Literature DB >> 30267377

Effect of Age of Onset of Psoriasis on Clinical Outcomes with Systemic Treatment in the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR).

Sanminder Singh1, Robert E Kalb2, Elke M G J de Jong3, Neil H Shear4, Mark Lebwohl5, Wayne Langholff6, Lori Hopkins7, Bhaskar Srivastava7, April W Armstrong8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare therapeutic response among patients with early-onset psoriasis (EOP) and late-onset psoriasis (LOP) receiving adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, ustekinumab, or methotrexate in the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR).
METHODS: Patients were grouped by age of onset: EOP (age ≤ 40 years) or LOP (age > 40 years). Repeated-measures analysis with logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (AOR; adjusted for baseline characteristics) for achieving a Physician's Global Assessment score of cleared/minimal (PGA 0/1) or a percentage of body surface area involved with psoriasis < 3% (%BSA < 3) or %BSA < 1 for all patients; similar sensitivity analyses were performed for each treatment group.
RESULTS: Of 7511 patients, 5479 (72.9%) had EOP. The LOP group had a higher likelihood of achieving PGA 0/1 after treatment than did the EOP group in all patients (AOR 1.14 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.25]; p = 0.0019); the same was true in subgroups of etanercept-treated (AOR 1.38 [95% CI 1.14-1.66]; p = 0.0010) and methotrexate-treated (AOR 1.62 [95% CI 1.16-2.26]; p = 0.0049) patients. No significant difference was found between the EOP and LOP groups with regard to the likelihood of achieving %BSA < 3 or %BSA < 1 among all patients. However, LOP patients were more likely than EOP patients to achieve %BSA < 3 or %BSA < 1 in subgroups treated with infliximab (AOR 1.45 [95% CI 1.09-1.93; p = 0.0103] and AOR 1.36 [95% CI 1.03-1.78; p = 0.0290], respectively) and etanercept (AOR 1.30 [95% CI 1.06-1.61; p = 0.0123] and AOR 1.34 [95% CI 1.09-1.64; p = 0.0053], respectively).
CONCLUSION: Our real-world data from PSOLAR indicate that there are differences in some patient characteristics between EOP and LOP and that patients with EOP are less likely than those with LOP to respond to certain systemic treatments. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00508547).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30267377      PMCID: PMC6267545          DOI: 10.1007/s40257-018-0388-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol        ISSN: 1175-0561            Impact factor:   7.403


Key Points

Introduction

Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory skin condition that affects between 2 and 4% of the global population and varies widely between countries [1]. Psoriasis onset may occur at any age; however, some studies have demonstrated a bimodal distribution of age of onset in both male and female patients with psoriasis. One peak occurred at age 16 years for females and 22 years for males, with another peak at age 60 years for females and 57 years for males [2]. Two subtypes of psoriasis have been identified based on age of onset: early-onset psoriasis (EOP; age ≤ 40 years) and late-onset psoriasis (LOP; age > 40 years) [2]. The dichotomizing of psoriasis patients into early versus late onset of disease is consistent with differences in genetic predisposition and clinical presentation. Understanding the differences between these two subtypes of psoriasis is important because they appear to manifest with variable disease activity and may be associated with different patterns of disease. The landmark study by Henseler et al. [2] found that patients with EOP were more likely than those with LOP to experience frequent disease relapses (73 vs. 27%), extensive body surface involvement (75 vs. 25%), and nail involvement (74 vs. 26%). The authors also reported a higher prevalence of EOP versus LOP when stratified by sex (i.e., 74 vs. 26% for males and 66 vs. 34% for females) [2]. EOP and LOP are further characterized by differences in genetic susceptibility loci. For instance, EOP has been strongly associated with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-Cw6, HLA-B57, and HLA-DR7 alleles, whereas the HLA-Cw2 allele is overrepresented in LOP [2, 3]. Additionally, patients with EOP are more likely to have a positive family history and require systemic therapies than are those with LOP [4]. As the number of options for treating psoriasis continues to grow, there is increasing focus on how clinicians can provide patient-directed therapies to maximize treatment outcomes. One study found differences in response to etanercept between patients with EOP and those with LOP, but the study was limited by the number of treatments and sample size [5]. Real-world evidence of treatment outcomes in patients with EOP and LOP is lacking in the literature. The Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR) is a prospective, longitudinal, non-interventional, disease-based registry designed to collect clinical and safety outcome data from patients receiving systemic or biologic therapies through and up to 8 years [6, 7]. In this study, we used PSOLAR data to examine differences in treatment response between EOP and LOP following treatment with a biologic agent (i.e., adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, ustekinumab) or methotrexate.

Methods

Study Design and Patients

The design of PSOLAR has been reported previously [6, 7]. Briefly, patients had to be aged ≥ 18 years and must have had a diagnosis of psoriasis, for which they were receiving, or were eligible to receive, treatment with systemic therapies as prescribed by their physician per actual clinical practice. Data (e.g., demographic and patient characteristics, clinical and safety outcomes, and psoriasis treatment) are collected every 6 months. Enrollment in PSOLAR began on 20 June 2007, and the registry is fully enrolled (12,090 patients in 16 countries); the data included in this analysis were collected through 23 August 2015. Planned follow-up for each patient is 8 years from the time of registry enrollment.

Ethics

The registry (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00508547) is conducted in accordance with current US FDA regulations and guidelines, International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practices, the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and all other applicable national and local laws and regulations. The study protocol was approved by an institutional review board or ethics committee at all sites, and written informed consent was provided by all patients before study procedures were initiated.

Outcome Measures

Treatment outcomes were measured based on two standard assessments of psoriasis severity: Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) scores and percentage of body surface area involved with psoriasis (%BSA). The PGA evaluates the qualitative characteristics of psoriasis lesions (i.e., induration, scaling, and erythema), resulting in a total score ranging from clear (0) to severe (5).

Statistical Analyses

To be included in the analysis, patients had to have received systemic treatment with a biologic agent (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, or ustekinumab) or methotrexate within 6 months of enrollment in the registry. In addition, data regarding the age of psoriasis onset as well as baseline (pretreatment) PGA scores or %BSA must have been recorded within the 3 months before starting therapy. Patients were grouped by their age of onset: EOP (age ≤ 40 years) or LOP (age > 40 years). The proportions of patients achieving a PGA score of 0 or 1 (PGA 0/1) or a %BSA < 3 or %BSA < 1 were summarized for the EOP and LOP groups at four post-baseline visits (i.e., 6 months, 1 year, 1.5 years, and 2 years) for the overall population and for each treatment group (etanercept, adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab, or methotrexate). Repeated-measures analysis with logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for achieving PGA 0/1 and %BSA < 3 or %BSA < 1 for the overall population. Similar sensitivity analyses were performed for each treatment group. Beyond the age-of-onset group (EOP or LOP) variables, potential confounders in the modeled analyses included baseline PGA (0–1, 2–3, 4–5) or %BSA (0–3, > 3– < 10, ≥ 10), current treatment, post-baseline visit (6 months, 1 year, 1.5 years, 2 years), baseline body mass index, race, self-reported psoriatic arthritis, past or current smoking history, and past treatment with biologics (ustekinumab, adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab), oral systemic agents (including methotrexate), and phototherapy.

Results

Patient Disposition and Characteristics

Of the 12,090 patients enrolled in the registry, 7511 were eligible for inclusion in this analysis. The median duration of follow-up as of the data cut-off date for this analysis was 4.17 years (maximum 8.12 years). Patients with EOP accounted for 72.9% (5479/7511) of the total sample size (Table 1). Most patients in the study population were enrolled at sites located in North America (88.7%) (Table 1). Mean age was 44.8 years in the EOP group and 60.2 years in the LOP group. More than half of the patients in each group were male (57.7% [EOP] and 52.4% [LOP]), and most patients were White (84.3% [EOP] and 80.8% [LOP]). Most patients had a diagnosis of plaque psoriasis (98.0 and 95.9% for EOP and LOP, respectively); other diagnoses, which were not mutually exclusive, included guttate, erythrodermic, pustular, and/or inverse psoriasis. Baseline disease severity for the overall population was moderate in most patients, as measured by PGA (53.3% had a score of 2–3) and %BSA (mean ± standard deviation, 11.5 ± 17.1); more than one-third of patients (38.5%) had a self-reported history of psoriatic arthritis.
Table 1

Demographic and patient characteristics at enrollment by age of onset

EOPa (n = 5479)LOPb (n = 2032)All patients (n = 7511)
Treatmentc
 Adalimumab1479 (27.0)549 (27.0)2028 (27.0)
 Etanercept952 (17.4)415 (20.4)1367 (18.2)
 Infliximab648 (11.8)232 (11.4)880 (11.7)
 Ustekinumab2202 (40.2)622 (30.6)2824 (37.6)
 Methotrexate198 (3.6)214 (10.5)412 (5.5)
Age, years44.8 ± 12.360.2 ± 9.049.0 ± 13.4
Age (years) at enrollment
 Quartile 1 (18 to < 39)1877 (34.3)1877 (25.0)
 Quartile 2 (≥ 39 to < 50)1647 (30.1)231 (11.4)1878 (25.0)
 Quartile 3 (≥ 50 to < 59)1176 (21.5)702 (34.6)1878 (25.0)
 Quartile 4 (≥ 59)779 (14.2)1099 (54.1)1878 (25.0)
Sex, male3160 (57.7)1064 (52.4)4224 (56.2)
Race
 White4618 (84.3)1641 (80.8)6259 (83.3)
 Black or African American151 (2.8)105 (5.2)256 (3.4)
 Asian220 (4.0)80 (3.9)300 (4.0)
 Hispanic or Latino351 (6.4)154 (7.6)505 (6.7)
 Other139 (2.5)52 (2.6)191 (2.5)
Region
 North America4817 (87.9)1845 (90.8)6662 (88.7)
 Europe601 (11.0)154 (7.6)755 (10.1)
 South America61 (1.1)33 (1.6)94 (1.3)
Family history of psoriasis2602 (47.5)749 (36.9)3351 (44.6)
 Plaque5367 (98.0)1949 (95.9)7316 (97.4)
 Otherd438 (8.0)210 (10.3)648 (8.6)
 Guttate235 (4.3)58 (2.9)293 (3.9)
 Erythrodermic51 (0.9)31 (1.5)82 (1.1)
 Pustular55 (1.0)76 (3.7)131 (1.7)
 Inverse127 (2.3)60 (3.0)187 (2.5)
Psoriatic arthritis, self-reported2105 (38.4)789 (38.8)2894 (38.5)
PGA score
 0–12025 (37.0)746 (36.7)2771 (36.9)
 2–32923 (53.4)1083 (53.3)4006 (53.3)
 4–5531 (9.7)203 (10.0)734 (9.8)
Mean BSA,  % (median)11.5 ± 17.1 (5.0)11.5 ± 17.2 (5.0)11.5 ± 17.1 (5.0)
Mean duration of psoriasis, years (median)21.8 ± 13.0 (20.5)8.3 ± 7.2 (6.3)18.1 ± 13.1 (16.3)
Prior treatment
 Oral systemic agents1909 (34.8)596 (29.3)2505 (33.4)
 Phototherapy3374 (61.6)816 (40.2)4190 (55.8)
 Biologics4539 (82.8)1496 (73.6)6035 (80.3)

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number of patients (%) unless otherwise indicated

BSA body surface area, EOP early-onset psoriasis, LOP late-onset psoriasis, PGA Physician Global Assessment

aAge of onset ≤ 40 years

bAge of onset > 40 years

cFirst therapy on registry

dOther types of psoriasis were not mutually exclusive

Demographic and patient characteristics at enrollment by age of onset Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number of patients (%) unless otherwise indicated BSA body surface area, EOP early-onset psoriasis, LOP late-onset psoriasis, PGA Physician Global Assessment aAge of onset ≤ 40 years bAge of onset > 40 years cFirst therapy on registry dOther types of psoriasis were not mutually exclusive In general, disease characteristics were consistent across the EOP and LOP groups, with a few exceptions. As expected, mean disease duration was higher in the EOP than in the LOP groups (21.8 vs. 8.3 years). A higher proportion of EOP than LOP patients reported a family history of psoriasis (47.5 vs. 36.9%) and a history of use of oral systemic treatment (34.8 vs. 29.3%), phototherapy (61.6 vs. 40.2%), and biologic agents (82.8 vs. 73.6%) for psoriasis prior to registry enrollment. Overall, 37.6% of patients were exposed to ustekinumab, 11.7% to infliximab, 18.2% to etanercept, 27.0% to adalimumab, and 5.5% to methotrexate. Compared with the EOP group, fewer patients with LOP were exposed to ustekinumab (40.2 vs. 30.6%) and more patients with LOP were exposed to methotrexate (3.6 vs. 10.5%).

Clinical Outcomes

Physician’s Global Assessment

There were no differences in the proportions of patients achieving a PGA 0/1 response at 6 months, 1 year, 1.5 years, and 2 years between the EOP and LOP groups (Table 2). After adjusting for potential confounders, patients in the LOP group were more likely to have achieved a PGA 0/1 response than those in the EOP group (AOR 1.14 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05–1.25]; p = 0.0019). Consistent results were observed in the sensitivity analysis of patients treated with etanercept (AOR 1.38 [95% CI 1.14–1.66]; p = 0.0010) or methotrexate (AOR 1.62 [95% CI 1.16–2.26]; p = 0.0049). Modeled findings for adalimumab, infliximab, or ustekinumab showed no differences in the likelihood of patients achieving PGA 0/1 between the EOP and LOP groups (Table 2).
Table 2

Patients achieving PGA 0/1 at post-baseline visits based on age of onset

TreatmentProportion of patients achieving PGA 0/1Odds of achieving PGA 0/1for LOP vs. EOP
At 6 monthsAt 1 yearAt 1.5 yearsAt 2 years
EOPLOPEOPLOPEOPLOPEOPLOP
Overall270310092518928228281821457731.14 (1.05–1.25)
(56.2)(56.6)(56.6)(57.7)(56.7)56.8)(55.7)(57.7)p = 0.0019
Adalimumab7402666682506182235582081.09 (0.93–1.28)
(58.3)(55.3)(58.3)(59.0)(59.7)(59.6)(56.8)(58.4)p = 0.2755
Etanercept4322093961853571693201531.38 (1.14–1.66)
(52.5)(59.4)(52.3)(56.8)(52.3)(56.9)(49.7)(55.8)p = 0.0010
Infliximab332134312113288105274961.15 (0.90–1.46)
(59.0)(65.7)(58.4)(61.1)(59.8)(61.8)(59.8)(65.3)p = 0.2652
Ustekinumab113930910833129742619512530.99 (0.85–1.15)
(57.4)(55.5)(58.1)(60.0)(57.4)(56.7)(58.2)(58.4)p = 0.8910
Methotrexate59905867455941621.62 (1.16–2.26)
(35.1)(48.1)(38.9)(44.1)(36.0)(42.8)(31.8)(48.4)p = 0.0049

Data are presented as number of patients (%) or adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval)

EOP early-onset psoriasis, LOP late-onset psoriasis, PGA 0/1 Physician’s Global Assessment score of clear or minimal

Patients achieving PGA 0/1 at post-baseline visits based on age of onset Data are presented as number of patients (%) or adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) EOP early-onset psoriasis, LOP late-onset psoriasis, PGA 0/1 Physician’s Global Assessment score of clear or minimal

Percent Body Surface Area

The proportions of patients achieving %BSA < 3 or %BSA < 1 were similar for the EOP and LOP groups at 6 months, 1 year, 1.5 years, and 2 years (Tables 3 and 4). Based on AORs, no significant difference in the likelihood of achieving %BSA < 3 or %BSA < 1 was found between the EOP and LOP groups. However, sensitivity analyses showed that patients in the LOP group were more likely than those in the EOP group to achieve %BSA < 3 and %BSA < 1 when treated with infliximab or etanercept. The likelihood of LOP patients treated with infliximab achieving %BSA < 3 was 45% greater (AOR 1.45 [95% CI 1.09–1.93]; p = 0.0103) and the likelihood of achieving %BSA < 1 was 36% greater (AOR 1.36 [95% CI 1.03–1.78]; p = 0.0290) than that of EOP patients. For patients treated with etanercept, those in the LOP group were 30% more likely to achieve %BSA < 3 (AOR 1.30 [95% CI 1.06–1.61]; p = 0.0123) and 34% more likely to achieve %BSA < 1 (AOR 1.34 [95% CI 1.09–1.64]; p = 0.0053) than those in the EOP group. No difference was observed in the likelihood of achieving %BSA < 3 or %BSA < 1 for patients treated with ustekinumab, adalimumab, or methotrexate in the EOP and LOP groups (Tables 3 and 4).
Table 3

Patients achieving %BSA < 3 at post-baseline visits based on age of onset

TreatmentProportion of patients achieving %BSA < 3Odds of achieving %BSA < 3for LOP vs. EOP
At 6 monthsAt 1 yearAt 1.5 yearsAt 2 years
EOPLOPEOPLOPEOPLOPEOPLOP
Overall2857102627651030259192024928901.08 (0.98–1.18)
(59.4)(57.6)(62.2)(64.1)(64.4)(63.9)(64.7)(66.5)p = 0.1165
Adalimumab7722767342666812386692291.01 (0.85–1.20)
(60.8)(57.4)(64.1)(62.7)(65.8)63.6)(68.1)(64.3)p = 0.9006
Etanercept4442024222083811903701801.30 (1.06–1.61)
(54.0)(57.2)(55.8)(63.6)(55.8)(63.8)(57.5)(65.5)p = 0.0123
Infliximab3291343431293131223121101.45 (1.09–1.93)
(58.4)(65.7)(64.2)(69.7)(64.9)(71.8)(68.1)(74.8)p = 0.0103
Ustekinumab12413251203340115930010882940.88 (0.75–1.04)
(62.5)(58.4)(64.5)(65.4)(68.3)(65.2)(66.5)(67.9)p = 0.1343
Methotrexate71896387577053771.27 (0.87–1.84)
(42.3)(47.6)(42.3)(57.2)(45.6)(50.7)(41.1)(60.2)p = 0.2120

Data are presented as number of patients (%) or adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval)

BSA body surface area, EOP early-onset psoriasis, LOP late-onset psoriasis

Table 4

Patients achieving %BSA < 1 at post-baseline visits based on age of onset

TreatmentProportion of patients achieving %BSA < 1Odds of achieving %BSA < 1for LOP vs. EOP
At 6 monthsAt 1 yearAt 1.5 yearsAt 2 years
EOPLOPEOPLOPEOPLOPEOPLOP
Overall22388162209801199571319927231.09 (1.00–1.19)
(46.5)(45.8)(49.7)(49.8)(49.6)(49.5)(51.8)(54.0)p = 0.0582
Adalimumab6212195972125451835381901.01 (0.85–1.19)
(48.9)(45.5)(52.1)(50.0)(52.7)(48.9)(54.8)(53.4)p = 0.9379
Etanercept3191593241552821532811421.34 (1.09–1.64)
(38.8)(45.0)(42.8)(47.4)(41.3)(51.3)(43.6)(51.6)p = 0.0053
Infliximab27911027510324796257971.36 (1.03–1.78)
(49.6)(53.9)(51.5)(55.7)(51.2)(56.5)(56.1)(66.0)p = 0.0290
Ustekinumab9712579712738802298752390.93 (0.80–1.08)
(48.9)(46.1)(52.1)(52.5)(51.9)(49.8)(53.5)(55.2)p = 0.3490
Methotrexate48714258415241551.35 (0.92–1.97)
(28.6)(38.0)(28.2)(38.2)(32.8)(37.7)(31.8)(43.0)p = 0.1241

Data are presented as number of patients (%) or adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval)

BSA body surface area, EOP early-onset psoriasis, LOP late-onset psoriasis

Patients achieving %BSA < 3 at post-baseline visits based on age of onset Data are presented as number of patients (%) or adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) BSA body surface area, EOP early-onset psoriasis, LOP late-onset psoriasis Patients achieving %BSA < 1 at post-baseline visits based on age of onset Data are presented as number of patients (%) or adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) BSA body surface area, EOP early-onset psoriasis, LOP late-onset psoriasis

Discussion

Our findings are based on real-world data from 7511 patients with psoriasis who were treated with systemic therapies during enrollment in PSOLAR. Treatment outcomes were compared among EOP and LOP patients overall as well as among those treated with ustekinumab, adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, and methotrexate at four time points (6 months, 1 year, 1.5 years, and 2 years). In this analysis, nearly three-quarters of patients (72.9%) had EOP, which is consistent with previously reported prevalence data for EOP [2, 5]. Furthermore, our results indicate that age of onset of psoriasis may affect how patients respond to systemic therapies based on measures of achieving PGA 0/1, %BSA < 3, or %BSA < 1 responses. The proportions of treatment responders in the EOP and LOP groups were consistent across measures assessed at each of four time points; however, the multivariate model detected significant differences in response between EOP and LOP groups for some treatments. Across all treatments combined, there was a 14% greater likelihood of LOP patients achieving PGA 0/1 response; however, no differences were observed in the proportion of patients achieving %BSA < 3 or %BSA < 1 responses. In contrast, sensitivity analyses by treatment showed that, compared with the EOP group, LOP patients responded better to etanercept, infliximab, and methotrexate. Patients in the LOP group who were treated with etanercept were 38, 30, and 34% more likely than those in the EOP group to have responded when response was measured using PGA 0/1, %BSA < 3, and %BSA < 1, respectively. Similarly, infliximab-treated patients in the LOP group were 45% and 36% more likely than those in the EOP group to have achieved %BSA < 3 and %BSA < 1 responses, respectively; however, no difference was observed based on achieving PGA 0/1 response. Conversely, methotrexate-treated patients in the LOP group were 62% more likely to have achieved a PGA 0/1 response, but no difference was noted when assessed using %BSA parameters. Therefore, our results for adalimumab, ustekinumab, and etanercept are consistent across measures and support the notion that adalimumab and ustekinumab are better choices than etanercept for treating EOP patients. The heterogeneity in responses between endpoints for infliximab and methotrexate complicate the interpretation, but the results generally suggest that these agents might be less useful for EOP patients than for those with LOP. Response rates did not differ based on age of onset of psoriasis in patients treated with either ustekinumab or adalimumab. A possible explanation may be that patients who display different genetic susceptibility loci have variable treatment responses [8]. Studies evaluating response to biologics in psoriasis patients treated with ustekinumab and adalimumab have found variable responses among those carrying an HLA-Cw6 allele, which is associated with EOP, compared with those without this haplotype [9-13]. Other potential differences by age of onset, such as antidrug antibody development and treatment compliance patterns, may also have affected response rates across therapies. As expected based on published literature, patients with EOP had a significantly greater disease duration (21.8 vs. 8.3 years) and were more likely to have a positive family history of psoriasis (47.5 vs. 36.9%) than patients with LOP. Patients in the EOP group in this analysis were also more likely than those in the LOP group to have been treated previously with oral systemic agents (34.8 vs. 29.3%) and phototherapy (61.6 vs. 40.2%). Our findings are consistent with reports suggesting that, compared with patients with LOP, those with EOP may have an increased need for systemic therapies, given the greater disease severity and longer disease duration [14]. The findings of this analysis should be considered in the context of its limitations. The data used to draw these conclusions are derived from “real-world” clinical encounters that do not necessarily adhere to structured treatment protocols. Inherent to this limitation is the potential for treatment selection bias; however, the baseline disease severity for the two comparator groups (EOP vs. LOP) was not significantly different. Additionally, the statistical model may not account for all confounding variables.

Conclusion

Among the 7511 patients treated with biologics or methotrexate in PSOLAR, we found that age of onset may be associated with response to certain systemic treatments and may be useful for developing individualized treatments to maximize treatment response. Differences in responses between EOP and LOP patients was particularly evident for etanercept, infliximab, and methotrexate, suggesting those with LOP were more likely than those with EOP to experience a treatment response. However, the results suggested no difference in treatment outcomes in patients treated with ustekinumab or adalimumab.
Based on a review of over 7500 patients enrolled in the PSOLAR registry, some disease characteristics may differ between early-onset psoriasis and late-onset psoriasis (aged ≤ 40 years and > 40 years, respectively).
Results of modeled analyses adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics showed that response to certain biologic agents, such as infliximab and etanercept, is better in late-onset psoriasis than in early-onset psoriasis.
Age of onset may be an important consideration in developing individualized treatment regimens to maximize therapeutic response for patients with psoriasis.
  12 in total

1.  Pharmacogenetics of psoriasis: HLA-Cw6 but not LCE3B/3C deletion nor TNFAIP3 polymorphism predisposes to clinical response to interleukin 12/23 blocker ustekinumab.

Authors:  M Talamonti; E Botti; M Galluzzo; M Teoli; G Spallone; M Bavetta; S Chimenti; A Costanzo
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 9.302

2.  HLA-C*06:02 Allele and Response to IL-12/23 Inhibition: Results from the Ustekinumab Phase 3 Psoriasis Program.

Authors:  Katherine Li; C Chris Huang; Bruce Randazzo; Shu Li; Philippe Szapary; Mark Curran; Kim Campbell; Carrie Brodmerkel
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 8.551

3.  Psoriasis of early and late onset: characterization of two types of psoriasis vulgaris.

Authors:  T Henseler; E Christophers
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  Current therapeutic approaches of psoriasis are affected by age at disease onset.

Authors:  Vito Di Lernia; Elena Ficarelli
Journal:  J Dermatolog Treat       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 3.359

5.  Meta-analysis of the association between psoriasis and human leucocyte antigen-B.

Authors:  Y E Zhao; J X Ma; L Hu; S X Xiao; Y L Zhao
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 9.302

6.  Human leucocyte antigen-Cw6 as a predictor for clinical response to ustekinumab, an interleukin-12/23 blocker, in Chinese patients with psoriasis: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  H-Y Chiu; T-S Wang; C-C Chan; Y-P Cheng; S-J Lin; T-F Tsai
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 9.302

7.  The relationship between tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α promoter and IL12B/IL-23R genes polymorphisms and the efficacy of anti-TNF-α therapy in psoriasis: a case-control study.

Authors:  E Gallo; T Cabaleiro; M Román; G Solano-López; F Abad-Santos; A García-Díez; E Daudén
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 9.302

8.  PSOLAR: design, utility, and preliminary results of a prospective, international, disease-based registry of patients with psoriasis who are receiving, or are candidates for, conventional systemic treatments or biologic agents.

Authors:  Kim A Papp; Bruce Strober; Matthias Augustin; Steve Calabro; Anil Londhe; Marc Chevrier
Journal:  J Drugs Dermatol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.114

9.  Psoriasis of early and late onset: a clinical and epidemiologic study from Spain.

Authors:  Carlos Ferrándiz; Ramon M Pujol; Vicente García-Patos; Xavier Bordas; Joan A Smandía
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 10.  Global epidemiology of psoriasis: a systematic review of incidence and prevalence.

Authors:  Rosa Parisi; Deborah P M Symmons; Christopher E M Griffiths; Darren M Ashcroft
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 8.551

View more
  4 in total

1.  The Association Between Chronic Plaque Psoriasis and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Indian Patients: Results of a Pilot Study.

Authors:  Vikram K Mahajan; Narvir S Chauhan; Baldev S Rana; Karaninder S Mehta; Sheenam Hooda; Pushpinder S Chauhan; Amisha Kukreja
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2021-12-03

2.  The Association of Thyroid Dysfunction with Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Hospital-Based Retrospective Descriptive Observational Study.

Authors:  Ashwani Rana; Vikram K Mahajan; Pushpinder S Chauhan; Karaninder S Mehta; Satya Bhushan Sharma; Anuj Sharma; Reena Sharma
Journal:  Indian Dermatol Online J       Date:  2020-09-19

3.  Management of Paediatric Psoriasis by Paediatricians: A Questionnaire-Based Survey.

Authors:  Andreas Pinter; Nicole Mielke; Bartosz Malisiewicz; Roland Kaufmann; Anke König
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2020-05-18

4.  Intake of dietary fibre, red and processed meat and risk of late-onset Chronic Inflammatory Diseases: A prospective Danish study on the "diet, cancer and health" cohort.

Authors:  Katrine Hass Rubin; Nathalie Fogh Rasmussen; Inge Petersen; Tine Iskov Kopp; Egon Stenager; Melinda Magyari; Merete Lund Hetland; Anette Bygum; Bente Glintborg; Vibeke Andersen
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 3.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.