Literature DB >> 30267619

Quantitative assessment of environmental impact of biologics manufacturing using process mass intensity analysis.

Sri R Madabhushi1, John Gavin2, Sen Xu1, Collette Cutler3, Rebecca Chmielowski3, William Rayfield3, Nihal Tugcu3, Hao Chen1.   

Abstract

Process mass intensity (PMI) is a benchmarking metric to evaluate the efficiency of a manufacturing process, which is indicative of the environmental impact of the process. Although this metric is commonly applied for small molecule manufacturing processes, it is less commonly applied to biologics. In this study, an Excel based tool developed by the ACS GCI Pharmaceutical Roundtable was used to calculate PMI of different manufacturing processes for a monoclonal antibody (mAb). For the upstream process, three different versions were compared: fed-batch, fed-batch with N-1 perfusion, and perfusion in the N-stage bioreactor. For each upstream process version, an appropriate downstream operational mode was evaluated from the following: a column chromatography process utilizing Protein A and anion exchange (AEX) resin, a Protein A column and an AEX membrane, and a three-column periodic counter-current (3C PCC) chromatography process for Protein A and an AEX membrane. The impact of these different process variations on PMI was evaluated. Of all the process inputs, water contributes about 92-94% of the overall PMI. Additionally, the upstream processes and the chromatography steps account for 32-47 and 34-54% of the overall PMI, respectively. Sensitivity analysis was performed to identify opportunities for further reducing PMI. These data indicate that a semicontinuous manufacturing process (perfusion, 3C PCC, and AEX membrane) is the most efficient process, resulting in a 23% reduction of PMI when compared with the fed batch and two-column chromatography process. Together, PMI can be used to guide the development of efficient and environmentally sustainable mAb manufacturing processes.
© 2018 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 34:1566-1573, 2018. © 2018 American Institute of Chemical Engineers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  environmental; mAb; manufacturing process; process mass intensity; sustainability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30267619     DOI: 10.1002/btpr.2702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Prog        ISSN: 1520-6033


  3 in total

1.  Moving to CoPACaPAnA: Implementation of a continuous protein A capture process for antibody applications within an end-to-end single-use GMP manufacturing downstream process.

Authors:  Ozan Ötes; Cathrin Bernhardt; Kevin Brandt; Hendrik Flato; Otmar Klingler; Katharina Landrock; Verena Lohr; Ralf Stähler; Florian Capito
Journal:  Biotechnol Rep (Amst)       Date:  2020-05-04

Review 2.  End-to-end collaboration to transform biopharmaceutical development and manufacturing.

Authors:  John Erickson; Jeffrey Baker; Shawn Barrett; Ciaran Brady; Mark Brower; Ruben Carbonell; Tim Charlebois; Jon Coffman; Lisa Connell-Crowley; Michael Coolbaugh; Eric Fallon; Eric Garr; Christopher Gillespie; Roger Hart; Allison Haug; Gregg Nyberg; Michael Phillips; David Pollard; Maen Qadan; Irina Ramos; Kelley Rogers; Gene Schaefer; Jason Walther; Kelvin Lee
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Continuous countercurrent chromatographic twin-column purification of oligonucleotides: The role of the displacement effect.

Authors:  Ismaele Fioretti; Thomas Müller-Späth; Richard Weldon; Sebastian Vogg; Massimo Morbidelli; Mattia Sponchioni
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.395

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.