| Literature DB >> 33035964 |
Sarah E Dubner1, Jessica Rose2, Lisa Bruckert3, Heidi M Feldman3, Katherine E Travis3.
Abstract
AIM: To determine whether variability in diffusion MRI (dMRI) white matter tract metrics, obtained in a cohort of preterm infants prior to neonatal hospital discharge, would be associated with language outcomes at age 2 years, after consideration of age at scan and number of major neonatal complications.Entities:
Keywords: Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Infant; Language; Premature; Tractography; White matter
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33035964 PMCID: PMC7554644 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102446
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Fig. 1Tractography of selected white matter tracts. Left hemisphere tract renderings are displayed on a mid- sagittal T1 image from a representative participant. Right hemisphere tract renderings not shown. A) The arcuate fasciculus is shown in red, B) the inferior longitudinal fasciculus is shown in orange, C) the uncinate fasciculus is shown in blue. D) Occipital segment of the corpus callosum rendering is displayed in green on an axial T1 image from the same participant. Dashed lines represent the location of the regions of interest (ROIs) used to segment each pathway from the whole-brain tractogram. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Participant characteristics (n = 30).
| Participant Demographics | Mean (sd) | min - max |
|---|---|---|
| Gestational Age, weeks | 28.9 (2.3) | 24.9 – 32.9 |
| Birthweight, grams | 1085 (281) | 520 – 1510 |
| Post Menstrual Age at Scan, weeks | 36.3 (1.4) | 34.7 – 40.3 |
| Chronological Age at Bayley, months | 22.2 (1.7) | 20.6 – 29.4 |
| Adjusted Age at Bayley, months | 19.5 (1.9) | 18.1 – 27.3 |
| Maternal Age, years | 33.2 (6.5) | 13 – 47 |
| Race | ||
| Caucasian/White | 20 (66.7) | |
| Asian/Pacific Islander | 4 (13.3) | |
| Black/African American | 3 (10) | |
| Other/Unknown | 3 (10) | |
| Ethnicity | ||
| Hispanic | 9 (30) | |
| Non-Hispanic | 21 (70) | |
| Parent Language preference, n (%) | ||
| English | 24 (80) | |
| Spanish | 6 (20) | |
| Male, n (%) | 11 (36.7) | |
| Intraventricular Hemorrhage | 6 (20.0) | |
| Clinical MRI Findings | ||
| No Abnormality | 16 (53.3) | |
| Minimal Abnormality | 14 (46.7) | |
| Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia | 5 (16.7) | |
| Sepsis | 1 (3.3) | |
| Necrotizing Enterocolitis | 1 (3.3) | |
| Patent Ductus Arteriosus | 14 (46.7) | |
| Retinopathy of Prematurity | 11 (36.7) | |
| Stage 1 | 7 (23.3) | |
| Stage 2 | 3 (10.0) | |
| Stage 3 | 1 (3.3) | |
| Hyperbilirubinemia | 27 (90) | |
| Number of Medical Risk Factorsb | ||
| 0 | 10 (33.3) | |
| 1 | 9 (30.0) | |
| 2 | 4 (13.3) | |
| 3 | 7 (23.3) | |
| Composite Language | 83.9 (16.8) | |
| Expressive Scaled Score | 7.6 (3.1) | |
| Receptive Scaled Score | 7.5 (3.4) | |
| Composite Cognitive | 95.5 (14.5) | |
| Composite Motor | 93.5 (9.1) | |
n = 27. Age at developmental testing was missing for 3 participants. b Medical Risk Factors include intraventricular hemorrhage, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, patent ductus arteriosus, retinopathy of prematurity. All intraventricular hemorrhage was grade I.
Tract mean FA and MD.
| Tract | n | FA mean (SD) | MD mean (SD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ILF-L | 24 | 0.19 (0.02) | 1.57 (0.09) |
| ILF-R | 22 | 0.18 (0.02) | 1.51 (0.07) |
| UF-L | 30 | 0.19 (0.02) | 1.40 (0.06) |
| UF-R | 30 | 0.20 (0.02) | 1.39 (0.05) |
| CC-Occ | 28 | 0.33 (0.04) | 1.56 (0.08) |
FA = Fractional Anisotropy, MD = Mean Diffusivity (10−3 mm2/s). ILF = inferior longitudinal fasciculus, UF = uncinate fasciculus, CC-Occ = occipital segment of the corpus callosum. L = Left, R = Right.
Prediction of BSID-III composite language score at age 2 years from mean tract-FA of A. left inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF-L), B. right inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF-R), C. left uncinate fasciculus (UF-L), D. right uncinate fasciculus (UF-R), and E. Corpus Callosum Occipital segment (CC-Occ), beyond covariates of post menstrual age at scan (PMA Scan) and neonatal medical complications (MedRisk).
| A. | Model 1A (n = 24) | Model 1B | Model 1C |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.64 (0.12, 1.17) | 0.31 (−0.24, 0.87) | 0.23 (−0.46, 0.92) | |
| −0.53 (−1.05, −0.01) | −0.65 (−1.13, −0.16) | −1.42 (−5.31, 2.48) | |
| 0.58 (0.08, 1.09) | 0.49 (−0.21, 1.19) | ||
| 0.89 (−3.56, 5.34) | |||
| 0.01 (p = 0.68) | |||
| 0.25 (−0.01, 0.51) (p = 0.05) | |||
| 0.18 | |||
| B. | Model 2A (n = 22) | Model 2B | Model 2C |
| 0.20 (−0.33, 0.72) | 0.10 (−0.75, 0.95) | 0.08 (−0.86, 1.01) | |
| −0.13 (−0.66, 0.39) | −0.17 (−0.78, 0.43) | −0.61 (−6.28, 5.07) | |
| 0.14 (−0.81, 1.09) | 0.08 (−1.12, 1.29) | ||
| 0.48 (−5.78, 6.75) | |||
| 0.01 (p = 0.76) | 0.001 (p = 0.87) | ||
| 0.03 (−0.09, 0.15) (p = 0.73) | 0.04 (−0.09, 0.17) (p = 0.87) | 0.04 (−0.09, 0.17) (p = 0.95) | |
| −0.07 | −0.12 | −0.19 | |
| 0.04 (−0.37, 0.45) | 0.15 (−0.29, 0.58) | 0.14 (−0.30, 0.57) | |
| −0.03 (−0.45, 0.38) | −0.07 (−0.48, 0.34) | −2.09 (−6.05, 1.86) | |
| −0.29 (−0.70, 0.12) | −0.54 (−1.19, 0.10) | ||
| 2.05 (−1.93, 6.03) | |||
| 0.07 (p = 0.16) | 0.04 (p = 0.30) | ||
| 0.002(−0.03,0.03) (p = 0.97) | 0.08 (−0.08, 0.24) (p = 0.56) | 0.12 (−0.06, 0.30) (p = 0.53) | |
| −0.07 | −0.03 | −0.03 | |
| 0.04 (−0.37, 0.45) | 0.10 (−0.31, 0.51) | 0.10 (−0.32, 0.52) | |
| −0.03 (−0.45, 0.38) | 0.04 (−0.38, 0.45) | −0.57 (−4.63, 3.49) | |
| −0.31 (−0.72, 0.10) | −0.37 (−0.93, 0.19) | ||
| 0.62 (−3.54, 4.79) | |||
| 0.09 (p = 0.13) | 0.003 (p = 0.76) | ||
| 0.002(−0.03,0.03) (p = 0.97) | 0.09 (−0.08, 0.26) (p = 0.48) | 0.09 (−0.07, 0.25) (p = 0.64) | |
| −0.07 | −0.02 | −0.05 | |
| 0.05 (−0.38, 0.48) | 0.10 (−0.29, 0.50) | 0.02 (−0.35, 0.40) | |
| −0.11 (−0.54, 0.32) | −0.18 (−0.57, 0.22) | 3.49 (−0.02, 7.00) | |
| −0.45 (−0.83, −0.07) | 0.15 (−0.52, 0.83) | ||
| −3.65 (−7.12, −0.17) | |||
| 0.01 (−0.06, 0.08) (p = 0.86) | 0.21 (−0.02, 0.44) (p = 0.13) | ||
| −0.07 | 0.11 |
Data are standardized coefficients (95% Confidence Interval). R2 change (Δ R2) values in model B are in reference to model A. Δ R2 values in model C reflect the increase in variance accounted for by the interaction term in relation to the preceding model with the main effect for that tract. MedRisk is a composite variable from 0 to 2 where 0 = none, 1 = 1 or 2, and 2 = 3 or more of the following medical risk factors: necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, patent ductus arteriosus, retinopathy of prematurity, and culture proven sepsis.
Fig. 2Associations of FA from infant scans obtained prior to NICU discharge and Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 3rd Edition Composite Language Scores, obtained at 18–27 months corrected age. Correlations are visualized as scatter plots between mean FA values and composite language values. Predicted model, which is adjusted for post menstrual age at scan, is visualized as regression lines for each MedRisk level. Children with zero medical risk factors are represented with open circles and dashed lines, children with one or two medical risk factors are represented with closed gray circles and solid gray lines, and children with three or more medical risk factors are represented with closed black circles and solid black lines. A) In the left inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF-L) the degree of association of ILF-L FA and language was the same regardless of the number of medical complications. B) In the occipital segment of the corpus callosum (CC-Occ), medical complications moderated the association of FA and composite language score. A relation between CC-Occ FA and language at age 2 was found in the participants with 1 or 2 and with 3 or more medical risk factors.