Literature DB >> 24571959

Long-term outcomes of salvage lymph node dissection for clinically recurrent prostate cancer: results of a single-institution series with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

Nazareno Suardi1, Giorgio Gandaglia1, Andrea Gallina1, Ettore Di Trapani1, Vincenzo Scattoni1, Damiano Vizziello1, Vito Cucchiara1, Roberto Bertini1, Renzo Colombo1, Maria Picchio2, Giampiero Giovacchini2, Francesco Montorsi1, Alberto Briganti3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) patients with lymph node recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) are usually managed with androgen-deprivation therapy. Despite the absence of prospective randomized studies, salvage lymph node dissection (LND) has been proposed as an alternative treatment option.
OBJECTIVE: To examine long-term outcomes of salvage LND in patients with nodal recurrent PCa documented by 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Overall, 59 patients affected by biochemical recurrence (BCR) with 11C-choline PET/CT scan with pathologic activity treated between 2002 and 2008 were included. INTERVENTION: Pelvic and/or retroperitoneal salvage LND. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Biochemical response (BR) was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <0.2 ng/ml at 40 d after surgery. BCR for those who achieved BR was defined as a PSA >0.2 ng/ml. Clinical recurrence (CR) was defined as a positive PET/CT scan after salvage LND in the presence of a rising PSA. Kaplan-Meier curves assessed time to BCR, CR, and cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Cox regression analyses were fitted to assess predictors of CR. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Median follow-up after salvage LND was 81.1 mo. Overall, 35 patients (59.3%) achieved BR. The 8-yr BCR-free survival rate in patients with complete BR was 23%. Overall, the 8-yr CR- and CSM-free survival rates were 38% and 81%, respectively. In multivariable analyses evaluating preoperative variables, PSA at salvage LND represented the only predictor of CR (p=0.03). When postoperative variables were considered, BR and the presence of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases were significantly associated with the risk of CR (all p ≤ 0.04). Our study is limited by the lack of a control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Salvage LND may represent a therapeutic option for patients with BCR after RP and nodal pathologic uptake at 11C-choline PET/CT scan. Although most patients progressed to BCR after salvage LND, roughly 40% of them experienced CR-free survival. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Salvage lymph node dissection may represent a therapeutic option for selected patients with nodal recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Roughly 40% of men did not show any further clinical recurrence at long-term follow-up after surgery.
Copyright © 2014 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer-specific mortality; Clinical recurrence; Lymph node metastases; Prostate cancer; Salvage lymph node dissection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24571959     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  59 in total

1.  Radiotherapy for isolated lymph node metastases in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer after primary therapy.

Authors:  Christoph Henkenberens; Axel S Merseburger; Frank Bengel; Thorsten Derlin; Katja Hueper; Viktor Grünwald; Hans Christiansen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  (68)Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT-based radiotherapy in locally recurrent and recurrent oligometastatic prostate cancer : Early efficacy after primary therapy.

Authors:  Christoph Henkenberens; Christoph A von Klot; Tobias L Ross; Frank M Bengel; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Axel S Merseburger; Jens Vogel-Claussen; Hans Christiansen; Thorsten Derlin
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  (11)C-Choline PET/CT for restaging prostate cancer. Results from 4,426 scans in a single-centre patient series.

Authors:  Tiziano Graziani; Francesco Ceci; Paolo Castellucci; Giulia Polverari; Giacomo Maria Lima; Filippo Lodi; Alessio Giuseppe Morganti; Andrea Ardizzoni; Riccardo Schiavina; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT for restaging recurrent prostate cancer: which factors are associated with PET/CT detection rate?

Authors:  Francesco Ceci; Christian Uprimny; Bernhard Nilica; Llanos Geraldo; Dorota Kendler; Alexander Kroiss; Jasmin Bektic; Wolfgang Horninger; Peter Lukas; Clemens Decristoforo; Paolo Castellucci; Stefano Fanti; Irene J Virgolini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Prostate cancer: Identifying sites of recurrence with choline-PET-CT imaging.

Authors:  Paolo Castellucci; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  [Surgery for metastatic prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Fröhner; M Wirth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  PET and PET/CT with radiolabeled choline in prostate cancer: a critical reappraisal of 20 years of clinical studies.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Elisabetta Giovannini; Rossella Leoncini; Mattia Riondato; Andrea Ciarmiello
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Oncological outcome of patients treated with spot-specific salvage lymphnode dissection (sLND) for positron-emission tomography (PET)-positive prostate cancer (PCa) relapse.

Authors:  Andreas Hiester; Alessandro Nini; Günter Niegisch; Christian Arsov; Hubertus Hautzel; Christina Antke; Lars Schimmöller; Peter Albers; Robert Rabenalt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  PET imaging for lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Elena Incerti; Paola Mapelli; Luigi Gianolli; Maria Picchio
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  [Focus on molecular imaging in prostate cancer].

Authors:  L Michaud; K A Touijer
Journal:  Prog Urol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 0.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.