Literature DB >> 30268990 |
Ines M Mürner-Lavanchy1, Claire E Kelly2, Natalie Reidy2, Lex W Doyle3, Katherine J Lee4, Terrie Inder5, Deanne K Thompson6, Angela T Morgan7, Peter J Anderson8.
Abstract
Very preterm birth is associated with altered white matter microstructure and language difficulties, which may compromise communication, social function and academic achievement, but the relationship between these two factors is unclear. The aim of this study was to explore associations between white matter microstructure and language domains of semantics, grammar and phonological awareness at 7-years of age on a whole-brain level and within the arcuate fasciculus, an important language pathway, in very preterm and term-born children. Language was assessed in 145 very preterm-born (<30 weeks' gestation and/or <1250 g birth weight) and 33 term-born children aged 7 years. Fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusivity (AD), radial diffusivity (RD), mean diffusivity (MD), axon orientation dispersion and axon density were estimated from diffusion magnetic resonance images also obtained at 7 years. The correlation between diffusion values and language was assessed using Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS). The arcuate fasciculus was delineated using constrained spherical deconvolution tractography and diffusion parameters from this tract were related to language measures using linear regression. While there was evidence for widespread associations between white matter microstructure and language, there was little evidence of differences in these associations between very preterm and term-born groups. TBSS analyses revealed that higher FA and lower AD, RD, and MD in major fibre tracts, including those subserving language, were associated with better semantic, grammar and phonological awareness performance. Higher axon density in widespread fibre tracts was also associated with better semantic performance. The tractography analyses of the arcuate fasciculus showed some evidence for associations between white matter microstructure and language outcomes. White matter microstructural organisation in widespread fibre tracts, including language-relevant pathways, was associated with language performance in whole-brain and tract-based analyses. The associations were similar for very preterm and term-born groups, despite very preterm children performing more poorly across language domains.Entities:
Keywords: Diffusion-weighted imaging; Language; Magnetic resonance imaging; NODDI; Preterm birth
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30268990 PMCID: PMC6169247 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.09.020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Participant characteristics.
| Variable | Very Preterm ( | Term-born (n = 33) |
|---|---|---|
| Gestational age at birth (weeks) – median (range) | 28 (10) | 39 (4) |
| Birth weight (g) – median (range) | 955 (1011) | 3300 (1900) |
| Females – n (%) | 74 (51.7) | 17 (51.5) |
| Singleton – n (%) | 72 (50.3) | 31 (93.9) |
| IVH grade III/IV – n (%) | 5 (3.5) | 0 (0) |
| Cystic PVL – n (%) | 5 (3.5) | 0 (0) |
| BPD – n (%) | 43 (30.1) | 0 (0) |
| Postnatal corticosteroids – n (%) | 7 (4.9) | 0 (0) |
| Antenatal corticosteroids – n (%) | 127 (88.8) | 0 (0) |
| Patent ductus arteriosus – n (%) | 67 (46.9) | 0 (0) |
| Small for gestational age – n (%) | 12 (8.4) | 1 (3.0) |
| Length of hospital stay (days) – median (IQR) | 78 (30) | 5 (2) |
| Age at 7-year scan (years) – mean (SD) | 7.5 (0.3) | 7.6 (0.2) |
| Language Content Index – mean (SD) | 97.8 (15.2) | 110.1 (9.4) |
| Language Structure Index – mean (SD) | 95.6 (15.6) | 107.4 (12.2) |
| Phonological Processing – mean (SD) | 9.6 (3.1) | 10.8 (2.6) |
BPD = bronchopulmonary dysplasia; IQR = inter-quartile range; IVH = intraventricular haemorrhage, PVL = periventricular leukomalacia; SD = standard deviation.
Missing data in 2 children.
missing data in 5 children
missing data in 2 children.
Fig. 1Regions where there is evidence (p < .05, family-wise error corrected) of associations between white matter microstructure parameters and semantic performance when assessed in all children. P-values in red-yellow = positive correlations and dark to light blue = negative associations. P-value maps have been overlaid on the standard space (MNI152) T1-weighted image. The scatter plots show the average diffusion value (y-axis) from the significant regions for each participant against semantic performance (x-axis) for each participant (VPT in white and term-born children in green). Only associations, where p < .05, after threshold-free cluster enhancement (TFCE) and correction for the family-wise error rate (FWE), are shown. Analyses were not corrected for multiple comparisons across white matter microstructure parameters.
Associations between white matter microstructure and language in very preterm and term-born children.
| Semantic performance | Grammar performance | Phonological awareness | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA | AD | RD | MD | Density | FA | AD | RD | MD | Density | FA | AD | RD | MD | Density | |
| Direction of correlation | pos. | neg. | neg. | neg. | pos. | pos. | neg. | neg. | neg. | N/A | pos. | neg. | neg. | neg. | N/A |
| Total number of voxels (% skeleton) | 15,945 (8.2) | 9941 (5.1) | 52,553 (27) | 47,059 (24.2) | 43,264 (22.2) | 30,191 (15.5) | 18,293 (9.4) | 49,890 (25.6) | 39,272 (20.2) | N/A | 47,662 (24.5) | 25,953 (13.3) | 67,636 (34.7) | 72,686 (37.3) | N/A |
| Cerebellar peduncle superior | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓R | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Cerebellar peduncle middle | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Cerebellar peduncle inferior | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Pontine crossing tract | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||||||||
| Corpus callosum (genu, body, splenium) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Fornix (column, body, cres/Stria terminalis) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Corticospinal tract | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓R | ✓ | ✓R | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Medial lemniscus | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓R | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Cerebral peduncule | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||||||||
| Internal capsule (anterior, posterior, retrolenticular) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Corona radiata (anterior, superior, posterior) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Thalamic radiation (anterior, posterior) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ L | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Sagittal stratum | ✓ | ✓L | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| External capsule | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Cingulum (cingulate gyrus, hippocampus) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓HC | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Forceps (major, minor) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Longitudinal fasciculus superior | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Longitudinal fasciculus inferior | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
| Fronto-occipital fasciculus superior | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓R | ✓ | ✓R | ✓ | ✓ R | |||||
| Fronto-occipital fasciculus inferior | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| Uncinate fasciculus | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| Tapetum | ✓R | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓R | ✓ R | ✓ R | |||||
Note. FA, fractional anisotropy AD, Axial diffusivity, RD, radial diffusivity, MD, mean diffusivity. Tick mark implies evidence of an association (p < .05, family wise error rate corrected) between the microstructural parameter within that region and language. Associations were identified in both the left (L) and right (R) hemispheres of the brain unless otherwise stated. HC = evidence of an association was found in the hippocampal part of the cingulum only. The axon dispersion parameter was not included in this table because there was no evidence of associations between axon dispersion and language. N/A there was no association between this parameter and language at p < .05, family-wise error rate corrected).
Fig. 2Regions where there is evidence (p < .05, family wise error rate corrected) of A. associations between white matter microstructure parameters and language when assessed in all children, corrected for age, sex, language spoken at home and parental education and B. associations between white matter microstructure parameters and language in children without major brain pathologies, very low IQ and lowest possible language score. P-values in red-yellow = positive correlations and dark to light blue = negative associations. P-value maps have been overlaid on the standard space (MNI152) T1-weighted image. Note, no image is shown when no voxels were identified at p < .05 family wise error rate-corrected. Analyses were not corrected for multiple comparisons across white matter microstructure parameters.
Fig. 3Regions where there is evidence (p < .05, family wise error rate corrected) of associations between white matter microstructure parameters and grammar performance when assessed in all children. P-values in red-yellow = positive correlations and dark to light blue = negative associations. P-value maps have been overlaid on the standard space (MNI152) T1-weighted image. The scatter plots show the average diffusion value (y-axis) from the significant regions for each participant against grammar performance (x-axis) for each participant (VPT in white and term-born children in green). Only associations, where p < .05, after threshold-free cluster enhancement (TFCE) and correction for the family-wise error rate (FWE), are shown. Analyses were not corrected for multiple comparisons across white matter microstructure parameters.
Fig. 4Regions where there is evidence (p < .05, family wise error rate corrected) of associations between white matter microstructure parameters and phonological awareness when assessed in all children. P-values in red-yellow = positive correlations and dark to light blue = negative associations. P-value maps have been overlaid on the standard space (MNI152) T1-weighted image. The scatter plots show the average diffusion value (y-axis) from the significant regions for each participant against phonologic performance (x-axis) for each participant (VPT in white and term-born children in green). Only associations, where p < .05, after threshold-free cluster enhancement (TFCE) and correction for the family-wise error rate (FWE), are shown. Analyses were not corrected for multiple comparisons across white matter microstructure parameters.
Associations between the arcuate fasciculus white matter microstructure and language.
| Language function | White matter parameter | Hemisphere | Whole group association | Adjusted whole group associationa | Adjusted | Adjusted whole group associationb | Adjusted | Adjusted whole group associationc | Adjusted | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate (95% CI) | Estimate (95% CI) | Estimate (95% CI) | Estimate (95% CI) | |||||||
| Semantics | FA | L | 144.4 (−25.9, 314.7) | 0.10 | 127.5 (−46.7, 301.7) | 0.15 | 116.9 (−57.1, 290.9) | 0.19 | 144.2 (−26.3, 314.6) | 0.10 |
| FA | R | 165.2 (26.8, 303.6) | 0.019 | 157.0 (8.1, 305.9) | 0.039 | 153.1 (3.2, 303.0) | 0.045 | 163.4 (23.8, 303.0) | 0.022 | |
| AD | L | 1.5 (−65.2, 68.1) | 0.97 | −14.71 (−89.8, 60.3) | 0.70 | −13.0 (−89.0, 63.0) | 0.74 | 1.4 (−64.7, 67.6) | 0.97 | |
| AD | R | 17.5 (−61.5, 96.5) | 0.66 | 2.9 (−80.5, 86.4) | 0.95 | −5.2 (−90.4, 79.9) | 0.90 | 16.6 (−62.6, 95.8) | 0.68 | |
| RD | L | −86.5 (−200.4, 27.5) | 0.14 | −83.2 (−204.0, 37.5) | 0.18 | −76.6 (−195.5, 42.4) | 0.21 | −86.1 (−199.8, 27.6) | 0.14 | |
| RD | R | −95.6 (−212.1, 21.0) | 0.11 | −98.4 (−221.7, 25.0) | 0.12 | −100.6 (−220.6, 19.4) | 0.10 | −94.5 (−210.8, 21.9) | 0.11 | |
| MD | L | −69.9 (−180.3, 40.6) | 0.22 | −73.4 (−192.7, 45.8) | 0.23 | −67.8 (−185.2, 49.6) | 0.26 | −69.4 (−179.4, 40.5) | 0.22 | |
| MD | R | −65.5 (−187.4, 56.4) | 0.29 | −72.5, (−199.7, 54.7) | 0.26 | −77.8 (−201.6, 46.0) | 0.22 | −65.0 (−186.6, 56.6) | 0.30 | |
| Axon Density | L | 84.2 (−14.4, 182.7) | 0.09 | 77.7 (−16.6, 172.1) | 0.11 | 74.9 (−19.9, 169.7) | 0.12 | 84.5 (−14.1, 183.1) | 0.09 | |
| Axon Density | R | 71.0 (−8.54, 150.5) | 0.08 | 62.1 (−15.9, 140.0) | 0.12 | 60.2 (−21.4, 141.8) | 0.15 | 70.5 (−9.1, 150.1) | 0.08 | |
| Axon Dispersion | L | −163.4 (−323.2, −3.7) | 0.045 | −121.4 (−278.8, 36.1) | 0.13 | −91.9 (−257.7, 73.9) | 0.28 | −165.2 (−326.6, −3.8) | 0.045 | |
| Axon Dispersion | R | −257.8 (−417.1, −98.5) | 0.002 | −230.8 (−395.1, −66.5) | 0.006 | −195.9 (−377.2, −14.7) | 0.034 | −258.9 (−418.4, −99.3) | 0.001 | |
| Grammar | FA | L | 196.3 (−26.4, 418.9) | 0.08 | 165.7 (−35.4, 366.9) | 0.11 | 157.8 (−47.7, 363.3) | 0.13 | 195.2 (−29.0, 419.3) | 0.09 |
| FA | R | 134.9 (−93.5, 363.4) | 0.25 | 116.4 (−96.7, 329.4) | 0.28 | 112.7 (−105.1, 330.6) | 0.31 | 138.7 (−96.3, 373.7) | 0.25 | |
| AD | L | 72.5 (−50.6, 195.6) | 0.25 | 63.5 (−37.7, 164.6) | 0.22 | 64.7 (−41.4, 170.7) | 0.23 | 75.8 (−45.0, 196.7) | 0.22 | |
| AD | R | 62.2 (−63.9, 188.3) | 0.33 | 54.3 (−48.4, 156.9) | 0.30 | 47.6 (59.8, 154.9) | 0.39 | 67.6 (−60.6, 195.8) | 0.30 | |
| RD | L | −79.9 (−255.0, 95.0) | 0.37 | −59.5 (−217.4, 98.3) | 0.46 | −55.1 (−215.6, 105.3) | 0.50 | −76.1 (−252.8, 100.5) | 0.40 | |
| RD | R | −51.2 (−242.1, 139.7) | 0.60 | −42.3 (−211.4, 126.8) | 0.62 | −43.9 (−213.7, 125.9) | 0.61 | −48.6 (−243.7, 146.4) | 0.63 | |
| MD | L | −34.6 (−227.1, 157.9) | 0.73 | −19.9 (−187.2, 147.4) | 0.82 | −16.0 (−186.5, 154.5) | 0.85 | −29.3 (−222.1, 163.6) | 0.77 | |
| MD | R | −12.3 (−217.5, 192.9) | 0.91 | −7.8 (−182.0, 166.4) | 0.93 | −11.8 (−187.5, 163.8) | 0.90 | −8.0 (−216.3, 200.2) | 0.94 | |
| Axon Density | L | 27.9 (−152.1, 207.9) | 0.76 | 14.1 (−153.7, 181.9) | 0.87 | 10.6 (−160.9, 182.1) | 0.90 | 24.8 (−156.2, 205.8) | 0.79 | |
| Axon Density | R | 28.7 (−114.8, 172.1) | 0.70 | 11.0 (−121.8, 143.9) | 0.87 | 9.4 (−128.5, 147.3) | 0.89 | 26.2 (−119.5, 171.9) | 0.73 | |
| Axon Dispersion | L | −294.5 (−529.6, −59.4) | 0.014 | −251.1 (−460.7, −41.5) | 0.019 | −230.5 (−449.3, −11.7) | 0.039 | −305.8 (−546.9, −64.8) | 0.013 | |
| Axon Dispersion | R | −329.3 (−580.3, −78.3) | 0.010 | −229.5 (−528.3, −70.6) | 0.010 | −274.5 (−513.8, −35.2) | 0.025 | −352.1 (−615.2, −89.1) | 0.009 | |
| Phonological awareness | FA | L | 28.4 (−11.3, 68.0) | 0.16 | 26.2 (−12.6, 64.9) | 0.19 | 22.1 (−17.2, 61.3) | 0.27 | 28.6 (−10.9, 68.2) | 0.15 |
| FA | R | −5.5 (−54.7, 43.7) | 0.83 | −7.1 (−55.7, 41.5) | 0.77 | −9.6 (−59.9, 40.8) | 0.71 | −3.0 (−50.5, 44.5) | 0.90 | |
| AD | L | 14.2 (−15.1, 43.5) | 0.34 | 8.1 (−20.9, 37.2) | 0.58 | 9.1 (−16.9, 35.2) | 0.49 | 13.5 (−15.7, 42.7) | 0.36 | |
| AD | R | 3.7 (−27.6, 34.9) | 0.82 | −0.2 (−30.7, 30.3) | 0.99 | −2.9 (−34.1, 28.2) | 0.85 | 4.2 (−26.8, 35.2) | 0.79 | |
| RD | L | −10.5 (−39.8, 18.8) | 0.48 | −11.7 (−41.6, 18.1) | 0.44 | −9.2 (−38.0, 19.7) | 0.53 | −10.8 (−40.0, 18.4) | 0.47 | |
| RD | R | 3.5 (−28.0, 35.0) | 0.83 | 1.39 (−29.9, 32.7) | 0.93 | 1.3 (−29.5, 32.1) | 0.93 | 2.2 (−28.5, 32.9) | 0.89 | |
| MD | L | −2.7 (−33.3, 28.0) | 0.86 | −6.2 (−37.7, 25.3) | 0.70 | −3.8 (−33.4, 25.8) | 0.80 | −3.2 (−33.6, 27.3) | 0.84 | |
| MD | R | 4.5 (−30.0, 38.9) | 0.80 | 1.2 (−32.8, 35.2) | 0.95 | 0.0 (−33.1, 33.1) | 0.99 | 3.7 (−30.1, 37.6) | 0.83 | |
| Axon Density | L | −5.9 (−39.2, 27.4) | 0.73 | −6.8 (−40.0, 26.5) | 0.69 | −7.8 (−40.2, 24.7) | 0.64 | −5.9 (−39.2, 27.3) | 0.73 | |
| Axon Density | R | −11.2 (−39.0, 16.5) | 0.43 | −13.0 (−40.5, 14.5) | 0.36 | −14.0 (−39.8, 11.8) | 0.29 | −10.4 (−38.1, 17.2) | 0.46 | |
| Axon Dispersion | L | −41.5 (−91.1, 8.2) | 0.10 | −31.7 (−79.4, 16.0) | 0.19 | −21.5 (−73.1, 30.0) | 0.41 | −41.6 (−90.4, 7.2) | 0.10 | |
| Axon Dispersion | R | −30.5 (−95.7, 34.7) | 0.36 | −23.9 (−84.8, 36.9) | 0.44 | −9.8 (−78.5, 58.9) | 0.78 | −33.0 (−96.5, 30.4) | 0.31 |
Note. Estimates of regression coefficients from separate linear regression models for each predictor-outcome combination for the left and right hemisphere. CI = confidence interval, FA = Fractional anisotropy, AD = axial diffusivity, RD = radial diffusivity, MD = mean diffusivity, L = left hemisphere, R = right hemisphere, VPT = very preterm. a Analyses adjusted for age, sex, language spoken at home, parental education. b Analyses adjusted for age, sex, language spoken at home, parental education and head motion. c Analyses excluding children with low IQ, imputed language score, and major brain injuries.