Literature DB >> 29794072

Postmarket studies required by the US Food and Drug Administration for new drugs and biologics approved between 2009 and 2012: cross sectional analysis.

Joshua D Wallach1,2, Alexander C Egilman3,2, Sanket S Dhruva4,5, Margaret E McCarthy2, Jennifer E Miller6, Steven Woloshin7, Lisa M Schwartz7, Joseph S Ross3,4,8,9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To characterize postmarketing requirements for new drugs and biologics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and to examine rates and timeliness of registration, results reporting, and publication of required prospective cohort studies, registries, and clinical trials.
DESIGN: Cross sectional analysis.
SETTING: Postmarketing requirements for all new drugs and biologics approved by the FDA between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2012, with follow-up up to 15 November 2017. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postmarketing requirements and their characteristics known at the time of FDA approval, including FDA authority, study design, and study characteristics. Rates and timeliness of registration and results reporting on ClinicalTrials.gov and publication in peer reviewed journals of required prospective cohort studies, registries, and clinical trials.
RESULTS: Between 2009 and 12, the FDA approved 97 new drugs and biologics for 106 indications with at least one postmarketing requirement at the time of first approval, for a total of 437 postmarketing requirements. Postmarket study descriptions were short (median word count 44 (interquartile range 29-71)) and often lacked information to determine an up to date progress (131 (30%)). 220 (50.3%) postmarketing requirements were for new animal or other studies (including pharmacokinetic studies); 134 (30.7%) were for prospective cohort studies, registries, and clinical trials; and 83 (19.0%) were for secondary analyses or follow-up studies. Of 110 clinical trials, 38 (34.5%), 44 (40.0%), 62 (56.4%), 66 (60.0%), and 98 (89.1%) did not report enough information to establish use of randomization, comparator type, allocation, outcome, and number of patients to be enrolled, respectively. Of 134 required prospective cohort studies, registries, and clinical trials, 102 (76.1%) were registered on ClinicalTrials.gov; of 50 registered and completed studies, 36 (72.0%) had reported results on ClinicalTrials.gov. Among 65 completed studies, 47 (72.3%) had either reported results or were published a median of 47 months (interquartile range 32-67) after FDA approval. 32 (68.1%) of these 47 studies did not report results publicly by the time of their original FDA report submission deadline.
CONCLUSIONS: Postmarketing requirements for new drugs and biologics were often briefly described and did not contain enough information to characterize study designs. Approximately three quarters of postmarketing requirements for prospective cohort studies, registries, and clinical trials were registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, and nearly three quarters of completed studies reported results or were published, suggesting that at least a quarter of these required studies are not being publicly disseminated. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29794072      PMCID: PMC5967364          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k2031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


Wallach JD, Egilman AC, Dhruva SS, et al Study question What are the characteristics of the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) postmarketing requirements, and what are the rates of registration and results reporting on ClinicalTrials.gov and publication in peer reviewed journals of required prospective cohort studies, registries, and clinical trials? Methods Postmarketing requirements known at the time of FDA approval (including FDA authority, study design, and study characteristics) for all new drugs and biologics approved in 2009-12 were characterised by use of publicly available FDA documents. ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, and Scopus were searched for registration records, reported results, and publications in peer reviewed journals for all required prospective cohort studies, registries, and clinical trials. Study answer and limitations Between 2009 and 2012, the FDA approved 97 new drugs and biologics for 106 indications with at least one postmarketing requirement at the time of first approval (437 postmarketing requirements in total). Many postmarketing requirements were briefly described (median word count of 44 (interquartile range 29-71)) and often lacked information to determine an up to date progress (131 (30%)). Of 134 postmarketing requirements for prospective cohort studies, registries, and clinical trials, 102 (76%) were registered on ClinicalTrials.gov; 47 (72.3%) of 65 completed studies had either reported results on ClinicalTrials.gov or were published a median of 47 (32-67) months after FDA approval. Similar registration and reporting rates were observed in clinical trials only. Publicly available data sources used in the study contained limited information, which made categorizing and determining ClinicalTrials.gov registrations and publications difficult. What this study adds Postmarket requirements for drugs and biologics are often briefly described in public documents, without enough information to determine the required study characteristics. Although three quarters of postmarketing requirements for prospective cohort studies, registries, and clinical trials were registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, at least one quarter of required studies for which results reporting or publication would be expected have not been publicly disseminated. Funding, competing interests, data sharing Funded by the Laura and John Arnold Foundation. Full competing interests details included on bmj.com. Data requests can be made to the corresponding author. Cite this as: BMJ 2018;361:k2031 Results reporting and publication of postmarketing requirements of new drugs and biologics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2009 and 2012. Data are number or number (%) of required studies FDAAA=Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act; PREA=Pediatric Research Equality Act. Indicates publication in the peer reviewed literature or results reporting on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Results reporting and publication of postmarketing requirements of new drugs and biologics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2009 and 2012. Data are number or number (%) of required studies

CategoryPublication or results reporting*
Eligible for publicationPublishedResults reported or published
Prospective cohort studies, registries, and clinical trials6537 (56.9)47 (72.3)
Authority
 FDAAA3722 (59.5)28 (75.7)
 PREA2211 (50.0)15 (68.2)
 Accelerated approval64 (66.7)4 (66.7)

FDAAA=Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act; PREA=Pediatric Research Equality Act.

Indicates publication in the peer reviewed literature or results reporting on ClinicalTrials.gov.

  22 in total

1.  Publication and Reporting of the Results of Postmarket Studies for Drugs Required by the US Food and Drug Administration, 2009 to 2013.

Authors:  Marisa L Cruz; Jing Xu; Mwango Kashoki; Peter Lurie
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Timing and Characteristics of Cumulative Evidence Available on Novel Therapeutic Agents Receiving Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval.

Authors:  Huseyin Naci; Olivier J Wouters; Radhika Gupta; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  The Fate of FDA Postapproval Studies.

Authors:  Steven Woloshin; Lisa M Schwartz; Brian White; Thomas J Moore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Rate of asthma trial outcomes reporting on ClinicalTrials.gov and in the published literature.

Authors:  Chris Stockmann; Joseph S Ross; Catherine M T Sherwin; Christopher A Reilly; Brittany McDowell; Bernhard Fassl; Flory Nkoy; Christopher G Maloney; Michael G Spigarelli
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 10.793

5.  Compliance with results reporting at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Authors:  Monique L Anderson; Karen Chiswell; Eric D Peterson; Asba Tasneem; James Topping; Robert M Califf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Publication of pivotal efficacy trials for novel therapeutic agents approved between 2005 and 2011: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  James W Smithy; Nicholas S Downing; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Measuring clinical trial transparency: an empirical analysis of newly approved drugs and large pharmaceutical companies.

Authors:  Jennifer E Miller; Marc Wilenzick; Nolan Ritcey; Joseph S Ross; Michelle M Mello
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Joseph S Ross; Gregory K Mulvey; Elizabeth M Hines; Steven E Nissen; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Publication and reporting of clinical trial results: cross sectional analysis across academic medical centers.

Authors:  Ruijun Chen; Nihar R Desai; Joseph S Ross; Weiwei Zhang; Katherine H Chau; Brian Wayda; Karthik Murugiah; Daniel Y Lu; Amit Mittal; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-02-17

Review 10.  Association of the FDA Amendment Act with trial registration, publication, and outcome reporting.

Authors:  Adam T Phillips; Nihar R Desai; Harlan M Krumholz; Constance X Zou; Jennifer E Miller; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  21 in total

1.  The Expanding Role of Real-World Evidence Trials in Health Care Decision Making.

Authors:  David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-03-06

2.  Timeliness of Postmarket Studies for New Pharmaceuticals Approved Between 2009 and 2012: a Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Authors:  Joshua D Wallach; Alexander C Egilman; Joseph S Ross; Steven Woloshin; Lisa M Schwartz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Estimated Costs of Pivotal Trials for Novel Therapeutic Agents Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, 2015-2016.

Authors:  Thomas J Moore; Hanzhe Zhang; Gerard Anderson; G Caleb Alexander
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Information about confirmatory studies required for new drugs conditionally approved by Health Canada: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Joel Lexchin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  New Drug Postmarketing Requirements and Commitments in the US: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Osman Moneer; Beatrice L Brown; Jerry Avorn; Jonathan J Darrow; Mayookha Mitra-Majumdar; Krysten W Joyce; Murray Ross; Catherine Pham; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 5.228

6.  Reporting of clinical trial safety results in ClinicalTrials.gov for FDA-approved drugs: A cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Krista Y Chen; Erin M Borglund; Emma Charlotte Postema; Adam G Dunn; Florence T Bourgeois
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 2.599

7.  US Food and Drug Administration utilization of postmarketing requirements and postmarketing commitments, 2009-2018.

Authors:  Joshua J Skydel; Audrey D Zhang; Sanket S Dhruva; Joseph S Ross; Joshua D Wallach
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  Evaluation of Drug Trials in High-, Middle-, and Low-Income Countries and Local Commercial Availability of Newly Approved Drugs.

Authors:  Jennifer E Miller; Michelle M Mello; Joshua D Wallach; Emily M Gudbranson; Blake Bohlig; Joseph S Ross; Cary P Gross; Peter B Bach
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-05-03

9.  Disagreements Within the US Food and Drug Administration Regarding Approval of Novel Therapeutic Agents, 2011-2015.

Authors:  Andrea MacGregor; Audrey D Zhang; Joshua D Wallach; Joseph S Ross; Matthew Herder
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-07-01

10.  Oncologic orphan drugs approved in the EU - do clinical trial data correspond with real-world effectiveness?

Authors:  Yvonne Schuller; Marieke Biegstraaten; Carla E M Hollak; Heinz-Josef Klümpen; Christine C Gispen-de Wied; Violeta Stoyanova-Beninska
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 4.123

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.