Mohammed E Al-Sofiani1,2, Lisa R Yanek3,4, Nauder Faraday4,5, Brian G Kral4,6, Rasika Mathias4,7, Lewis C Becker4,6, Diane M Becker3,4, Dhananjay Vaidya3,4, Rita R Kalyani1,8. 1. Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. 2. Division of Endocrinology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 3. Division of General Internal Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 4. GeneSTAR Research Program, Division of General Internal Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 5. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 6. Division of Cardiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 7. Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 8. The Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
Context: Previous studies have suggested less cardioprotective benefit of aspirin in adults with diabetes, raising concerns about "aspirin resistance" and potentially reduced effectiveness for prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Objective: To examine differences in platelet response to aspirin by diabetes status. Design, Setting, Participants: We examined platelet response before and after aspirin (81 mg/day for 14 days) in 2113 adults (175 with diabetes, 1,938 without diabetes), in the Genetic Study of Aspirin Responsiveness cohort, who had family history of early-onset CVD. Main Outcome Measures: In vivo platelet activation (urinary thromboxane B2), in vitro platelet aggregation to agonists (arachidonic acid, adenosine diphosphate, collagen), and platelet function analyzer-100 closure time. Results: Although adults with diabetes had higher in vivo platelet activation before aspirin, the reduction in in vivo platelet activation after aspirin was similar in those with vs without diabetes. Likewise, the reduction in multiple in vitro platelet measures was similar after aspirin by diabetes status. In regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, race, BMI, smoking, platelet counts, and fibrinogen levels, in vivo platelet activation remained higher in adults with vs without diabetes after aspirin (P = 0.04), but this difference was attenuated after additional adjustment for preaspirin levels (P = 0.10). No differences by diabetes status were noted for any of the in vitro platelet measures after aspirin in fully adjusted models that also accounted for preaspirin levels. Conclusions: In vitro platelet response to aspirin does not differ by diabetes status, suggesting no intrinsic differences in platelet response to aspirin. Instead, factors extrinsic to platelet function should be investigated to give further insights into aspirin use for primary prevention in diabetes.
Context: Previous studies have suggested less cardioprotective benefit of aspirin in adults with diabetes, raising concerns about "aspirin resistance" and potentially reduced effectiveness for prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Objective: To examine differences in platelet response to aspirin by diabetes status. Design, Setting, Participants: We examined platelet response before and after aspirin (81 mg/day for 14 days) in 2113 adults (175 with diabetes, 1,938 without diabetes), in the Genetic Study of Aspirin Responsiveness cohort, who had family history of early-onset CVD. Main Outcome Measures: In vivo platelet activation (urinary thromboxane B2), in vitro platelet aggregation to agonists (arachidonic acid, adenosine diphosphate, collagen), and platelet function analyzer-100 closure time. Results: Although adults with diabetes had higher in vivo platelet activation before aspirin, the reduction in in vivo platelet activation after aspirin was similar in those with vs without diabetes. Likewise, the reduction in multiple in vitro platelet measures was similar after aspirin by diabetes status. In regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, race, BMI, smoking, platelet counts, and fibrinogen levels, in vivo platelet activation remained higher in adults with vs without diabetes after aspirin (P = 0.04), but this difference was attenuated after additional adjustment for preaspirin levels (P = 0.10). No differences by diabetes status were noted for any of the in vitro platelet measures after aspirin in fully adjusted models that also accounted for preaspirin levels. Conclusions: In vitro platelet response to aspirin does not differ by diabetes status, suggesting no intrinsic differences in platelet response to aspirin. Instead, factors extrinsic to platelet function should be investigated to give further insights into aspirin use for primary prevention in diabetes.
Authors: Lars Rydén; Peter J Grant; Stefan D Anker; Christian Berne; Francesco Cosentino; Nicolas Danchin; Christi Deaton; Javier Escaned; Hans-Peter Hammes; Heikki Huikuri; Michel Marre; Nikolaus Marx; Linda Mellbin; Jan Ostergren; Carlo Patrono; Petar Seferovic; Miguel Sousa Uva; Marja-Riita Taskinen; Michal Tendera; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Paul Valensi; Jose Luis Zamorano; Jose Luis Zamorano; Stephan Achenbach; Helmut Baumgartner; Jeroen J Bax; Héctor Bueno; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Cetin Erol; Robert Fagard; Roberto Ferrari; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Patrizio Lancellotti; Ales Linhart; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Massimo F Piepoli; Piotr Ponikowski; Per Anton Sirnes; Juan Luis Tamargo; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Guy De Backer; Per Anton Sirnes; Eduardo Alegria Ezquerra; Angelo Avogaro; Lina Badimon; Elena Baranova; Helmut Baumgartner; John Betteridge; Antonio Ceriello; Robert Fagard; Christian Funck-Brentano; Dietrich C Gulba; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; John K Kjekshus; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Eli Lev; Christian Mueller; Ludwig Neyses; Peter M Nilsson; Joep Perk; Piotr Ponikowski; Zeljko Reiner; Naveed Sattar; Volker Schächinger; André Scheen; Henrik Schirmer; Anna Strömberg; Svetlana Sudzhaeva; Juan Luis Tamargo; Margus Viigimaa; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; Robert G Xuereb Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Paul A Gurbel; Kevin P Bliden; Joseph DiChiara; Justin Newcomer; Willy Weng; Nagaraj K Neerchal; Tania Gesheff; Srivasavi K Chaganti; Amena Etherington; Udaya S Tantry Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-06-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Paolo Gresele; Giuseppe Guglielmini; Massimiliano De Angelis; Silvia Ciferri; Marco Ciofetta; Emanuela Falcinelli; Carlo Lalli; Giovanni Ciabattoni; Giovanni Davì; Geremia B Bolli Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-03-19 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Colin Baigent; Lisa Blackwell; Rory Collins; Jonathan Emberson; Jon Godwin; Richard Peto; Julie Buring; Charles Hennekens; Patricia Kearney; Tom Meade; Carlo Patrono; Maria Carla Roncaglioni; Alberto Zanchetti Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-05-30 Impact factor: 79.321