Literature DB >> 30268324

Morphological processing in the brain: The good (inflection), the bad (derivation) and the ugly (compounding).

Alina Leminen1, Eva Smolka2, Jon A Duñabeitia3, Christos Pliatsikas4.   

Abstract

There is considerable behavioral evidence that morphologically complex words such as 'tax-able' and 'kiss-es' are processed and represented combinatorially. In other words, they are decomposed into their constituents 'tax' and '-able' during comprehension (reading or listening), and producing them might also involve on-the-spot combination of these constituents (especially for inflections). However, despite increasing amount of neurocognitive research, the neural mechanisms underlying these processes are still not fully understood. The purpose of this critical review is to offer a comprehensive overview on the state-of-the-art of the research on the neural mechanisms of morphological processing. In order to take into account all types of complex words, we include findings on inflected, derived, and compound words presented both visually and aurally. More specifically, we cover a wide range of electro- and magnetoencephalography (EEG and MEG, respectively) as well as structural/functional magnetic resonance imaging (s/fMRI) studies that focus on morphological processing. We present the findings with respect to the temporal course and localization of morphologically complex word processing. We summarize the observed findings, their interpretations with respect to current psycholinguistic models, and discuss methodological approaches as well as their possible limitations.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compounding; Derivation; Inflection; Morphology; Neuroimaging

Year:  2018        PMID: 30268324     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  14 in total

1.  How the brain composes morphemes into meaning.

Authors:  Laura Gwilliams
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  African American English speaking 2nd graders, verbal-s, and educational achievement: Event related potential and math study findings.

Authors:  J Michael Terry; Erik R Thomas; Sandra C Jackson; Masako Hirotani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Morphological processing in Chinese engages left temporal regions.

Authors:  Ka I Ip; Rebecca A Marks; Lucy Shih-Ju Hsu; Nikita Desai; Ji Ling Kuan; Twila Tardif; Loulia Kovelman
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  What Language Disorders Reveal About the Mechanisms of Morphological Processing.

Authors:  Christina Manouilidou; Michaela Nerantzini; Brianne M Chiappetta; M Marsel Mesulam; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-11-29

5.  Distinct orthography boosts morphophonological discrimination: Vowel raising in Bengali verb inflections.

Authors:  Nadja Althaus; Sandra Kotzor; Swetlana Schuster; Aditi Lahiri
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2022-02-23

6.  Origins of Dissociations in the English Past Tense: A Synthetic Brain Imaging Model.

Authors:  Gert Westermann; Samuel Jones
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-02

7.  Modularity and granularity across the language network-A primary progressive aphasia perspective.

Authors:  M-Marsel Mesulam; Christina A Coventry; Benjamin M Rader; Alan Kuang; Jaiashre Sridhar; Adam Martersteck; Hui Zhang; Cynthia K Thompson; Sandra Weintraub; Emily J Rogalski
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.644

8.  Morphological and Whole-Word Semantic Processing Are Distinct: Event Related Potentials Evidence From Spoken Word Recognition in Chinese.

Authors:  Lijuan Zou; Jerome L Packard; Zhichao Xia; Youyi Liu; Hua Shu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Electrophysiological correlates of concept type shifts.

Authors:  Natalia Bekemeier; Dorothea Brenner; Anne Klepp; Katja Biermann-Ruben; Peter Indefrey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Verbal Working Memory as Emergent from Language Comprehension and Production.

Authors:  Steven C Schwering; Maryellen C MacDonald
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.