| Literature DB >> 30267599 |
Zhenying Wu1, Nengfei Wang2, Hiroshi Hisano3,4, Yingping Cao1, Fengyan Wu3, Wenwen Liu1, Yan Bao1, Zeng-Yu Wang3, Chunxiang Fu1.
Abstract
Ferulate 5-hydroxylase (F5H) catalyses the hydroxylation of coniferyl alcohol and coniferaldehyde for the biosynthesis of syringyl (S) lignin in angiosperms. However, the coordinated effects of F5H with caffeic acid O-methyltransferase (COMT) on the metabolic flux towards S units are largely unknown. We concomitantly regulated F5H expression in COMT-down-regulated transgenic switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) lines and studied the coordination of F5H and COMT in lignin biosynthesis. Down-regulation of F5H in COMT-RNAi transgenic switchgrass plants further impeded S lignin biosynthesis and, consequently, increased guaiacyl (G) units and reduced 5-OH G units. Conversely, overexpression of F5H in COMT-RNAi transgenic plants reduced G units and increased 5-OH units, whereas the deficiency of S lignin biosynthesis was partially compensated or fully restored, depending on the extent of COMT down-regulation in switchgrass. Moreover, simultaneous regulation of F5H and COMT expression had different effects on cell wall digestibility of switchgrass without biomass loss. Our results indicate that up-regulation and down-regulation of F5H expression, respectively, have antagonistic and synergistic effects on the reduction in S lignin resulting from COMT suppression. The coordinated effects between lignin genes should be taken into account in future studies aimed at cell wall bioengineering.Entities:
Keywords: Panicum virgatum L.; caffeic acid O-methyltransferase; coordinated effects; ferulate 5-hydroxylase; lignin biosynthesis; switchgrass
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30267599 PMCID: PMC6419721 DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Biotechnol J ISSN: 1467-7644 Impact factor: 9.803
Figure 1Schematic of locations of ferulate 5‐hydroxylase (F5H) and caffeic acid O‐methyltransferase (COMT) in the lignin biosynthetic pathway.
Figure 2Molecular characterization of PvF5H. (a) Phylogenetic analysis of the three P450s (C4H, C3H and F5H) in the lignin biosynthetic pathway. A maximum likelihood tree was constructed in PhyML version 3.0 on the basis of multiple alignments of the deduced protein sequences from switchgrass, maize, sorghum, rice, Brachypodium distachyon, Arabidopsis thaliana, Medicago truncatula and Populus trichocarpa. Sequence data from this article can be found in Phytozome and/or Genbank under the following accession numbers: switchgrass Pavir.9NG241700.1 (PvF5H1a), Pavir.9KG138400.1 (PvF5H1b), Pavir.Fb01856.1 (PvC4H1), Pavir.5KG602000.1 (PvC4H2a), Pavir.5NG607400.1 (PvC4H2b), Pavir.3KG265800.1 (PvC3H1a), Pavir.5KG602000.1 (PvC3H2a), Pavir.5NG607400.1 (PvC3H2b); maize AC210173.4_FGT005 (F5H), GRMZM2G100158 (F5H), GRMZM2G139874 (C4H), GRMZM2G147245 (C4H), GRMZM2G010468 (C4H), GRMZM2G140817 (C3H), GRMZM2G138074 (C3H); sorghum Sobic.001G196300.1 (F5H); rice LOC_Os10g36848.1 (F5H), LOC_Os05g25640.1 (C4H), LOC_Os01g60450.1 (C4H), LOC_Os05g41440.1 (C3H), LOC_Os10g12080.1 (C3H); B. distachyon Bradi3g30590.1 (F5H); A. thaliana At4g36220 (AtF5H1), At5g04330 (AtF5H2), AT2G30490 (AtC4H), AT2G40890 (AtC3H); M. truncatula Medtr8g076290.1 (MtF5H), ABC59086.1 (MtC3H); and P. trichocarpa Potri.005G117500.1 (PtrCald5H1), Potri.007G016400.1(PtrCald5H2), Potri.013G157900.1 (PtrC4H), Potri.006G033300.1 (PtC3H). (b) Collinear relationships of F5H orthologs in genomes of switchgrass, maize and rice. A chromosomal region of PvF5H1a including 40‐kb flanking sequences were aligned with the corresponding orthologous sequences in maize (100 kb) and rice (40 kb). (c) Correlations between expression levels of F5H and in different tissues and organs of switchgrass. The representative probesets of F5H (AP13ITG56842_at) and (KanlowCTG00989_s_at) were retrieved from the switchgrass gene expression atlas. COMT, caffeic acid O‐methyltransferase.
Figure 3Characterization of F5HRi and F5HOE transgenic switchgrass plants. (a) Quantitative real‐time PCR analysis of F5H transcript abundances in the F5HRi transgenic lines. (b) S and G lignin monomer yield in the F5HRi transgenic lines. (c) 5‐OH G lignin monomer yield in the F5HRi transgenic lines. (d) Quantitative real‐time PCR analysis of F5H transcript abundance in the F5HOE transgenic lines. (e) S and G lignin monomer yield in the F5HOE transgenic lines. (f) 5‐OH G lignin monomer yield in the F5HOE transgenic lines. The control plants for TF5HRi and TF5HOE transgenic lines were generated with pANIC8D and pANIC6D empty vectors respectively. Stems at the R1 stage were collected. Switchgrass was used as the reference for normalization. CWR, cell wall residue. Values are mean ± SE (n = 3). Means with the different letter are significantly different (One‐way ANOVA, Duncan's test, P < 0.05).
Figure 4Characterization of transgenic switchgrass plants with F5H down‐regulation in the caffeic acid O‐methyltransferase (COMT)‐suppressing background. (a) Quantitative real‐time PCR analysis of and F5H transcript abundances in the COMTRi1‐F5HRi transgenic lines. (b) S and G lignin monomer yield in the COMTRi1‐F5HRi transgenic lines. (c) 5‐OH G lignin monomer yield in the COMTRi1‐F5HRi transgenic lines. The control plants were generated with the pANIC8D empty vector. Stems at the R1 stage were collected. Switchgrass was used as the reference for normalization. CWR, cell wall residue. Values are mean ± SE (n = 3). Means with the different letter are significantly different (One‐way ANOVA, Duncan's test, P < 0.05).
Figure 5Characterization of transgenic switchgrass plants with F5H overexpression in the caffeic acid O‐methyltransferase (COMT)‐suppressing background. (a) Quantitative real‐time PCR analysis of and F5H transcript abundances in the COMTRi1‐F5HOE transgenic lines. (b) S and G lignin monomer yield in the COMTRi1‐F5HOE transgenic lines. (c) 5‐OH G lignin monomer yield in the COMTRi1‐F5HOE transgenic lines. (d) Quantitative real‐time PCR analysis of and F5H transcript abundance in the COMTRi2‐F5HOE transgenic lines. (e) S and G lignin monomer yield in the COMTRi2‐F5HOE transgenic lines. (f) 5‐OH G lignin monomer yield in the COMTRi2‐F5HOE transgenic lines. The control plants were generated with the pANIC6D empty vector. COMTRi1: the COMT‐RNAi line with severe down‐regulation of COMT; COMTRi2: the COMT‐RNAi line with moderate down‐regulation of COMT. Stems at the R1 stage were collected. Switchgrass was used as the reference for normalization. CWR, cell wall residue. Values are mean ± SE (n = 3). Means with the different letter are significantly different (One‐way ANOVA, Duncan's test, P < 0.05).
Figure 6Cross sections of internodes from transgenic switchgrass plants. The control plants were generated with the pANIC empty vector. Stems at the R1 stage were collected and the different internodes were separated.
Effects of modification of COMT and F5H on biomass, cell wall digestibility and lignin content of transgenic switchgrass plants
| Dry matter biomass (g/plant) | Enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency (%) | Acetyl bromide lignin (mg/g CWR) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 21.7 ± 1.5a | 32.2 ± 0.9e | 234.6 ± 3.4c |
| COMTRi1 | 20.5 ± 3.9a | 40.7 ± 1.1c | 217.5 ± 1.6b |
| COMTRi2 | 23.5 ± 1.5a | 36.4 ± 0.4d | 230.1 ± 2.4c |
| F5HRi‐1 | 20.9 ± 2.2a | 33.4 ± 0.7ed | 224.8 ± 4.9c |
| F5HOE‐1 | 22.4 ± 2.1a | 32.5 ± 1.0ed | 240.5 ± 3.6c |
| COMTRi1_F5HRi‐1 | 21.3 ± 4.3a | 51.1 ± 0.9a | 195.8 ± 5.3a |
| COMTRi1_F5HRi‐2 | 20.3 ± 3.1a | 50.5 ± 0.8a | 188.8 ± 4.4a |
| COMTRi1_F5HRi‐3 | 18.8 ± 2.1a | 51.2 ± 1.4a | 187.2 ± 1.5a |
| COMTRi1_F5HOE‐1 | 23.1 ± 3.3a | 44.1 ± 1.3bc | 219.6 ± 1.9b |
| COMTRi1_F5HOE‐2 | 17.3 ± 3.6a | 45.4 ± 0.5b | 208.1 ± 0.7ab |
| COMTRi1_F5HOE‐3 | 19.5 ± 2.0a | 43.0 ± 1.9bc | 215.4 ± 1.9b |
| COMTRi2_F5HOE‐1 | 20.6 ± 2.9a | 30.8 ± 0.9e | 232.6 ± 4.3c |
| COMTRi2_F5HOE‐2 | 21.9 ± 1.6a | 31.9 ± 2.9e | 232.7 ± 1.0c |
| COMTRi2_F5HOE‐3 | 24.2 ± 3.8a | 32.1 ± 0.8e | 225.4 ± 3.7c |
The transgenic and control plants were harvested after six months of growth in the greenhouse. Values are mean ± SE (n = 3). Means with the same letter are not significantly different (One‐way ANOVA, Duncan's test, P < 0.05).