Literature DB >> 30267211

Feasibility of anatomical feature points for the estimation of prostate locations in the Bayesian delineation frameworks for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Kenta Ninomiya1, Hidetaka Arimura2, Motoki Sasahara1, Yudai Kai1,3, Taka-Aki Hirose1,4, Saiji Ohga5.   

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of anatomical feature points for the estimation of prostate locations in the Bayesian delineation frameworks for prostate cancer radiotherapy. The relationships between the reference centroids of prostate regions (CPRs) (prostate locations) and anatomical feature points were explored, and the most feasible anatomical feature points were selected based on the smallest location estimation errors of CPRs and the largest Dice's similarity coefficient (DSC) between the reference and extracted prostates. The reference CPRs were calculated according to reference prostate contours determined by radiation oncologists. Five anatomical feature points were manually determined on a prostate, bladder, and rectum in a sagittal plane of a planning computed tomography image for each case. The CPRs were estimated using three machine learning architectures [artificial neural network, random forest, and support vector machine (SVM)], which learned the relationships between the reference CPRs and anatomical feature points. The CPRs were applied for placing a prostate probabilistic atlas at the coordinates and extracting prostate regions using a Bayesian delineation framework. The average estimation errors without and with SVM using three feature points, which indicated the best performance, were 5.6 ± 3.7 mm and 1.8 ± 1.0 mm, respectively (the smallest error) (p < 0.001). The average DSCs without and with SVM using the three feature points were 0.69 ± 0.13 and 0.82 ± 0.055, respectively (the highest DSC) (p < 0.001). The anatomical feature points may be feasible for the estimation of prostate locations, which can be applied to the general Bayesian delineation frameworks for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomical feature points; Bayesian inference; Machine learning; Probabilistic atlas; Prostate cancer radiotherapy; Prostate location

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30267211     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-018-0481-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  14 in total

1.  Prostate position late in the course of external beam therapy: patterns and predictors.

Authors:  R C Zellars; P L Roberson; M Strawderman; D Zhang; H M Sandler; R K Ten Haken; D Osher; P W McLaughlin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Multicentre treatment planning inter-comparison in a national context: The liver stereotactic ablative radiotherapy case.

Authors:  Marco Esposito; Giulia Maggi; Carmelo Marino; Laura Bottalico; Elisabetta Cagni; Claudia Carbonini; Michelina Casale; Stefania Clemente; Valentina D'Alesio; David Fedele; Francesca Romana Giglioli; Valeria Landoni; Anna Martinotti; Roberta Nigro; Lidia Strigari; Elena Villaggi; Pietro Mancosu
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 2.685

3.  Do differences in target volume definition in prostate cancer lead to clinically relevant differences in normal tissue toxicity?

Authors:  Jacqueline E Livsey; James P Wylie; Ric Swindell; Vincent S Khoo; Richard A Cowan; John P Logue
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Active contours without edges.

Authors:  T F Chan; L A Vese
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 10.856

5.  Segmentation of pelvic structures for planning CT using a geometrical shape model tuned by a multi-scale edge detector.

Authors:  Fabio Martínez; Eduardo Romero; Gaël Dréan; Antoine Simon; Pascal Haigron; Renaud de Crevoisier; Oscar Acosta
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Lung stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy: A large scale multi-institutional planning comparison for interpreting results of multi-institutional studies.

Authors:  Francesca Romana Giglioli; Lidia Strigari; Riccardo Ragona; Giuseppina R Borzì; Elisabetta Cagni; Claudia Carbonini; Stefania Clemente; Rita Consorti; Randa El Gawhary; Marco Esposito; Maria Daniela Falco; David Fedele; Christian Fiandra; Maria Cristina Frassanito; Valeria Landoni; Gianfranco Loi; Elena Lorenzini; Maria Rosa Malisan; Carmelo Marino; Enrico Menghi; Barbara Nardiello; Roberta Nigro; Caterina Oliviero; Gabriella Pastore; Mariagrazia Quattrocchi; Ruggero Ruggieri; Irene Redaelli; Giacomo Reggiori; Serenella Russo; Elena Villaggi; Marta Casati; Pietro Mancosu
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  Quantification and predictors of prostate position variability in 50 patients evaluated with multiple CT scans during conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  M J Zelefsky; D Crean; G S Mageras; O Lyass; L Happersett; C C Ling; S A Leibel; Z Fuks; S Bull; H M Kooy; M van Herk; G J Kutcher
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Global cancer statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Lindsey A Torre; Freddie Bray; Rebecca L Siegel; Jacques Ferlay; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Freddie C Hamdy; Jenny L Donovan; J Athene Lane; Malcolm Mason; Chris Metcalfe; Peter Holding; Michael Davis; Tim J Peters; Emma L Turner; Richard M Martin; Jon Oxley; Mary Robinson; John Staffurth; Eleanor Walsh; Prasad Bollina; James Catto; Andrew Doble; Alan Doherty; David Gillatt; Roger Kockelbergh; Howard Kynaston; Alan Paul; Philip Powell; Stephen Prescott; Derek J Rosario; Edward Rowe; David E Neal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Evaluation of changes in the size and location of the prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum during a course of external beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  J C Roeske; J D Forman; C F Mesina; T He; C A Pelizzari; E Fontenla; S Vijayakumar; G T Chen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  1 in total

1.  Semi-automated prediction approach of target shifts using machine learning with anatomical features between planning and pretreatment CT images in prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yudai Kai; Hidetaka Arimura; Kenta Ninomiya; Tetsuo Saito; Yoshinobu Shimohigashi; Akiko Kuraoka; Masato Maruyama; Ryo Toya; Natsuo Oya
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 2.724

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.