Literature DB >> 30264133

Estimated Costs of Pivotal Trials for Novel Therapeutic Agents Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, 2015-2016.

Thomas J Moore1,2, Hanzhe Zhang3,4, Gerard Anderson3,5, G Caleb Alexander3,4,6.   

Abstract

Importance: A critical question in health care is the extent of scientific evidence that should be required to establish that a new therapeutic agent has benefits that outweigh its risks. Estimating the costs of this evidence of efficacy provides an important perspective. Objective: To estimate costs and assess scientific characteristics of pivotal efficacy trials that supported the approval of new therapeutic agents by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from 2015 to 2016. Design and Setting: This study identified 59 novel therapeutic drugs using the annual summary reports from the FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA reviews, and peer-reviewed publications that were publicly available in 2017 were used to identify 52 characteristics of each efficacy trial. Costs were calculated with a global clinical trial cost assessment tool available to contract research organizations and pharmaceutical sponsors. Main Outcomes and Measures: Estimated mean cost and 95% CIs based on industry benchmark data from 60 countries. Measures of trials' scientific characteristics included trial design (no control group, placebo, and active drug), end point (surrogate outcome, clinical scale, and clinical outcome), patient enrollment, and treatment duration.
Results: A total of 138 pivotal clinical trials provided the basis for approval of 59 new therapeutic agents by the FDA from 2015 to 2016, with a median estimated cost of $19.0 million (interquartile range, $12.2 million-$33.1 million). Estimated costs ranged from less than $5 million for trials without a control group for 3 orphan drugs with fewer than 15 patients each to $346.8 million (95% CI, $252.0 million-$441.5 million) for a noninferiority trial with end points assessing clinical benefit. Twenty-six of 138 trials (18.8%) were uncontrolled, with a mean estimated cost of $13.5 million (95% CI, $10.1 million-$16.9 million). Trials designed with placebo or active drug comparators had an estimated mean cost of $35.1 million (95% CI, $25.4 million-$44.8 million). Costs also varied by trial end point, treatment duration, patient enrollment, and therapeutic area. Conclusions and Relevance: The highest-cost trials were those in which the new agent had to be proved to be noninferior with clinical benefit end points compared with an agent already available or those that required larger patient populations to achieve statistical power to document smaller treatment effects or accrue infrequently occurring end points.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30264133      PMCID: PMC6248200          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  7 in total

1.  Key cost drivers of pharmaceutical clinical trials in the United States.

Authors:  Aylin Sertkaya; Hui-Hsing Wong; Amber Jessup; Trinidad Beleche
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimates of R&D costs.

Authors:  Joseph A DiMasi; Henry G Grabowski; Ronald W Hansen
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Clinical trial evidence supporting FDA approval of novel therapeutic agents, 2005-2012.

Authors:  Nicholas S Downing; Jenerius A Aminawung; Nilay D Shah; Harlan M Krumholz; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Research and Development Spending to Bring a Single Cancer Drug to Market and Revenues After Approval.

Authors:  Vinay Prasad; Sham Mailankody
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  The Fate of FDA Postapproval Studies.

Authors:  Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; Thomas J Moore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Reducing the costs of phase III cardiovascular clinical trials.

Authors:  Eric L Eisenstein; Philip W Lemons; Barbara E Tardiff; Kevin A Schulman; M King Jolly; Robert M Califf
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Postmarket studies required by the US Food and Drug Administration for new drugs and biologics approved between 2009 and 2012: cross sectional analysis.

Authors:  Joshua D Wallach; Alexander C Egilman; Sanket S Dhruva; Margaret E McCarthy; Jennifer E Miller; Steven Woloshin; Lisa M Schwartz; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-05-24
  7 in total
  63 in total

Review 1.  Cancer drug development: The missing links.

Authors:  Ajaikumar B Kunnumakkara; Devivasha Bordoloi; Bethsebie Lalduhsaki Sailo; Nand Kishor Roy; Krishan Kumar Thakur; Kishore Banik; Mehdi Shakibaei; Subash C Gupta; Bharat B Aggarwal
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2019-04-08

2.  Impact of IMPACT: Longitudinal Analysis of an Integrated Participant Scheduling System in a Clinical Research Setting.

Authors:  Alex Butler; Junghwan Lee; Yat So; Linda Busacca; Karen Marder; Henry N Ginsberg; Dianne Frederick; Ismael Castaneda; Elizabeth Guerridoi; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2021-01-25

3.  Worldwide Clinical Demand for Antibiotics: Is It a Real Countdown?

Authors:  Carlos Barreiro; José-Luis Barredo
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

4.  Identification of Common Data Elements from Pivotal FDA Trials.

Authors:  Craig S Mayer; Nick Williams; Vojtech Huser
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2021-01-25

5.  Demonstrating Contribution of Components of Fixed-Dose Drug Combinations Through Longitudinal Exposure-Response Analysis.

Authors:  Asbjørn Nøhr-Nielsen; Theis Lange; Julie Lyng Forman; Theodoros Papathanasiou; David J R Foster; Richard N Upton; Ole Jannik Bjerrum; Trine Meldgaard Lund
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 4.009

6.  When Is an In Silico Representation a Digital Twin? A Biopharmaceutical Industry Approach to the Digital Twin Concept.

Authors:  Rui M C Portela; Christos Varsakelis; Anne Richelle; Nikolaos Giannelos; Julia Pence; Sandrine Dessoy; Moritz von Stosch
Journal:  Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.635

Review 7.  Vancomycin-Induced Kidney Injury: Animal Models of Toxicodynamics, Mechanisms of Injury, Human Translation, and Potential Strategies for Prevention.

Authors:  Gwendolyn M Pais; Jiajun Liu; Sanja Zepcan; Sean N Avedissian; Nathaniel J Rhodes; Kevin J Downes; Ganesh S Moorthy; Marc H Scheetz
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 4.705

8.  Assessment of Availability, Clinical Testing, and US Food and Drug Administration Review of Biosimilar Biologic Products.

Authors:  Thomas J Moore; Morgane C Mouslim; Jenna L Blunt; G Caleb Alexander; Kenneth M Shermock
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Enrichment Benefits of Risk Algorithms for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Jacqueline V Scott; Christine E Garnett; Manreet K Kanwar; Norman L Stockbridge; Raymond L Benza
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 21.405

10.  Publication Bias in Gastrointestinal Oncology Trials Performed over the Past Decade.

Authors:  Gabrielle W Peters; Weiwei Tao; Wei Wei; Joseph A Miccio; Krishan R Jethwa; Michael Cecchini; Kimberly L Johung
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.