Jasmine Kaur1, Arun Sharma1, Ruchika Gupta2, Harpreet Singh1. 1. Division of Informatics, Systems & Research Management, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi 110 029, India. 2. Division of Cytopathology, ICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention & Research, Noida 201 301, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Smokeless tobacco (SLT) products are consumed by 356 million people in 140 countries around the world1. Consumption of SLT products has been estimated to account for about 0.65 million deaths per year2. Worldwide, SLT products are consumed in varying forms ranging from simple cured tobacco to processed products with many chemical ingredients and additives34. Variations occur with the geographical location, type of tobacco plant, additives, flavouring agents, processing and curing methods45. Published reports highlight the chemical changes that a tobacco plant undergoes until the formation of final SLT product5. This creates product-wise and brand-wise variations in different SLT products.Chemical profiling of SLT products has been attempted by some researchers678910111213. A vital role of various chemicals has been indicated in the adverse health effects reported with SLT use3514. Based on their carcinogenicity in experimental animals and humans, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified SLT products as group 1 carcinogen (Carcinogenic to humans)34. Two of the chemicals found abundantly in SLT products, namely N’-nitrosonornicotine (NNN) and 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) belonging to the class of tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs) have also been classified in this group35. NNN and NNK are formed by the nitrosation of nicotine, the major tobacco alkaloid15. Nicotine is available in SLT products in predominantly two forms as follows: protonated and unprotonated16. Unprotonated/free nicotine, the amount of which varies according to the pH of the SLT product, can cross cell membranes readily516. Studies to estimate the pH and amount of total and free nicotine of various SLT products have been conducted16171819. However, a major drawback is the lack of comprehensive analysis of SLT products on a periodic basis. Most of the previous studies have been independent projects undertaken by different research groups focussing on one or two classes of chemical compounds only. These studies78910 depict variations in the amount of chemicals, pH and free nicotine content of SLT products. Thus, the need of the hour is to develop a one-stop repository compiling data on chemical analysis of SLT products from all the published studies. This will provide initial data for establishing priorities in research on chemical profiling of SLT products.
Opportunities in the field of chemical profiling of smokeless tobacco products
Available studies and reports on the chemical profiling of SLT products can be used to collect initial data78910. Data on pH, moisture and free nicotine are also available from many reliable sources171920. After compiling the available data, information about the physicochemical properties and protein targets of the chemicals can be obtained from freely available chemical databases such as PubChem21, ChemSpider22, BindingDB23 and ChEMBL24. Further open source technologies, such as Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP/Perl, cascading style sheets, HTML, JavaScript and Data Tables can be exploited for the development of online repository. The repository can then be equipped with built-in modules for data upload, simple search and browse options along with dashboards for different stakeholders.
Challenges towards development of repository on smokeless tobacco products
Although the literature is replete with studies on SLT products, a major bottleneck is the availability and distribution of the data in an organized fashion to allow for further analysis. Furthermore, the available studies cater to potent carcinogens (such as TSNAs and polyaromatic hydrocarbons) with the scarcity of information about other chemical compounds35. One of the frequently used additives in SLT products, areca nut has been classified as a group 1 carcinogen4. Flavouring agents and other additives of SLT products have not been researched well. Moreover, the evolution of SLT products with the ever-increasing demand is making it difficult for researchers to study every SLT product in detail. Another significant challenge likely to be faced in the development of a repository of SLT product constituents is the absence of a standardized protocol of testing of these products and hence, the lack of comparability between studies.
Conclusion
Consumption of SLT products is a growing menace taking lives of millions of people worldwide. Evaluating the severity of the health effects of SLT products is a complex task mainly because of the variations in the products, their chemical composition and the differences in the mode of intake of these products. To effectively reduce the harm associated with SLT products, an important milestone will be the development of an online repository of chemical constituents of SLT products, as a one-stop information source on the carcinogenicity, physicochemical properties, protein targets and structural diversity of these chemicals. The repository will also provide initial data for developing regulations, guidelines and policies on the chemical composition of SLT products. Toxicokinetic studies can be utilized for identification of potentially harmful functional groups. The identified harmful groups can be replaced or removed to reduce the harm caused due to SLT products.
Authors: Stephen B Stanfill; André Luiz Oliveira da Silva; Joseph G Lisko; Tameka S Lawler; Peter Kuklenyik; Robert E Tyx; Elizabeth H Peuchen; Patricia Richter; Clifford H Watson Journal: Food Chem Toxicol Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 6.023
Authors: Min-Ae Song; Catalin Marian; Theodore M Brasky; Sarah Reisinger; Mirjana Djordjevic; Peter G Shields Journal: Toxicol Lett Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 4.372
Authors: Dhirendra N Sinha; Prakash C Gupta; Amit Kumar; Deeksha Bhartiya; Naveen Agarwal; Shashi Sharma; Harpreet Singh; Mark Parascandola; Ravi Mehrotra Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-11-15 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Dhirendra N Sinha; Rizwan A Suliankatchi; Prakash C Gupta; Thaksaphon Thamarangsi; Naveen Agarwal; Mark Parascandola; Ravi Mehrotra Journal: Tob Control Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 7.552