Marion Vermeulen1, Nico Lelie2, Charl Coleman1, Wendy Sykes1, Genevieve Jacobs1, Ronel Swanevelder1, Michael Busch3, Gert van Zyl4,5, Eduard Grebe6, Alex Welte6, Ravi Reddy1. 1. South African National Blood Service, Roodepoort, South Africa. 2. Lelie Research, Alkmaar, The Netherlands. 3. Blood Systems Research Institute, San Francisco, California. 4. Division of Medical Virology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Parow, South Africa. 5. National Health Laboratory Service, Tygerberg Business Unit, Parow, South Africa. 6. DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in Epidemiological Modelling and Analysis (SACEMA), Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 1998 we estimated that 34/million infectious window period donations were entering the blood supply at the South African National Blood Service. Selective use of donations based on donor race-ethnicity reduced this risk to 26/million donations but was deemed unethical. Consequently, in 2005 South African National Blood Service eliminated race-ethnicity-based collection policies and implemented individual-donation nucleic acid testing (ID-NAT). We describe the change in donor base demographics, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) detection rates, and transfusion-transmissible HIV risk. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In ten years 7.7 million donations were tested for anti-HIV and HIV RNA. Number of donations, HIV prevalence, ID-NAT yield rate, serology yield rate and residual transfusion-transmissible HIV risk were analyzed by donor type, race-ethnicity, age, and sex. Multiple regression analysis was performed to investigate the determinants of HIV-positive and nucleic acid testing yield donations. RESULTS: The combined strategy of increasing donations from black donors and implementing ID-NAT increased the proportion of donations from black donors from 6% in 2005 to 30% in 2015 (p < 0.00001), and reduced the transfusion-transmissible risk from 24 to 13 per million transfusions. ID-NAT interdicted 481 (1:16,100) seronegative window period donations, while one transfusion-transmissible case (0.13 per million) was documented. Race-ethnicity and donor type were highly significant predictors of HIV positivity, with adjusted odds ratio for first-time donors of 12.5 (95% confidence interval, 11.9-13.1) and for black race-ethnicity of 31.1 (95% confidence interval, 28.9-33.4). The proportion of serology yields among HIV-infected donors increased from 0.27% to 2.4%. CONCLUSION: ID-NAT enabled the South African National Blood Service to increase the number of donations from black donors fivefold while enhancing the safety of the blood supply.
BACKGROUND: In 1998 we estimated that 34/million infectious window period donations were entering the blood supply at the South African National Blood Service. Selective use of donations based on donor race-ethnicity reduced this risk to 26/million donations but was deemed unethical. Consequently, in 2005 South African National Blood Service eliminated race-ethnicity-based collection policies and implemented individual-donation nucleic acid testing (ID-NAT). We describe the change in donor base demographics, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) detection rates, and transfusion-transmissible HIV risk. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In ten years 7.7 million donations were tested for anti-HIV and HIV RNA. Number of donations, HIV prevalence, ID-NAT yield rate, serology yield rate and residual transfusion-transmissible HIV risk were analyzed by donor type, race-ethnicity, age, and sex. Multiple regression analysis was performed to investigate the determinants of HIV-positive and nucleic acid testing yield donations. RESULTS: The combined strategy of increasing donations from black donors and implementing ID-NAT increased the proportion of donations from black donors from 6% in 2005 to 30% in 2015 (p < 0.00001), and reduced the transfusion-transmissible risk from 24 to 13 per million transfusions. ID-NAT interdicted 481 (1:16,100) seronegative window period donations, while one transfusion-transmissible case (0.13 per million) was documented. Race-ethnicity and donor type were highly significant predictors of HIV positivity, with adjusted odds ratio for first-time donors of 12.5 (95% confidence interval, 11.9-13.1) and for black race-ethnicity of 31.1 (95% confidence interval, 28.9-33.4). The proportion of serology yields among HIV-infected donors increased from 0.27% to 2.4%. CONCLUSION:ID-NAT enabled the South African National Blood Service to increase the number of donations from black donors fivefold while enhancing the safety of the blood supply.
Authors: Josephine Mitchel; Brian Custer; Zhanna Kaidarova; Edward L Murphy; Karin van den Berg Journal: Transfusion Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Marion Vermeulen; Dhuly Chowdhury; Ronel Swanevelder; Eduard Grebe; Donald Brambilla; Ute Jentsch; Michael Busch; Gert Van Zyl; Edward L Murphy Journal: Vox Sang Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 2.144
Authors: Karin van den Berg; Marion Vermeulen; Vernon J Louw; Edward L Murphy; Gary Maartens Journal: Transfusion Date: 2021-07-05 Impact factor: 3.337
Authors: Marion Vermeulen; Cari van Schalkwyk; Genevieve Jacobs; Karin van den Berg; Mars Stone; Sonia Bakkour; Brian Custer; Ute Jentsch; Michael P Busch; Edward Murphy; Eduard Grebe Journal: Viruses Date: 2022-06-29 Impact factor: 5.818
Authors: Sheila de Oliveira Garcia Mateos; Liliana Preiss; Thelma T Gonçalez; Claudia Di Lorenzo Oliveira; Eduard Grebe; Clara Di Germanio; Mars Stone; Luiz Amorim Filho; Anna Bárbara Carneiro Proietti; Andre Rolim Belisario; Cesar de Almeida-Neto; Alfredo Mendrone-Junior; Paula Loureiro; Michael P Busch; Brian Custer; Ester Cerdeira Sabino Journal: Vox Sang Date: 2020-09-30 Impact factor: 2.144
Authors: Marion C Lanteri; Felicia Santa-Maria; Andrew Laughhunn; Yvette A Girard; Marcus Picard-Maureau; Jean-Marc Payrat; Johannes Irsch; Adonis Stassinopoulos; Peter Bringmann Journal: Transfusion Date: 2020-04-24 Impact factor: 3.157