Literature DB >> 30267718

PCR-based quantification of taxa-specific abundances in microbial communities: Quantifying and avoiding common pitfalls.

Fabian Bonk1, Denny Popp2, Hauke Harms1, Florian Centler1.   

Abstract

The quantification of relative and absolute taxa-specific abundances in complex microbial communities is crucial for understanding and modeling natural and engineered ecosystems. Many errors inherent to this quantification are, though well-known, still insufficiently addressed and can potentially lead to a completely different interpretation of experimental results. This review provides a critical assessment of next generation sequencing (NGS) of amplicons and quantitative real-time PCR for the quantification of relative and absolute taxa-specific genome abundances. Starting from DNA extraction, the following error sources were considered: DNA extraction efficiency, PCR-associated bias, variance of strain-specific 16S rRNA operon copy number per genome, and analysis of quantitative real-time PCR and NGS data. Tools and methods for estimating and minimizing these errors are presented and demonstrated on published data. In conclusion, amplicon sequencing and qPCR of 16S rRNA genes are valuable tools to determine relative and absolute taxa-specific genome abundances, but results can deviate by several orders of magnitudes from the true values if the reviewed error sources are ignored. Many of these errors can be minimized in a cost-efficient manner and large errors can be easily identified by plausibility checks as shown in this review. Finally, the accurate conversion of genome abundances to cell numbers and microbial biomasses was pointed out as an important future research topic for the integration of PCR-based abundances into mathematical models.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing; 16S rRNA gene copy number variation; Absolute abundance quantification; Biomass quantification; Ploidy; Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30267718     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2018.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  19 in total

Review 1.  Skin Microbiota and the Cosmetic Industry.

Authors:  Maria João Carvalho; Ana L S Oliveira; Sílvia Santos Pedrosa; Manuela Pintado; Inês Pinto-Ribeiro; Ana Raquel Madureira
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Fungal and ciliate protozoa are the main rumen microbes associated with methane emissions in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Adrián López-García; Alejandro Saborío-Montero; Mónica Gutiérrez-Rivas; Raquel Atxaerandio; Idoia Goiri; Aser García-Rodríguez; Jose A Jiménez-Montero; Carmen González; Javier Tamames; Fernando Puente-Sánchez; Magdalena Serrano; Rafael Carrasco; Cristina Óvilo; Oscar González-Recio
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 6.524

Review 3.  Probiotic Strains and Intervention Total Doses for Modulating Obesity-Related Microbiota Dysbiosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ana López-Moreno; Antonio Suárez; Camila Avanzi; Mercedes Monteoliva-Sánchez; Margarita Aguilera
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  The genetic diversity and evolution of diatom-diazotroph associations highlights traits favoring symbiont integration.

Authors:  A Caputo; J A A Nylander; R A Foster
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 5.  The Impact of Female Genital Microbiota on Fertility and Assisted Reproductive Treatments.

Authors:  Pedro Brandão; Manuel Gonçalves-Henriques
Journal:  J Family Reprod Health       Date:  2020-09

6.  Austrian Raw-Milk Hard-Cheese Ripening Involves Successional Dynamics of Non-Inoculated Bacteria and Fungi.

Authors:  Narciso M Quijada; Stephan Schmitz-Esser; Benjamin Zwirzitz; Christian Guse; Cameron R Strachan; Martin Wagner; Stefanie U Wetzels; Evelyne Selberherr; Monika Dzieciol
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-12-11

7.  Microbial carrying capacity and carbon biomass of plastic marine debris.

Authors:  Shiye Zhao; Erik R Zettler; Linda A Amaral-Zettler; Tracy J Mincer
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  The effect of 2'-fucosyllactose on simulated infant gut microbiome and metabolites; a pilot study in comparison to GOS and lactose.

Authors:  Krista Salli; Heli Anglenius; Johanna Hirvonen; Ashley A Hibberd; Ilmari Ahonen; Markku T Saarinen; Kirsti Tiihonen; Johanna Maukonen; Arthur C Ouwehand
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Simultaneous profiling and cultivation of the skin microbiome of healthy young adult skin for the development of therapeutic agents.

Authors:  Amalia Sitti Khayyira; Aulia Elfa Rosdina; Marina Ika Irianti; Amarila Malik
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-04-20

10.  Quantitative PCR provides a simple and accessible method for quantitative microbiota profiling.

Authors:  Ching Jian; Panu Luukkonen; Hannele Yki-Järvinen; Anne Salonen; Katri Korpela
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.