Extramedullary plasmacytomas (EMP) are a subcategory of plasma cell neoplasm that involves organs outside the bone marrow. Involvement of the pancreas is relatively rare, reported in only 2.3% of autopsies. Radiologic findings in plasmacytoma are nonspecific, but endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration is a fast and reliable technique to acquire a histologic sample for initial diagnosis. Recently, the use of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT has been recommended in patients with active multiple myeloma and solitary plasmacytoma. We present an interesting case of primary EMP in the pancreatic body encasing the portal vein as well as the celiac artery, which was detected before the patient was diagnosed of multiple myeloma.
Extramedullary plasmacytomas (EMP) are a subcategory of plasma cell neoplasm that involves organs outside the bone marrow. Involvement of the pancreas is relatively rare, reported in only 2.3% of autopsies. Radiologic findings in plasmacytoma are nonspecific, but endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration is a fast and reliable technique to acquire a histologic sample for initial diagnosis. Recently, the use of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT has been recommended in patients with active multiple myeloma and solitary plasmacytoma. We present an interesting case of primary EMP in the pancreatic body encasing the portal vein as well as the celiac artery, which was detected before the patient was diagnosed of multiple myeloma.
Entities:
Keywords:
Multiple myeloma; extramedullary plasmacytoma; pancreatic mass
Extramedullary plasmacytoma (EMP) is characterized by localized monoclonal plasma
cell proliferation that forms a solitary lesion outside the bone marrow. It is
usually diagnosed in patients with widespread multiple myeloma (MM). Extramedullary
plasmacytoma in its primary form is extremely rare. They are commonly found in the
head and neck region (80%) with only 5% to 10% of solitary cases arising from the
gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The GI involvement is most common in the small
intestine followed by the stomach.[1] We present a rare case of pancreatic EMP in a patient with newly diagnosed
advance MM.
Case Summary
A 73-year-old woman with no significant past medical history presented to the
emergency department (ED) with a history of left scapular and bilateral rib pain on
October 2015. X-ray imaging was unremarkable, and the patient was discharged home
with ibuprofen. After 2 months, the patient saw her family physician and complained
of decrease appetite, worsening periumbilical discomfort and a pulsatile mass in her
abdomen. She was found to be anemic with hemoglobin of 9.5 g/dL, hematocrit of
29.4%, and platelet of 123 000/mm3. Electrolyte profile showed borderline
hypokalemia (potassium levels of 3.3 mg/dL and normal calcium levels (9.5 mg/dL).
Kidney function tests showed borderline elevated urea levels (=24 mg/dL), a normal
creatinine level (0.93 mg/dL) and serum albumin were found to be 4.0 mg/dL. An
ultrasound of the abdomen showed a pancreatic mass and a follow-up computed
tomographic (CT) scan of the abdomen and pelvis revealed a large pancreatic body
mass encasing the portal vein as well as the celiac artery (Figure 1). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)
revealed a well-defined round mass arising from the body, measuring 6 cm on the long
axis and 4 cm on the short axis (Figure 2). No peripancreatic lymphadenopathy was noted. The fine-needle
aspiration (FNA) biopsy was only suspicious for atypical plasma cells.
Figure 1.
Computed tomographic scan of abdomen with contrast-large pancreatic body mass
encasing the portal vein as well as the celiac artery.
Figure 2.
Endoscopic ultrasound—well-defined mass arising from the pancreas. Mass on
ultrasonography was hypoechoic and heterogeneous. Mass measured 6 cm on long
axis and 4 cm on short axis. The mass was encasing the celiac artery.
Computed tomographic scan of abdomen with contrast-large pancreatic body mass
encasing the portal vein as well as the celiac artery.Endoscopic ultrasound—well-defined mass arising from the pancreas. Mass on
ultrasonography was hypoechoic and heterogeneous. Mass measured 6 cm on long
axis and 4 cm on short axis. The mass was encasing the celiac artery.A week later, she underwent CT-guided core biopsy of the pancreatic mass at the
discretion of her oncologist for further immunochemistry testing as the FNA biopsy
only stated “suspicious” for atypical plasma cells. Computed tomography–guided
biopsy of the pancreatic mass was remarkable for atypical plasma cells with positive
CD138 (Figure 3). They also
expressed CD56 as well as CD20. In situ hybridization suggested that the plasma
cells expressed both kappa and lambda light chains. The patient was thought to have
a plasma cell dyscrasia. She underwent a bone marrow biopsy which revealed mildly
hypercellular marrow and 50% to 70% plasma cell (major criteria; Figure 4). An aspirate was
remarkable for 34% plasma cells which were CD38 positive by flow cytometry. They
were monotypic demonstrating lambda chain (Figure 5). Immunoglobulin studies revealed an
IgG, which was elevated, IgM less than 21, IgA less than 8 (minor criteria), and
β2 microglobulin was 7.2. There was also a monoclonal spike notes.
She was diagnosed with MM according to the modified criteria. Positron emission
tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan revealed a pancreatic mass with focal
intense uptake and a hypermetabolic soft tissue mass in the ventral right abdomen.
There were multiple skeletal metastasis involving right mandibular ramus, the C6
vertebrae, and lytic lesions in the transverse process of T3 and numerous lesions
within the ribs. There was also focal uptake in the 5th and 7th thoracic spine
vertebral bodies, the right posterior superior iliac crest, the mid distal left
sacrum, and proximal femurs. The patient underwent chemotherapy treatment with
lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVD) along with elotuzumab and
responded nicely but had mild peripheral neuropathy
Figure 3.
Pancreatic biopsy shows predominant population of atypical plasma cells that
are CD138 positive: Hematoxylin and Eosin staining, magnification x 400.
Figure 4.
Bone marrow biopsy shows a mildly hypercellular marrow averaging 50% to 60%.
Cellularity is primarily due to increase in plasma cells which are diffusely
distributed throughout the marrow space and account for approximately 50% of
the nucleated elements: Hematoxylin and Eosin staining.
Figure 5.
Bone marrow, flow cytometric evaluation shows monotypic lambda light
chain–positive plasma cell population: Hematoxylin and Eosin staining.
Pancreatic biopsy shows predominant population of atypical plasma cells that
are CD138 positive: Hematoxylin and Eosin staining, magnification x 400.Bone marrow biopsy shows a mildly hypercellular marrow averaging 50% to 60%.
Cellularity is primarily due to increase in plasma cells which are diffusely
distributed throughout the marrow space and account for approximately 50% of
the nucleated elements: Hematoxylin and Eosin staining.Bone marrow, flow cytometric evaluation shows monotypic lambda light
chain–positive plasma cell population: Hematoxylin and Eosin staining.After 2 weeks, she underwent a magnetic resonance imaging which showed diffuse
moderate infiltration by a small left-sided extradural mass at T1-weighted imaging
with no significant neural compression. There was also a pathologic compression
fracture with posterior bony retropulsion involving C6 and associated mild cord
compression. She was then initiated on Cytoxan, carfilzomib, and Decadron and
received a brief course of radiotherapy between cycles 1 and 2. Then, she was
started on daratumumab and pomalidomide and subsequently Cytoxan was added. During
this time, she received palliative abdominal radiation.After 9 months, the patient later developed a liver mass and underwent a CT scan of
abdomen without contrast. Report showed hepatomegaly with multiple nodular masses in
liver. Due to the rare nature of MM arising as nodular liver lesions, a liver biopsy
was ordered to rule a second primary neoplasm. The biopsy results revealed
plasmacytoma with progression to stage 3 metastasis MM (Figures 6 to 8). She was actively receiving chemotherapy
and discharged. She later presented to the ED 3 weeks later with altered mental
status and fever. Her blood pressure (BP) was 90/50 with heart rate of 138 with a
low oxygen saturation of 90% on room air. Her respiratory rate was in 30 seconds and
she was using accessory muscles of respiration with a paradoxical breathing pattern.
The patient was intubated in ED and transferred to intensive care unit. She was
started on intravenous fluids and intravenous antibiotics (Zosyn, Vancomycin, and
tobramycin) for suspected sepsis. Her white blood cell count was 0.77, international
normalized ratio of 2.0, platelet count 21 000 (thrombocytopenia), and lactate was
4.8 mg/dL. Chest X-ray revealed bilateral lower lobe infiltrates likely source of
sepsis. Later, her lactate levels rose to 5.7 mg/dL and a bicarbonate drip was
initiated for refractory acidosis. Hemoglobin and hematocrit dropped to 4.1 and
12.3, respectively, with platelets further worsening to 11 000. Two units of blood
transfusion and 1 pack of platelets were ordered. Her BP further worsened to 70/20
and Levophed was increased to maximum dose. Vasopressin drip was started but did not
improve her hypotension; hence, epinephrine drip was started. All 3 vasopressors
reached maximum doses but her BP failed to improve. The family was informed and they
opted a do not resuscitate (DNR). The general condition of the patient worsened and
eventually died due to septic shock.
Figure 6.
Liver biopsy shows malignant neoplasia that is poorly differentiated but
focally has plasmacytic features: Hematoxylin and Eosin staining,
magnification x 400.
Figure 8.
Liver biopsy immunostain Ki67: high proliferation rate approaching 100%.
Liver biopsy shows malignant neoplasia that is poorly differentiated but
focally has plasmacytic features: Hematoxylin and Eosin staining,
magnification x 400.Liver biopsy immunostain CD138: diffuse strong positive.Liver biopsy immunostain Ki67: high proliferation rate approaching 100%.Ethical approval was not required for this case report as it did not relate to
patient’s privacy or treatment. The informed consent for description of the case
report could not be obtained because the patient was dead. However, consent from the
spouse was taken.
Discussion
We have described a rare case of pancreatic plasmacytoma without symptoms of MM.
Plasmacytoma can be primary or secondary with secondary form more common. The most
commonly involved sites are the liver, spleen, and lymph nodes. Involvement of the
pancreas is relatively rare, reported in only 2.3% of autopsies.[2] Overall, the occurrence of EMPs has been reported to be associated with poor
prognosis, high mortality rate, and a shorter overall survival time in patients with
MM. Favorable outcomes in cases of EMP have been linked to tumor size <4 cm, age
<50 years, patients with head and neck EMP, and serum M protein negativity. All
these prognostic factors were absent in our patient pointing toward an adverse outcome.[3]Our patient was diagnosed as primary EMP because the diagnosis of plasmacytoma was
made before the diagnosis of MM. To date, there are more than 63 cases in the
English literature of EMP with pancreatic involvement.[4,5] Although they can develop in any
part of the pancreas, many of these lesions are in the pancreatic head. The patient
described in our case report has a large pancreatic body mass encasing the portal
vein as well as the celiac artery which is even rarer in presentation. She later
went on to develop mass in liver with advanced stage 3 prognosis.Radiologic findings in plasmacytoma are nonspecific, but EUS-FNA is a fast and
reliable technique to acquire a histologic sample for initial diagnosis.[6] However, immunohistochemical analysis of the biopsy specimen or flow
cytometry of the aspirated material is crucial to prove the monoclonality and the
final diagnosis of a plasma cell neoplasm.[2] Recently, the use of 18FD-FDG PET/CT has been recommended in patients with
active MM and solitary plasmacytoma.[7] 18FD-FDG PET/CT combines functional imaging provided by PET with morphologic
evaluation assessed by CT, to detect metabolically active plasma cells both inside
and outside the bone marrow with anatomical localization, size and metabolic
properties of focal lesions, or EMP, or both to predict patients’ clinical outcome
and to assess therapy-induced changes in tumor-cell metabolism.[7] Plasma cell tumors tend to be radiosensitive and chemosensitive so the
treatment of choice for EMPs is generally some combination of surgery, chemotherapy,
and radiation therapy. Other methods of treatment under investigation are
thalidomide, angiogenic agents, and stem cell transplant for MM.[8] Newer molecular targets for targeted therapy are being evaluated and
experience with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell targets including BCMA (B-cell
maturation antigen), CD19, KLC, CD138 has shown nearly 100% global response in
patients with advanced MM.[9]In summary, we have presented a rare case of primary EMP in the pancreatic body
encasing the portal vein as well as the celiac artery which was detected before the
diagnosis of MM. Our case was one of the high-grade EMPs that was managed by the
currently recommended chemo-radiation therapy guidelines without a favorable outcome
thus pointing the need for further studies evaluating adjuvant treatment regimens
(based on novel agents) for these high-risk patients.[10] Even though it is a rare entity, it should be considered as a differential
diagnosis in patients presenting with bone pain and radiologic findings with a
pancreatic body mass and multiple liver masses. This case illustrates a rare
metastasis of MM to the pancreas with involvement of portal vein and celiac artery.
It also emphasizes the low morbidity of current biopsy techniques.
Authors: Michele Cavo; Evangelos Terpos; Cristina Nanni; Philippe Moreau; Suzanne Lentzsch; Sonja Zweegman; Jens Hillengass; Monika Engelhardt; Saad Z Usmani; David H Vesole; Jesus San-Miguel; Shaji K Kumar; Paul G Richardson; Joseph R Mikhael; Fernando Leal da Costa; Meletios-Athanassios Dimopoulos; Chiara Zingaretti; Niels Abildgaard; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Robert Z Orlowski; Wee Joo Chng; Hermann Einsele; Sagar Lonial; Bart Barlogie; Kenneth C Anderson; S Vincent Rajkumar; Brian G M Durie; Elena Zamagni Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: J Caers; B Paiva; E Zamagni; X Leleu; J Bladé; S Y Kristinsson; C Touzeau; N Abildgaard; E Terpos; R Heusschen; E Ocio; M Delforge; O Sezer; M Beksac; H Ludwig; G Merlini; P Moreau; S Zweegman; M Engelhardt; L Rosiñol Journal: J Hematol Oncol Date: 2018-01-16 Impact factor: 17.388