Literature DB >> 30265329

Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantation.

Danilo Cimadomo1, Antonio Capalbo2,3, Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti4, Daria Soscia1, Giovanna Orlando1, Elena Albani4, Valentina Parini4, Marta Stoppa1, Lisa Dovere1, Luisa Tacconi1, Elena Ievoli1, Roberta Maggiulli1, Filippo Maria Ubaldi1, Laura Rienzi1.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Are trophectoderm biopsy or other pre-vitrification features or laboratory practices associated with differences in blastocyst post-warming behavior (degeneration, re-expansion and live birth after single embryo transfer (SET))? SUMMARY ANSWER: Blastocyst morphology, day of full development and artificial shrinkage (either laser-assisted or biopsy-induced) are the pre-vitrification parameters/practices most strongly associated with post-warming behavior and implantation potential while there was no association with trophectoderm biopsy. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Since the introduction of vitrification, the adoption of cycle segmentation, freeze-all and SET policies, as well of trophectoderm biopsy-based aneuploidy testing (i.e. pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A)), the number of blastocysts vitrified worldwide has increased greatly. Previous studies already defined generally high blastocyst cryo-survival rates after vitrification-warming (>95%), along with a positive correlation between blastocyst re-expansion and morphology with implantation. Additionally, artificial shrinkage has been outlined as a potentially beneficial procedure, while the association between embryo cryo-survival and trophectoderm biopsy is still unclear. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Cohort study conducted at two IVF centers (1 and 2). A total of 2129 consecutive SETs using vitrified-warmed blastocysts in either non-PGT or PGT-A cycles between June 2016 and August 2017 were included. A freeze-all strategy was in place and three main pre-vitrification practices were used: (i) no biopsy and no artificial shrinkage (Clinic 1); (ii) trophectoderm biopsy and vitrification of collapsed blastocyst within 30 min (Clinics 1 and 2); and (iii) no biopsy but laser-assisted artificial shrinkage (Clinic 2). The primary outcome was the blastocyst degeneration rate. Overall, 2108 surviving blastocysts were graded at 1.5 h after warming for degeneration (absent or partial) and re-expansion (full, partial or absent) grades and post-warming morphological quality. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the association of any pre-vitrification feature with blastocyst post-warming behavior. The logistic regressions conducted upon live birth after either untested or euploid SET also included the post-warming characteristics. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Center 1 is a private IVF facility, while center 2 is the IVF facility of a University hospital. In non-PGT cycles, ICSI with blastocyst culture up to full-expansion and vitrification were performed. At center 1 the untested blastocysts were vitrified when still expanded, while at center 2 they underwent laser-assisted artificial shrinkage. In PGT-A cycles, in both clinics, trophectoderm biopsy (which involves laser-assisted shrinkage) was done without previous zona-opening on Day 3, and vitrification was performed within 30 min whilst the blastocyst remained collapsed. A qPCR-based chromosome analysis was conducted. Only SETs were performed (euploid-SET in case of PGT-A). Any cycle-, laboratory- and embryo-based feature which could impact blastocyst post-warming behavior was included in the analyses as putative confounder. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The overall degeneration rate was 1% (N = 21/2129). The results were consistent among different vitrification/warming operators or kits used, as well as any other IVF laboratory-related parameter. Blastocyst artificial shrinkage (either laser-assisted or biopsy-induced) involved a lower risk of degeneration after warming (odds ratio (OR) [95% CI] = 0.26 [0.09-0.79]). Conversely, both poor morphological quality pre-vitrification and taking 7 days to reach full blastulation resulted in a significantly higher risk (OR [95% CI] = 11.67 [3.42-39.83] and 4.43 [1.10-20.55], respectively). Importantly, trophectoderm biopsy did not show any association with blastocyst cryo-survival/degeneration. Overall 2.5% (N = 53/2108) blastocysts failed to re-expand post-warming. The only parameters significantly associated with no blastocyst re-expansion post-warming were average (OR [95% CI] = 4.96 [2.20-11.21]) or poor (OR [95% CI] = 19.54 [8.39-45.50]) morphological quality and taking 7 days to reach full blastulation (OR [95% CI] = 3.19 [1.23-8.29]), as well as prevention of spontaneous hatching pre-vitrification (OR [95% CI] = 0.10 [0.01-0.85]). The post-warming features of the survived blastocyst (i.e. degeneration and re-expansion scores and morphological quality) showed no significant association with vitrified blastocyst competence (i.e. live birth) when corrected for pre-vitrification ones (i.e. morphological quality, day of full development and, for untested SET, maternal age at oocyte retrieval). Of note, poor-quality blastocysts pre-vitrification showed a high overall cryo-survival rate post-warming 92.8% (N = 116/125), but the live birth rates were only 2.1% (N = 1/48) and 7.3% (N = 5/68) after untested and euploid SET, respectively. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study is not randomized and the populations of patients undergoing either non-PGT or PGT-A cycles were different. Centers 1 and 2 adopted different pre-vitrification practices for non-biopsied blastocysts, according to their own laboratory policy. To this regard, multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted for all outcomes under investigation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: Pre-vitrification features may be used to assist selection of competent embryos, moreover, these results allay concern that trophectoderm biopsy might be associated with impaired blastocyst quality or competence after vitrification/warming. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: None.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30265329     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  14 in total

1.  Similar miRNomic signatures characterize the follicular fluids collected after follicular and luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle.

Authors:  Danilo Cimadomo; Ramona Carmelo; Elvira Immacolata Parrotta; Stefania Scalise; Gianluca Santamaria; Erminia Alviggi; Maria Teresa De Angelis; Gianmarco Sarro; Alberto Vaiarelli; Roberta Venturella; Laura Rienzi; Fulvio Zullo; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Giovanni Cuda
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  An integrated investigation of oocyte developmental competence: expression of key genes in human cumulus cells, morphokinetics of early divisions, blastulation, and euploidy.

Authors:  C Scarica; D Cimadomo; L Dovere; A Giancani; M Stoppa; A Capalbo; F M Ubaldi; L Rienzi; R Canipari
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Second stimulation in the same ovarian cycle: an option to fully-personalize the treatment in poor prognosis patients undergoing PGT-A.

Authors:  Alberto Vaiarelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Gianluca Gennarelli; Maurizio Guido; Carlo Alviggi; Alessandro Conforti; Claudia Livi; Alberto Revelli; Silvia Colamaria; Cindy Argento; Maddalena Giuliani; Carlo De Angelis; Maria Matteo; Stefano Canosa; Angela D'Alfonso; Valentino Cimadomo; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Maria Ubaldi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Live birth rate following a euploid blastocyst transfer is not affected by double vitrification and warming at cleavage or blastocyst stage.

Authors:  Efstathios Theodorou; Benjamin P Jones; Daniella F Cardenas Armas; Carleen Heath; Paul Serhal; Jara Ben-Nagi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 3.357

Review 5.  Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: A review.

Authors:  Naoki Aoyama; Keiichi Kato
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2020-01-26

Review 6.  The unknown human trophectoderm: implication for biopsy at the blastocyst stage.

Authors:  Angelo Tocci
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Blastocyst age, expansion, trophectoderm morphology, and number cryopreserved are variables predicting clinical implantation in single blastocyst frozen embryo transfers in freeze-only-IVF.

Authors:  Kemal Ozgur; Murat Berkkanoglu; Hasan Bulut; Levent Donmez; Ayhan Isikli; Kevin Coetzee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Oocyte competence is independent of the ovulation trigger adopted: a large observational study in a setting that entails vitrified-warmed single euploid blastocyst transfer.

Authors:  Danilo Cimadomo; Alberto Vaiarelli; Cecilia Petriglia; Gemma Fabozzi; Susanna Ferrero; Mauro Schimberni; Cindy Argento; Silvia Colamaria; Maddalena Giuliani; Nicolò Ubaldi; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Maria Ubaldi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.357

9.  Standardization of Post-Vitrification Human Blastocyst Expansion as a Tool for Implantation Prediction.

Authors:  Anat Hershko-Klement; Shaul Raviv; Luba Nemerovsky; Tal Rom; Ayelet Itskovich; Danit Bakhshi; Adrian Shulman; Yehudith Ghetler
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Factors associated with vitrification-warming survival in 6167 euploid blastocysts.

Authors:  Margeaux Oliva; Christine Briton-Jones; Dmitry Gounko; Joseph A Lee; Alan B Copperman; Lucky Sekhon
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.